October 30th, 2018 10:48 AM “JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE” (vocabulary) [W]e justify by rational (internally consistent) means using reason (our ability to compare and decide) due to our logical (biological) facility, which we try to study in that discipline we call ‘logic’, which is nothing more than the grammar of constant relations between terms (references). The thing is that ‘rational’ is a heavily conflated term. So for clarity I avoid rationalize (which is value neutral) and use justify (which is not). |LOGIC| Logical Facility > Reason(Comparison) > Rationalism (Internal Consistency) > Calculation (Transformation) > Computation (Construction). Everything is simple. – Vitruvianism makes metaphysics simple. – The grammars make ‘thinking’ (reason) simple. – Acquisitionism makes psychology simple. – Compatibilism makes sociology simple – Propertarianism makes ethics and law simple. – Group Competitive Strategy makes Government Simple. – All of the above make Aesthetics simple. Everything is simple. A continuous, consistent, grammar of comprehension from the physical to the social to the personal to the mental.
Theme: Truth
-
Everything is simple
October 30th, 2018 10:48 AM “JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE” (vocabulary) [W]e justify by rational (internally consistent) means using reason (our ability to compare and decide) due to our logical (biological) facility, which we try to study in that discipline we call ‘logic’, which is nothing more than the grammar of constant relations between terms (references). The thing is that ‘rational’ is a heavily conflated term. So for clarity I avoid rationalize (which is value neutral) and use justify (which is not). |LOGIC| Logical Facility > Reason(Comparison) > Rationalism (Internal Consistency) > Calculation (Transformation) > Computation (Construction). Everything is simple. – Vitruvianism makes metaphysics simple. – The grammars make ‘thinking’ (reason) simple. – Acquisitionism makes psychology simple. – Compatibilism makes sociology simple – Propertarianism makes ethics and law simple. – Group Competitive Strategy makes Government Simple. – All of the above make Aesthetics simple. Everything is simple. A continuous, consistent, grammar of comprehension from the physical to the social to the personal to the mental.
-
The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About the Argument Used.
October 30th, 2018 10:07 AM IT’S NOT COMPLICATED:
Law (Science)............= Testimony (Measurements) Philosophy(Rationalism)........= Excuse (Justifications) Theology (Fictionalism).......= Fiction (Deception)
The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About The Argument Used.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
October 30th, 2018 10:19 AM WHY WILL PEOPLE WILL RESIST PROPERTARIANISM? (defense of investment in fraud) [P]ropertarianism: All words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs, and arguments consist of measurements accumulating in transactions. Most importantly, propertarian argument makes visible ALL pretense of knowledge – falsifying any claim made with pretense of knowledge. Reciprocity is a value independent test of decidability. With these two tools we can falsify all fraudulent speech (argument). That’s why people FEAR propertarianism. Propertarianism serves its purpose as a formal logic of social science from metaphysics, through epistemology through psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics group evolutionary strategy and aesthetics. Propertarianism is ‘frightening’ to the ‘frauds’ precisely because it will restore the market for fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality upon others. This will deny those who use false language to obtain status and therefore organize non-market action and restore all means of theft. Worse (for the frauds), it eliminates their ability to create false self image and false status signaling thereby ending the competition in the signal (status) economy by fraud. This is why people will resist propertarianism. Because it suppresses lies. Unlike abrahamism, marxism, postmodernism and feminism which enable lies – particularly when industrialized lying was made possible by media and the academy, which could then be used by the state to deceive in order to obtain POWER.
-
The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About the Argument Used.
October 30th, 2018 10:07 AM IT’S NOT COMPLICATED:
Law (Science)............= Testimony (Measurements) Philosophy(Rationalism)........= Excuse (Justifications) Theology (Fictionalism).......= Fiction (Deception)
The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About The Argument Used.
-
Table: The Middle East vs The West
October 30th, 2018 8:15 PM
THEM (MIDDLE EAST) VS US (WEST) Face ..................vs Truth Reasonableness ........vs Decidability Pilpul ................vs Construction Critique ..............vs Falsification Authority .............vs Market Equality ..............vs Hierarchy Proportionality .......vs Reciprocity Herd ..................vs Pack. Feminine ..............vs Masculine
-
Table: The Middle East vs The West
October 30th, 2018 8:15 PM
THEM (MIDDLE EAST) VS US (WEST) Face ..................vs Truth Reasonableness ........vs Decidability Pilpul ................vs Construction Critique ..............vs Falsification Authority .............vs Market Equality ..............vs Hierarchy Proportionality .......vs Reciprocity Herd ..................vs Pack. Feminine ..............vs Masculine
-
IT’S NOT COMPLICATED: Law(Science)…………….. = Testimony (Measurements) P
IT’S NOT COMPLICATED:
Law(Science)…………….. = Testimony (Measurements)
Philosophy(Rationalism) = Excuse (Justifications)
Theology(Fictionalism).. = Fiction ( Deception)
The Grammar Used Tells You Everything About The Argument Used.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 14:08:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057272923604635650
-
by Bill Joslin Truth, as a semantic axiom, with limitless constellations of inte
by Bill Joslin
Truth, as a semantic axiom, with limitless constellations of interpretive frames.
Correspondence presumes an existential frame.
An existential frame provides a means of checking and vetting outside of the presumptions of the context one might bring to an assertion – that being testability of its existence.
This testability then defines the methodology. T
he methodology then presumes the existential frame and uses said method to update the interpretive frame.
By doing so a feedback between interpretation, methodology occurs and is measured by existence (what can be measured or observed – and how) this allows both the interpretive frame and methodology to be updated (both are provisional).
This affords the most robust means of coherence to truth (small ‘t’ truth) in the context of truth as a semantic axiom i.e truthful and honest reporting.
(CD: when you can understand and make that argument on your own, ” you are there “.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 12:24:00 UTC
-
“JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE” (vocabulary) We justify by rational (internally consist
“JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE”
(vocabulary)
We justify by rational (internally consistent) means using reason (our ability to compare and decide) due to our logical (biological) facility, which we try to study in that discipline we call ‘logic’, which is nothing more than the grammar of constant relations between terms (references). The thing is that ‘rational’ is a heavily conflated term. So for clarity I avoid rationalize (which is value neutral) and use justify (which is not).
|LOGIC| Logical Facility > Reason(Comparison) > Rationalism (Internal Consistency) > Calculation (Transformation) > Computation (Construction).
Everything is simple.
– Vitruvianism makes metaphysics simple.
– The grammars make ‘thinking’ (reason) simple.
– Acquisitionism makes psychology simple.
– Compatibilism makes sociology simple
– Propertarianism makes ethics and law simple.
– Group Competitive Strategy makes Government Simple.
– All of the above make Aesthetics simple.
Everything is simple. A continuous, consistent, grammar of comprehension from the physical to the social to the personal to the mental.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 10:48:00 UTC