Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Addicts justify their addictions. Liars justify their lies. Pilpul and Critique

    Addicts justify their addictions. Liars justify their lies. Pilpul and Critique are the method, with special pleading, cherry picking, false equivalency, overstatement, and undue praise the tactics. Addicts lie, using pilpul and critique. Truth is truth. Lies are lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 14:48:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060182280369516547

    Reply addressees: @blackseraphim2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060178736513978368

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060178736513978368

  • POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY. Well, we differ in tolerance for lying

    POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY.

    Well, we differ in tolerance for lying. I have none. You not only tolerate it, but seek to employ it at every opportunity you can get away with.

    So, I solve for truth. You solve for reasonableness. I use the word ‘true’ meaning decidable independent of preference. You use the word true meaning ‘preferable’ because you conflate the true with the ‘reasonable’ (preferable) – and you can get away with it.

    You do this because you can’t help yourself. You can’t help yourself for a combination of genetic and cultural reasons. Your ethic is ‘what can I get away with’, the aristocratic (and my) ethic is ‘what is true regardless of the consequences’.

    Postmodernism holds “what can I get away with normatively and therefore escape stratification and punishment for it, and what can I get away with claiming is ‘true’ and still escape ostracization and punishment for it.

    So yes, it says get rid of European (‘aryan’) morals, get rid of christian morals (germanized christian), and let loose female, french, and jewish non-morality (whatever I can get away with)..

    Why? Because Nietzsche was looking for a positive morality when in fact, as the aryans, europeans, romans, and germanics understood, there is no such thing. Morality is a negative (prohibition), and as such we have negative LAW, rather than positive philosophy and positive religion, and positive cults.

    You can see this in the major works of the civilizations, where the primitive civilizations of the semitic region imposed authoritarian positivism, the indian positive rulership, the chinese collective duty, and the europeans negative law – leaving a LOT of philosophers to propose CHOICES within that law. Rather than ONE SOLUTION CONFLATED with RULE.

    The Europeans/Romans/Germanics (Aryans) stated there was no positive morality, only a negative morality of reciprocity, leaving the MARKET for positive moralities to adapt to the needs of niches (classes).

    The only people to grasp this are the english and the americans – and even they failed to maintain indoctrination into it because they did not fully understand it (which is my job – to make it fully understood).

    But the jews, the french, and white anglo women, have all adopted the female strategy, of ‘what can I get away with’ rather than ‘what can i do without getting away with anything’.

    All positivas are choice. The only TRUTH AND MORALITY IS NEGATIVE. Everything else is just choice.

    Like I said. You only have to open your mouth for us to identify whether you are a positivist and parasite, or a negativist and producer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 09:15:00 UTC

  • Postmodernism Is Just Lying. Here Is Why

    POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY. Well, we differ in tolerance for lying. I have none. You not only tolerate it, but seek to employ it at every opportunity you can get away with. So, I solve for truth. You solve for reasonableness. I use the word ‘true’ meaning decidable independent of preference. You use the word true meaning ‘preferable’ because you conflate the true with the ‘reasonable’ (preferable) – and you can get away with it. You do this because you can’t help yourself. You can’t help yourself for a combination of genetic and cultural reasons. Your ethic is ‘what can I get away with’, the aristocratic (and my) ethic is ‘what is true regardless of the consequences’. Postmodernism holds “what can I get away with normatively and therefore escape stratification and punishment for it, and what can I get away with claiming is ‘true’ and still escape ostracization and punishment for it. So yes, it says get rid of European (‘aryan’) morals, get rid of christian morals (germanized christian), and let loose female, french, and jewish non-morality (whatever I can get away with).. Why? Because Nietzsche was looking for a positive morality when in fact, as the aryans, europeans, romans, and germanics understood, there is no such thing. Morality is a negative (prohibition), and as such we have negative LAW, rather than positive philosophy and positive religion, and positive cults. You can see this in the major works of the civilizations, where the primitive civilizations of the semitic region imposed authoritarian positivism, the indian positive rulership, the chinese collective duty, and the europeans negative law – leaving a LOT of philosophers to propose CHOICES within that law. Rather than ONE SOLUTION CONFLATED with RULE. The Europeans/Romans/Germanics (Aryans) stated there was no positive morality, only a negative morality of reciprocity, leaving the MARKET for positive moralities to adapt to the needs of niches (classes). The only people to grasp this are the english and the americans – and even they failed to maintain indoctrination into it because they did not fully understand it (which is my job – to make it fully understood). But the jews, the french, and white anglo women, have all adopted the female strategy, of ‘what can I get away with’ rather than ‘what can i do without getting away with anything’. All positivas are choice. The only TRUTH AND MORALITY IS NEGATIVE. Everything else is just choice. Like I said. You only have to open your mouth for us to identify whether you are a positivist and parasite, or a negativist and producer.

  • enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

    I started out as a scientist performing research. I evolved into a jurist writing the law. Because of those efforts I wrote down the unwritten philosophy of the west. In doing so I advocate a set of possible choices that we would call a theory of politics today or a philosophy in yesteryear. I have an opinion in the construction of a system of education we call a religion within all of the above. To achieve them I use an ideology to market the set of solutions. So I have produced a complete system of thought entirely in the western group strategy captured in our law, which is our philosophy. But it is not a trivial system. It is a recipe for action. Not one of detachment that like all others limits our responsibility. Just the opposite. To obtain it enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

  • Postmodernism Is Just Lying. Here Is Why

    POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY. Well, we differ in tolerance for lying. I have none. You not only tolerate it, but seek to employ it at every opportunity you can get away with. So, I solve for truth. You solve for reasonableness. I use the word ‘true’ meaning decidable independent of preference. You use the word true meaning ‘preferable’ because you conflate the true with the ‘reasonable’ (preferable) – and you can get away with it. You do this because you can’t help yourself. You can’t help yourself for a combination of genetic and cultural reasons. Your ethic is ‘what can I get away with’, the aristocratic (and my) ethic is ‘what is true regardless of the consequences’. Postmodernism holds “what can I get away with normatively and therefore escape stratification and punishment for it, and what can I get away with claiming is ‘true’ and still escape ostracization and punishment for it. So yes, it says get rid of European (‘aryan’) morals, get rid of christian morals (germanized christian), and let loose female, french, and jewish non-morality (whatever I can get away with).. Why? Because Nietzsche was looking for a positive morality when in fact, as the aryans, europeans, romans, and germanics understood, there is no such thing. Morality is a negative (prohibition), and as such we have negative LAW, rather than positive philosophy and positive religion, and positive cults. You can see this in the major works of the civilizations, where the primitive civilizations of the semitic region imposed authoritarian positivism, the indian positive rulership, the chinese collective duty, and the europeans negative law – leaving a LOT of philosophers to propose CHOICES within that law. Rather than ONE SOLUTION CONFLATED with RULE. The Europeans/Romans/Germanics (Aryans) stated there was no positive morality, only a negative morality of reciprocity, leaving the MARKET for positive moralities to adapt to the needs of niches (classes). The only people to grasp this are the english and the americans – and even they failed to maintain indoctrination into it because they did not fully understand it (which is my job – to make it fully understood). But the jews, the french, and white anglo women, have all adopted the female strategy, of ‘what can I get away with’ rather than ‘what can i do without getting away with anything’. All positivas are choice. The only TRUTH AND MORALITY IS NEGATIVE. Everything else is just choice. Like I said. You only have to open your mouth for us to identify whether you are a positivist and parasite, or a negativist and producer.

  • enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

    I started out as a scientist performing research. I evolved into a jurist writing the law. Because of those efforts I wrote down the unwritten philosophy of the west. In doing so I advocate a set of possible choices that we would call a theory of politics today or a philosophy in yesteryear. I have an opinion in the construction of a system of education we call a religion within all of the above. To achieve them I use an ideology to market the set of solutions. So I have produced a complete system of thought entirely in the western group strategy captured in our law, which is our philosophy. But it is not a trivial system. It is a recipe for action. Not one of detachment that like all others limits our responsibility. Just the opposite. To obtain it enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

  • Nassim: idea: Solving for reasonableness (reverse justification) rather than sol

    Nassim: idea: Solving for reasonableness (reverse justification) rather than solving for decidability (truth: surviving construction and falseification)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 18:44:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059879258120687616

    Reply addressees: @nntaleb @SamHarrisOrg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009872629673717760

    IN REPLY TO:

    @nntaleb

    The other problem with Charlatan @SamHarrisOrg is that he talks about “rationality” without even remotely knowing what it means.

    Charlatan.

    https://t.co/0WwJtmeeGu

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009872629673717760

  • DEEP MEANING —“Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, r

    DEEP MEANING

    —“Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, resulted in the fall of man… Perhaps the fall of man isn’t so much due to acquisition of knowledge but rather shifting the foundation of knowledge from spectra to dichotomy.”— Bill Joslin

    “WOTAN IS TO HELP THE MATURING MAN ABOUT IDENTIFYING THE DETAILS AND NUANCE WITHIN THE MYRIAD OF DEGREES FOUND WITHIN THE SPECTRUM BETWEEN THOSE LIMITS.”

    —“One of the beauties of operational thought is to exhume oneself from arguments of dichotomies to identifying spectra (the range of possibilities within limits).

    Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, resulted in the fall of man… Perhaps the fall of man isn’t so much due to acquisition of knowledge but rather shifting the foundation of knowledge from spectra to dichotomy.

    There isn’t a good Wotan and an evil Wotan – there is only Wotan whose range of action and experience occurs within a spectra…. Like the rest of us – able to be ultimate asses and wise old silver backs with in one life, body and personality….

    And that’s kind of the point. Dichotomies of perfectly good and perfectly bad are only useful to teach children about the tails of a spectrum… To distinguish the tails.

    Wotan is to help the maturing man about identifying the details and nuance within the myriad of degrees found within those limits.” —- Bill Joslin

    (from the “stuff I wish I’d said” department)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 17:37:00 UTC

  • “DEMAND FOR BELIEF IS DEMAND FOR DECEIT” (worth repeating) by Igor Rogov When th

    “DEMAND FOR BELIEF IS DEMAND FOR DECEIT”

    (worth repeating)

    by Igor Rogov

    When they say “I believe women”, it does not mean that they believe women’ statements like a scientific truths, but that they feel something between religious revelatory experience -and- sing-along with real Paul McCartney.

    While participating in the “The Kavanaugh Show” you’d get that special warm sensation, as soon as you follow the tune (gospel), you feel it is true (true to the melody, no false notes) and you are a part of something bigger and better than you.

    Just as in the orchestra and chorus and, perhaps, the Church. It is not the Church of Jesus Christ, but one grand Church nevertheless.

    (The Church of Belief in the Momentum of the Herd as a means of abandoning reason and feeling the elation of safety from predators (ie: reality) in the herd.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 07:31:00 UTC

  • Deep Meaning

    DEEP MEANING —“Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, resulted in the fall of man… Perhaps the fall of man isn’t so much due to acquisition of knowledge but rather shifting the foundation of knowledge from spectra to dichotomy.”— Bill Joslin “WOTAN IS TO HELP THE MATURING MAN ABOUT IDENTIFYING THE DETAILS AND NUANCE WITHIN THE MYRIAD OF DEGREES FOUND WITHIN THE SPECTRUM BETWEEN THOSE LIMITS.” —“One of the beauties of operational thought is to exhume oneself from arguments of dichotomies to identifying spectra (the range of possibilities within limits). Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, resulted in the fall of man… Perhaps the fall of man isn’t so much due to acquisition of knowledge but rather shifting the foundation of knowledge from spectra to dichotomy. There isn’t a good Wotan and an evil Wotan – there is only Wotan whose range of action and experience occurs within a spectra…. Like the rest of us – able to be ultimate asses and wise old silver backs with in one life, body and personality…. And that’s kind of the point. Dichotomies of perfectly good and perfectly bad are only useful to teach children about the tails of a spectrum… To distinguish the tails. Wotan is to help the maturing man about identifying the details and nuance within the myriad of degrees found within those limits.” —- Bill Joslin (from the “stuff I wish I’d said” department)