Theme: Truth

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55837863_10157069668602264_836174848

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55837863_10157069668602264_8361748481416626176_o_10157069668597264.jpg Quote by Michael Abbott

    CurtD: Correct. Although, we can say, conversely, that both freudian theory, and feminine strategy, are genetic expressions of the same interests, and that neither freud nor woman chooses their strategy, but is an animal barely conscious, and simply following baser instinct.Gearóid Walshis there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).Mar 24, 2019, 11:29 AMCurt DoolittleI think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and rewards. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    4. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list.Mar 24, 2019, 11:46 AMGearóid Walshthe best psychoanalytic writing I have seen has been when it’s synthesized with bodywork. then, it’s not storytelling (with some possible emotional dimension) any more. it’s linked to a material and external standard – something I would still consider highly experimental, but at least with some empirical markers.Mar 24, 2019, 11:49 AMMichael D. AbbottI believe that Freud was right about the following: The super-ego comes from man (the father) and when man is removed, the demonic id possesses women, making them hysterical, while men become infantilized and neurotic.Mar 24, 2019, 12:20 PMMichael D. AbbottFreud is currently unpopular, but he was right about some things. In particular, masculine stoicism in society (from fathers) actually locks down the ego’s potential for hysteria, by curtailing its egoism under a kind of masculine oppression of emotion.

    Contrary to leftist ideology, some oppression is in fact righteous.Mar 24, 2019, 12:22 PMGearóid Walshthe superego also somewhat corresponds to the internalized social contract on the collective level.

    it’s very important to look into that – to see if it’s too harsh and debilitating or whether its views withstand testing.Mar 24, 2019, 12:24 PMQuote by Michael Abbott

    CurtD: Correct. Although, we can say, conversely, that both freudian theory, and feminine strategy, are genetic expressions of the same interests, and that neither freud nor woman chooses their strategy, but is an animal barely conscious, and simply following baser instinct.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:12:00 UTC

  • War, Like Truth, Knows No Mercy. Revel in it

    War, Like Truth, Knows No Mercy.

    Revel in it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:10:00 UTC

  • I doubt it. People who MAKE arguments are open to changing their position BY arg

    I doubt it. People who MAKE arguments are open to changing their position BY arguments. People who do not make arguments but promote beliefs, do not change their position because of arguments. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 20:31:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109553189651705856

    Reply addressees: @Rasterdingus @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109546711708520451


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109546711708520451

  • Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement

    Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 15:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109475043975798784

  • There is value in semitic gods, prophets, and myths the way there is value in in

    There is value in semitic gods, prophets, and myths the way there is value in indo european gods, heroes, myths and scientists.

    But there is a vast difference between value and existence.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 21:35:00 UTC

  • THE LIMITS OF THE LAW –“We say only that which is false and irreciprocal. It is

    THE LIMITS OF THE LAW

    –“We say only that which is false and irreciprocal. It is up to those others to decide, from those alternatives that remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE.’– MILITUM DE IURIS NATURAE

    That is the province of the law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 16:52:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109135740754001920

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54520275_10157065187647264_162092370

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54520275_10157065187647264_1620923706937180160_o_10157065187637264.jpg THE LIMITS OF THE LAW

    –“We say only that which is false and irreciprocal. It is up to those others to decide, from those alternatives that remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE.’– MILITUM DE IURIS NATURAE

    That is the province of the law.THE LIMITS OF THE LAW

    –“We say only that which is false and irreciprocal. It is up to those others to decide, from those alternatives that remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE.’– MILITUM DE IURIS NATURAE

    That is the province of the law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 12:52:00 UTC

  • Can you imagine being in a meeting with pretty much anyone who DOESN”T know P, a

    Can you imagine being in a meeting with pretty much anyone who DOESN”T know P, and negotiating or debating with them?

    it’s almost not fair. ALmost. … 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 16:32:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108405854930436098

  • one teaches with parable to suspend disbelief. It is suggestion

    one teaches with parable to suspend disbelief. It is suggestion.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 16:23:00 UTC

  • FAITH IN MY FELLOW MAN TO PREFER A MORAL LAW I have sufficient faith in the aver

    FAITH IN MY FELLOW MAN TO PREFER A MORAL LAW

    I have sufficient faith in the average man that he will prefer to work a little at understanding an absolutely positively moral law closed to abuse and deceit and manipulation, to the existing order of immoral law that he cannot learn, makes little sense, and provides less justice. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 18:00:00 UTC