Theme: Truth

  • DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL I learned from this tw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1ishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1isGETTING DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL

    I learned from this two hour conversation that I can give a three hour lecture (with two long breaks) that would cover the epistemology thoroughly enough.

    Great stuff here. For the hard core guys here is pretty much the complete picture. And Eric did an amazing job of grilling me.

    ( @ Eric Orwoll )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:12:00 UTC

  • DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL I learned from this tw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ipV6oq1isGETTING DEEP INTO PROPERTARIANISM’S EPISTEMOLOGY WITH ERIC ORWALL

    I learned from this two hour conversation that I can give a three hour lecture (with two long breaks) that would cover the epistemology thoroughly enough.

    Great stuff here. For the hard core guys here is pretty much the complete picture. And Eric did an amazing job of grilling me.

    ( @ @[602477171:2048:Eric Orwoll] )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:12:00 UTC

  • Grammars Always Tell the Truth

    You can always make excuses for everything. Hence Astrology, Numerology, Theology, Pilpul and Critique, Rationalism, Formal Logic, Moralizing, Legislative Argument, postmodern (relativism) argument, and all variations thereof. All of these techniques consist of the Fictionalism “Pseudorationalism”. Just as Marxism, Socialism, Frankfurt-ism, Feminism consist of pseudosciences. Just as all Magic, Superstition, Religion, Occult, Mysticism consist of the fictionalism “Supernaturalism”. You can only testify one continuous grammar: consistently, correspondently, operationally, completely, and coherently. That means the only ‘Prophet’ that was not lying was Aristotle.

  • Grammars Always Tell the Truth

    You can always make excuses for everything. Hence Astrology, Numerology, Theology, Pilpul and Critique, Rationalism, Formal Logic, Moralizing, Legislative Argument, postmodern (relativism) argument, and all variations thereof. All of these techniques consist of the Fictionalism “Pseudorationalism”. Just as Marxism, Socialism, Frankfurt-ism, Feminism consist of pseudosciences. Just as all Magic, Superstition, Religion, Occult, Mysticism consist of the fictionalism “Supernaturalism”. You can only testify one continuous grammar: consistently, correspondently, operationally, completely, and coherently. That means the only ‘Prophet’ that was not lying was Aristotle.

  • Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul

    Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul can never tell us anything except deception is possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 14:27:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002919589943107584

  • ARYANISM| Truth, Duty, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets in Everything. |HISTORY

    |ARYANISM| Truth, Duty, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets in Everything.

    |HISTORY| Aryanism (Sovereignty) > European (Germanic) Traditional Law > Greek Math and Reason > Aristotelianism > [dark ages] > Empiricism > Science > Operationalism > Testimonialism.

    FALSEHOODS

    Falsehood is falsehood.

    Supernaturalism is falsehood.

    Scripturalism is falsehood.

    Abrahamism (conflation) is falsehood.

    Pilpul/Critique are falsehoods.

    Justificationary Rationalism is falsehood.

    Pseudosciences are falsehoods.

    Postmodernism (denialism) is falsehood.

    |GRAMMARS| Identity > Maths > Logics > Empiricisms > Algorithms(operations) > Testimony > Ordinary Language > Stories > Fictions > Fictionalisms (pseudoscience, supernatural-isms, theology, justification-isms) > Outright Lying.

    My ‘philosophy’ is just science, and in particular, the science of testimony, and in particular, the use of grammars (rules of continuous disambiguation) to falsify sophisms and deceits.

    The difference is that most scientists just say you’re wrong, and I say ‘They’re all liars’.

    I work in law. Testimony. And I prosecute falsehood.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 13:39:00 UTC

  • GRAMMARS ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH You can always make excuses for everything. Hence

    GRAMMARS ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH

    You can always make excuses for everything. Hence Astrology, Numerology, Theology, Pilpul and Critique, Rationalism, Formal Logic, Moralizing, Legislative Argument, postmodern (relativism) argument, and all variations thereof.

    All of these techniques consist of the Fictionalism “Pseudorationalism”.

    Just as Marxism, Socialism, Frankfurt-ism, Feminism consist of pseudosciences.

    Just as all Magic, Superstition, Religion, Occult, Mysticism consist of the fictionalism “Supernaturalism”.

    You can only testify one continuous grammar: consistently, correspondently, operationally, completely, and coherently.

    That means the only ‘Prophet’ that was not lying was Aristotle.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 10:39:00 UTC

  • Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul

    Logic can tell us what is false, but it rarely can tell us what is true. Pilpul can never tell us anything except deception is possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-02 10:27:00 UTC

  • Rationalism vs Falsificationism

    Rationalism = Excuse. Falsificationism = Necessity 1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral appeal and hazard: (a) Abrahamism: Pilpul via-positiva (Excuse) vs Critique via-negativa (Ridicule) – vs – (b) Aryanism: Law via-positiva (“I May”) vs Science via-Negativa (Survival from testing) 2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need a third defense against falsehood: 1) Cognitive Biases, 2) Rhetorical Fallacies, 3) Justificationary Deceits. … 3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appeal to consideration, appeal to empathy, appeal to optimistic outcomes, with loading, framing, selectivity, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, propaganda, and The Fictionalisms. 4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (Ghetto ethics).
  • Rationalism vs Falsificationism

    Rationalism = Excuse. Falsificationism = Necessity 1) You know, I specialize in the methods of deception, particularly by moral appeal and hazard: (a) Abrahamism: Pilpul via-positiva (Excuse) vs Critique via-negativa (Ridicule) – vs – (b) Aryanism: Law via-positiva (“I May”) vs Science via-Negativa (Survival from testing) 2) Once you see Pilpul and Critique as techniques you’ll understand we now need a third defense against falsehood: 1) Cognitive Biases, 2) Rhetorical Fallacies, 3) Justificationary Deceits. … 3) Where those justificationary deceits include: appeal to reasonableness, appeal to consideration, appeal to empathy, appeal to optimistic outcomes, with loading, framing, selectivity, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, propaganda, and The Fictionalisms. 4) What can I warranty ethics (Militia Ethics), vs what can I make excuses for (Ghetto ethics).