Theme: Truth

—Are you capable of making ONE rebuttal that doesn’t result to personal attack? GSRRM all over this.—Victoria Medley
In any argument that is untruthful (unscientific) or attempts to shame, i use a very simple method that I publish frequently:(a) return the same (gsrrm)(b) provide answers or education to improve understanding (c) repeat the central argument, (d) repeat until the person… i) understands, (consent, success)… ii) goes away to think (undecided, conditional)… iii) demonstrates exhaustion, frustration, or anger. (failure)(e) never give up because immoral, stupid, and wrong will always be defeated by moral, intelligent, and true.
So I always return GSRRM as punishment for using it, as a means of educating the opposition in their tactic, and removing its utility through exposition.
In other words, use argumentative opportunity to educate. Vary it by intellectual honesty, degree of previous consideration of the subject, and degree of empirical evidence to support position. I basically abuse intellectually dishonest people into frustration; incrementally educate intellectually honest but overconfident (ignorant) people. and I just fking answer questions…. lol.
It takes YEARS for some people to come around. And only a few of them every make it to disambiguation, serialization, reciprocity, supply, and demand.
I can count those people on my fingers. It’s fking hard.Hence the need for course and book.Hence the need for different explanations for different classes each of which is searching for how it’s relevant and beneficial to them.