5) My argument, a bit more articulate that Hicks’, is that this attempt at fraud is not only from Marxism to Postmodernism, but from the long history of Pilpul/Critique, Abrahamic Law, Platonism, Abrahamic Monotheism, Abrahamic Theology, and Continental Philosophy (Rousseau/Kant)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:13:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055447368936669184
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@curtdoolittle @WorMartiN You also end by saying one should study law, not literature. First off, I don’t study literature. Secondly, how is that an argument? And how is if Marx is liable for murder at all relevant to my points? I’m genuinely confused.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680
Leave a Reply