Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Meritocracy Enforced By The Inquisition of Natu

    Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Meritocracy Enforced By The Inquisition of Natural Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 16:25:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002224626154573824

  • Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy Enforced By The Inquisitio

    Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy Enforced By The Inquisition of Natural Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 12:25:00 UTC

  • ONCE YOU SEE IT YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT 1 ) Via Positiva vs Via Negativa 2 ) Additive

    ONCE YOU SEE IT YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT

    1 ) Via Positiva vs Via Negativa

    2 ) Additive vs Subtractive

    3 ) Reason vs Science

    4 ) Logic vs Correspondence

    5 ) Rationalism vs Empiricism

    6 ) Justification vs Falsification

    7 ) (((Pilpul vs Critique)))

    8 ) (((Marxism))) vs Postmodernism

    9 ) (((Abrahamism))) vs Natural Law

    10) Conflation vs Deconflation

    11) Ambiguation vs Disambiguation

    It’s:

    Pilpul Via-Positiva Justification (deception)

    -vs-

    Critique via Negativa Falsification (deception).

    The invention of lying through loading, framing, overloading,

    and suggestion under cover of appeals to reasonableness,

    rather than Truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-30 14:38:00 UTC

  • You wanna priest to tell you comforting half truths, then go ask one. I’m a judg

    You wanna priest to tell you comforting half truths, then go ask one. I’m a judge and prosecutor of natural law. Truth and reciprocity aren’t comforting. They just are decidable. And if you don’t like those decisions you have to ask why you’re trying to free ride, seek rents, or steal from others.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 09:09:00 UTC

  • “Truth suppresses parasites and liars. It’s a prosecutorial tool. The damage it

    —“Truth suppresses parasites and liars. It’s a prosecutorial tool. The damage it inflicts is part of its value.”—Steve Pender

    (genius)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 22:01:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000497087035961344

  • True Enough

    TRUE ENOUGH FOR ACTION —“At what point do you know you have enough data and experience to act?”— Jeff Urizen When you (a) must act, (b) can pay for the full consequences of failure of your actions (c) can warranty your actions. In other words… when your knowledge is ‘true enough for the consequences’: TRUE ENOUGH A hierarchy of Truths: – True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship – True enough for me to feel good about myself. – True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results. – True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me. – True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values. – True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values. – True regardless of all opinions or perspectives. – Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal TRUE ENOUGH FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF ERROR
    May 26, 2018 12:51pm

  • True Enough

    TRUE ENOUGH FOR ACTION —“At what point do you know you have enough data and experience to act?”— Jeff Urizen When you (a) must act, (b) can pay for the full consequences of failure of your actions (c) can warranty your actions. In other words… when your knowledge is ‘true enough for the consequences’: TRUE ENOUGH A hierarchy of Truths: – True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship – True enough for me to feel good about myself. – True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results. – True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me. – True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values. – True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values. – True regardless of all opinions or perspectives. – Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal TRUE ENOUGH FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF ERROR
    May 26, 2018 12:51pm

  • Um. No. Truthful vs True. Shadow or Object?

    THIS ILLUSTRATION IS IMPRECISE (a) a “square” describes the shadow truthfully. (b) a “circle” describes the shadow truthfully. The question is whether one is testifying to the shadow or to the three dimensional object that casts it. One CANNOT testify to the shape of the three dimensional object that casts the shadow, one can only testify to the shape of the shadow. THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF TESTIMONY (Truth). “DO NOT MAKE SHIT UP by INFERENCE.”

  • Um. No. Truthful vs True. Shadow or Object?

    THIS ILLUSTRATION IS IMPRECISE (a) a “square” describes the shadow truthfully. (b) a “circle” describes the shadow truthfully. The question is whether one is testifying to the shadow or to the three dimensional object that casts it. One CANNOT testify to the shape of the three dimensional object that casts the shadow, one can only testify to the shape of the shadow. THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF TESTIMONY (Truth). “DO NOT MAKE SHIT UP by INFERENCE.”

  • “Truth suppresses parasites and liars. It’s a prosecutorial tool. The damage it

    —“Truth suppresses parasites and liars. It’s a prosecutorial tool. The damage it inflicts is part of its value.”—Steve Pender

    (genius)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 18:00:00 UTC