(FB 1545060768 Timestamp) —“How do we repair our religions? Curt Doolittle, what do you think”—Muhamed Dukmak (a) no more lies (b) make lies prosecutable in court so that the state can’t intervene, (c) prosecute liars for profit until there are no more lies. (d) let our religions adapt to the prohibition on lies, (e) try to organize new religions (which is likely to include restoration of our folk religions), (f) and let the natural self interest of all of us take its course.
Theme: Truth
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545053983 Timestamp) GRAMMARS IN TESTIMONIALISM I use a definition of grammar that limits semantic content to the grammatical operations available. 0) Universal Grammar: (serial, continuous, recursive, disambiguation) 1) Grammar: Limited to dimensions of reality. 2) Semantics: Vocabulary within the limits of the Grammar So you can look at language the old way: semantics on up. Or you can look at language the new way, grammars on down. So when I use ‘grammar’ it is closer to ‘means of communication, advocacy, persuasion, argument, and rejection’.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545060768 Timestamp) —“How do we repair our religions? Curt Doolittle, what do you think”—Muhamed Dukmak (a) no more lies (b) make lies prosecutable in court so that the state can’t intervene, (c) prosecute liars for profit until there are no more lies. (d) let our religions adapt to the prohibition on lies, (e) try to organize new religions (which is likely to include restoration of our folk religions), (f) and let the natural self interest of all of us take its course.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545219478 Timestamp) THE TRUTH IS A HARSH RELIGION –“for a “scientist,” you have an awfully 7th-grade level of religious understanding. just a quick scroll through your feed shows a total lack of discernment when it even comes to the most basic differences between monotheistic faiths, as if you can just say “muh abrahamism” and that somehow means anything as an umbrella term. don’t you think that, if you’re going to claim to be empirical and objective, you should at least take the time to understand what you’re talking about?”—Michael Witcoff (As if my campaign against abrahamic sophism is limited to the old world religions of judaism, christianity, and islam – and the new world religions of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anti-europeanism – as much as it is against the causes of demand for falsehoods, and our ability to provide an alternative due to lack of understanding and costs.) That isnt a criticism. it’s an excuse. religion consists of what existed before 7th grade education, and declines now that we have that education. There is a reason religiosity deceases with intelligence and knowledge. There is a reason religiosity increases with declines in intelligence. There is a reason religiosity increases with diversity and decreases with homogeneity. In other words, religion as you understand it, is symptomatic of ‘the bad’. Yet, there is a reason why we have demand for personal, interpersonal, civic, and political rituals and feasts. there are many ways of supplying that demand. That’s the evidence from around the world and throughout history. The fact that one can scientifically articulate the causes of tht demand and the range of methods of supplying it is no more mysterious than the study of any other human behavior. Sure, it was the hard problem of social science. But that was only because of the poor framing of the work in understanding it. Einstein, Menger and Darwin were revolutionary because of their understanding that the problem was framing. Once you understand the commonality between their discoveries was framing (and once you understand my work for that matter) it is rather easy to see that the problem of religion as behavioral therapy is rather obvious. And therefore the satisfaction of demand for that problem by more constructive means, and eliminating the need for therapy by eliminating its causes: alienation. Patients easily become addicted to their therapists. So your ‘criticism’ that I should ‘understand’ (sympathize) is nothing more than the appeal of the gambler, drunk or addict, for sympathy with the experience of gambling, drunkenness or addiction. I want to and others want to find a form of MEDICATION that is not harmful to the host.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545219478 Timestamp) THE TRUTH IS A HARSH RELIGION –“for a “scientist,” you have an awfully 7th-grade level of religious understanding. just a quick scroll through your feed shows a total lack of discernment when it even comes to the most basic differences between monotheistic faiths, as if you can just say “muh abrahamism” and that somehow means anything as an umbrella term. don’t you think that, if you’re going to claim to be empirical and objective, you should at least take the time to understand what you’re talking about?”—Michael Witcoff (As if my campaign against abrahamic sophism is limited to the old world religions of judaism, christianity, and islam – and the new world religions of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anti-europeanism – as much as it is against the causes of demand for falsehoods, and our ability to provide an alternative due to lack of understanding and costs.) That isnt a criticism. it’s an excuse. religion consists of what existed before 7th grade education, and declines now that we have that education. There is a reason religiosity deceases with intelligence and knowledge. There is a reason religiosity increases with declines in intelligence. There is a reason religiosity increases with diversity and decreases with homogeneity. In other words, religion as you understand it, is symptomatic of ‘the bad’. Yet, there is a reason why we have demand for personal, interpersonal, civic, and political rituals and feasts. there are many ways of supplying that demand. That’s the evidence from around the world and throughout history. The fact that one can scientifically articulate the causes of tht demand and the range of methods of supplying it is no more mysterious than the study of any other human behavior. Sure, it was the hard problem of social science. But that was only because of the poor framing of the work in understanding it. Einstein, Menger and Darwin were revolutionary because of their understanding that the problem was framing. Once you understand the commonality between their discoveries was framing (and once you understand my work for that matter) it is rather easy to see that the problem of religion as behavioral therapy is rather obvious. And therefore the satisfaction of demand for that problem by more constructive means, and eliminating the need for therapy by eliminating its causes: alienation. Patients easily become addicted to their therapists. So your ‘criticism’ that I should ‘understand’ (sympathize) is nothing more than the appeal of the gambler, drunk or addict, for sympathy with the experience of gambling, drunkenness or addiction. I want to and others want to find a form of MEDICATION that is not harmful to the host.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545233227 Timestamp) DECONFLATING PROPERTARIANISM Out of habit, we mix (a) Propertarianism as a social science (a truth), with (b) the use of Propertarianism to produce a Nomocracy as a choice and preference, with (c) the transcendence of man by the civilizational production of agency, by using nomocracy, triparitism (multi-house government), and Markets in Every aspect of life, as the traditional order of the european people. Those are three different things: A science, A Strategy, and An Implementation. There is no ‘possible’ government that cannot be constructed under propertarianism and nomocracy. (ie, anarchy and communism are both impossible,) It just means that one must be truthful in the construction (constitution) of that government – in the construction of the contract for rule. So, under propertarianism (social science), and nomocracy (rule of law), the choice of the terms of the contract under which we organize the economic, social, political, and military functions of society is up to the people who author it.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545233227 Timestamp) DECONFLATING PROPERTARIANISM Out of habit, we mix (a) Propertarianism as a social science (a truth), with (b) the use of Propertarianism to produce a Nomocracy as a choice and preference, with (c) the transcendence of man by the civilizational production of agency, by using nomocracy, triparitism (multi-house government), and Markets in Every aspect of life, as the traditional order of the european people. Those are three different things: A science, A Strategy, and An Implementation. There is no ‘possible’ government that cannot be constructed under propertarianism and nomocracy. (ie, anarchy and communism are both impossible,) It just means that one must be truthful in the construction (constitution) of that government – in the construction of the contract for rule. So, under propertarianism (social science), and nomocracy (rule of law), the choice of the terms of the contract under which we organize the economic, social, political, and military functions of society is up to the people who author it.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545397804 Timestamp) MORE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST FRAUD —“It does not claim that “reality” is socially constructed, that would be ridiculous. It claims that the means by which we conceive of reality is socially constructed, which seems pretty obvious really.”—- Twitterite This is an artful conflation of terms of ‘reality’ (action), and ‘model’. Evidence is very clear that people distinguish between reality and model. The violence in video games being the most current example, or the greco roman distinction between religious myth and reality. So even the the phrase ‘reality is socially constructed’ is an attempted fraud. The model we use to determine action in reality is and must be produced as a market good like any other, and is limited to the supply and demand of that market – like any other. However… …. the narratives and VALUES we use to NEGOTIATE actions in reality are constructed within that market given the references and referents available. In other words, WE SOCIALLY CONSTRUCT LIES, we SCIENTIFICALLY DISCOVER TRUTHS. And those that work by truth compete best. What surprises me is that it’s not obvious that there is a difference between reality and action and cost and imagination and speech, and not bearing a cost – and that those of us who have achieved in life in the markets for force and commerce, and those who achieve in life … … in the market for fraud, are readily distinguished by whether we use the languages of truth, science, economics, and law, or the language of utility, theology, philosophy, and morality. The fact that you (anyone who subscribes to neo-abrahamism) are speaking about the pseudoscientific origins of such a thing,rather than the GOALS TO ACHIEVE WITH IT, is merely another alt-right nerd-variation on memes. Yeah. Meme’s are fun. Yeah. Sophism is fun. Yes you’re witty. But in the end you’re just poisoning the same well we eventually drink from. Words and priests are cheap, unwarrantied, and without cost. artists, soldiers, craftsmen, engineers, lawyers, accountants, executives, and financiers ACT to produce an end for which they pay the cost. Social construction refers to our ability to create narratives like priests do that cost us nothing, but force costs on the people, by the process of creating moral hazard, by the process of diversion from truth. period. You aren’t philosophers or scientists, but sophists using the ancient technique of deceit by priests with the pretension of special knowledge that doesn’t exist,to fool by complex language and suggestion those who are suckers -and the first sucker is always the man in the mirror.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545321894 Timestamp) ORGANIZED TRUTH SUPPRESSION HERE ON FB It appears that Andrew Taylor (who I don’t know) and Claire Khaw – an asian-brit, of questionable mental ability and unquestionable mental instability, who is an apologist for authoritarian religion – particularly islam – are attempting to get me (us) shadow banned by inviting muslim fanatics to our pages, and creating multiple sock accounts, and then having them report us. This is why we are so careful with filtering friend requests and follows. We had the same problem with another woman who shall remain nameless. Anyway, that’s why some of you are seeing shadow ban activity. I don’t quite have my arms around the FB algorithm yet but it does seem to require numbers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545320274 Timestamp) Sure, gods exist in the minds of men, but so do numbers, math, chemistry, biology, history, socrates, and gandalf – and with the same consequences: our display word and deeds are influence heavily if not entirely determined by them.