It’s not based on evidence but on testifiability, due diligence, determinism, and parsimony. Not justification but the suppression of all ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. https://twitter.com/peternlimberg/status/1045286763294543872
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 02:35:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047314060000337920
https://twitter.com/peternlimberg/status/1045286763294543872
I suppose I know which theories I depend upon, but I know of no dogmas I depend upon for the simple reason that I work by falsifying dogmas, picking up the few grains of truth that remain, and working with them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 15:05:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046778181506744321
Reply addressees: @weltmord
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046776028662706176
IN REPLY TO:
@weltmord
@curtdoolittle You also believe in some dogmas, even if you wouldn’t know.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046776028662706176
Matthew: what is the difference between the unquestionable and the inviolable?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 14:21:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046767053783347200
Reply addressees: @MattMcLester
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046764515642290178
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046764515642290178
Yes on content, no on criticism. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
—“It’s the problem of squishy definitions like “liberalism” opposed to clear operational definitions. Propertarianism, essentially, combines nomocracy and property, where by law is decided by calculating exchanges of demonstrated property (en toto). All the nuances and details boils down to different configurations (and preferences) in which one applies this basic fundamental notion.” — Bill Joslin —“It’s not a matter of “don’t have spiritual values.” We ALL have them. Trying to eradicate spiritual values is most likely a vain and pointless ambition.The issues are:1) It’s not always possible to meaningfully communicate spiritual values that aren’t already shared. And even when it is, it’s usually not possible to reach any sort of agreement.2) It’s very hard to check, correct, adjust, or update spiritual values that are wrong, bad, unsuitable, or out of date.Which is why maybe you might WANT a few autists around profaning the sacred with unnaturally precise and complete language.Otherwise your faulty spiritual values have no way to die, when they inevitably must, but to die with you…”—Ely Harman
Yes on content, no on criticism. Demand for monopoly of positiva is different from necessity of monopoly of negativa. Make up whatever fairy stories incels desire. There is only one truth, and it is falsehood, and everything else is simply preference that expresses one’s reproductive interests.
—“It’s the problem of squishy definitions like “liberalism” opposed to clear operational definitions. Propertarianism, essentially, combines nomocracy and property, where by law is decided by calculating exchanges of demonstrated property (en toto). All the nuances and details boils down to different configurations (and preferences) in which one applies this basic fundamental notion.” — Bill Joslin —“It’s not a matter of “don’t have spiritual values.” We ALL have them. Trying to eradicate spiritual values is most likely a vain and pointless ambition.The issues are:1) It’s not always possible to meaningfully communicate spiritual values that aren’t already shared. And even when it is, it’s usually not possible to reach any sort of agreement.2) It’s very hard to check, correct, adjust, or update spiritual values that are wrong, bad, unsuitable, or out of date.Which is why maybe you might WANT a few autists around profaning the sacred with unnaturally precise and complete language.Otherwise your faulty spiritual values have no way to die, when they inevitably must, but to die with you…”—Ely Harman
—“The internet is revealing TRUTH in a way that humanity has never before seen, and the effects will change us as a species.”—Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 14:15:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045315925606576130
—“Truth only hurts those who are content living a lie.”–Dominic DeLuca
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 11:24:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045272876734132224
—“The Internet did not divide us. The Internet revealed our division.”—Ben Smith
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 11:06:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045268439613542400
—“The internet is revealing TRUTH in a way that humanity has never before seen, and the effects will change us as a species.”—Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 10:15:00 UTC
—“Truth only hurts those who are content living a lie.”–Dominic DeLuca
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 07:24:00 UTC