Truth is prosecuted. Lies are sold.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-29 17:44:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122919581708800000
Theme: Truth
-
Truth is prosecuted. Lies are sold
Truth is prosecuted. Lies are sold.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-29 17:43:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122919458178326528
Reply addressees: @RBartou
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122914296227422208
IN REPLY TO:
@RBartou
@curtdoolittle Frameworks require property of evidence: non-customers incentives diminish. Without performance towards ideology, likewise as other -isms.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122914296227422208
-
Yeah they do. They’re arguing rather than asking questions. Or engaging in fraud
Yeah they do. They’re arguing rather than asking questions. Or engaging in fraud rather than the pursuit of truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-29 00:27:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122658696801259521
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122486539827724288
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
They should come with some:
“One problem with arguing with ignorant people is that they don’t usually have indicator lights that tell you exactly how ignorant they are. This matters when you’re trying to explain something: it’s not always clear how much goes without saying.” https://t.co/gCHXLdPIkwOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122486539827724288
-
@JonHaidt RE: MFT: Fairness Foundation: Facets: Proportionality(F) vs Reciprocit
@JonHaidt RE: MFT: Fairness Foundation: Facets: Proportionality(F) vs Reciprocity(M). Also: Face(F) vs Truth[Fact](M). Kin(F) vs Commons(M). MFT like Big5 needs factors into cog bias facets and subfacets,&MFT Biological basis maps to Cloninger. Is anyone working on this? -Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-25 16:44:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1121455056157642752
-
Charles,they practice neither truth, nor consistency, nor reciprocity, nor intel
Charles,they practice neither truth, nor consistency, nor reciprocity, nor intellectual honesty, but mere sentimental pragmatism and parasitism. It’s why we’re incompatible. And with prosperity we specialize and diversify interests. Hence the dirty words secession and separation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-20 18:07:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1119663974520324102
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1119552582358269953
IN REPLY TO:
@charlesmurray
Just one little quote from me to substantiate the “white supremacist” charge, please. Just one. https://t.co/w9yB3zHyxR
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1119552582358269953
-
Not True. Truth is truth. And truth is enough. I quote you all the time, and I h
Not True. Truth is truth. And truth is enough. I quote you all the time, and I haven’t found anything to disagree with you on other than terminology (group selection). The problem isn’t race. It’s eradication of or displacement of the their race, and ending truth and rule of law. https://twitter.com/JayMan471/status/1119609082804088833
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-20 17:39:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1119656807574716428
-
Kind people give me energy. Intellectually honest people make me relax. Stupid p
Kind people give me energy.
Intellectually honest people make me relax.
Stupid people make me very, very, tired.
Overconfident young men make me frustrated.
But at least the king of the hill game works.
It’s just hard work really. lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-19 17:10:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1119287041101942785
-
I don’t like ‘debates’ because outside of upper academic circles, they’re not wo
I don’t like ‘debates’ because outside of upper academic circles, they’re not worth my time, largely because activists are overcommitted to their near universally faulty priors. I do however love conversations. And conversations with smart people are helpful for the audience.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-17 16:25:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118551073101373441
Reply addressees: @TsarOfNEETs @JoeRossRanchFan @ethnarch_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118359351847202817
IN REPLY TO:
@WraySwore
@curtdoolittle @JoeRossRanchFan @ethnarch_ He’s a rotating cohost on FtN. Very thoughtful and knowledgeable. It would be a a great, honest debate between you two (if it were to happen)
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118359351847202817
-
If you write operationally and with minimum use of the verb to be, you will achi
If you write operationally and with minimum use of the verb to be, you will achieve what you are suggesting. The problem is people use those ‘cheats’ you suggest because they don’t know of what they speak, and want to intellectually or emotionally load it to compensate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-17 14:55:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118528326329671680
Reply addressees: @jayvanbavel @JonHaidt @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118228007204921344
IN REPLY TO:
@jayvanbavel
Clear #writing is one of the most useful skills you can develop
These 13 tips from @sapinker are a great start – he is a master of the psychology of writing.
https://t.co/MqVRIDvgdT https://t.co/nxoZcxbKfTOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118228007204921344
-
@JonHaidt Have you done, or do you know of, any work on Face, Face vs Truth vs H
@JonHaidt Have you done, or do you know of, any work on Face, Face vs Truth vs Hierarchy? Or Loyalty to Kin, Association, or Polity? And whether these modify Moral Foundations measurements? It’s more of an international subject, but wondering if you’ve seen anything. -thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-17 14:49:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118527021854941185