CRITICISM: CURT, YOU”RE A MATERIALIST AND THAT’S INSUFFICIENT FOR A PHILOSOPHICA

CRITICISM: CURT, YOU”RE A MATERIALIST AND THAT’S INSUFFICIENT FOR A PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORK

—“Limiting your philosophy to pure materialism is a trap and this is what you promote here.”—

That is because you wish something from me that I do not provide, and what I provide inhibits you in obtaining what you desire.

What I promote is “the other side of the coin”.

For those who are weak need guidance.

For those who are strong, how to rule.

Those who need guidance seek ideas and inspiration that provide the greatest return.

Those who need to choose between conflicts need methods of decision making that cause the least harm.

Hence we have lower class religion, middle-class philosophy, upper middle-class science, and upper-class rule of law.

I am not writing a middle-class philosophy a lower class philosophy but a method of rule that makes maximum Liberty possible.

What people do with that Liberty is not my interest or problem. That is a problem for artists, and priests and mothers.

Creating the privilege of Liberty is my concern because without it they do not possess that luxury.

So if you need leadership and guidance and inspiration and emotional reward then you are someone who must be ruled.

If you seek the boundaries of your power so that you remain powerful enough to create liberty for eternity then that is my objective.

We men are unequal and perform different functions.

– Aristocracy judges.

– Priests advocate.

– Merchants and craftsman produce.

– Women bear and rear.

Simple minds seek a narrative conflation with which to produce a single axis of decidability because this is either all they know how to do or all they are cognitively able to do.

I produce a de-conflated equilibrium of causal axis that is useful for those who require greater precision and who can and desire to work with the equilibrial forces that exist in man and nature and in which man continuously seeks an equilibrium – and equilibrium that if ever obtained would result not in optimums but fragility, stagnation, and eventual loss to the red queen.

Now I am a charitable teacher. But this is very far above you. And you might consider pondering it rather than struggling so desperately to maintain your self-confidence in the single axis conflationary methods of decision-making that make you only slightly better at human cognition than a kindergartener.

—“You are (only) human”—

Yes, I am human. But by any measure, I have an extraordinary talent for analytic deconflation and the distillation of properties into first causes that is no doubt an accident of birth.

Thus Endeth the rather futile lesson.