Theme: Truth

  • Deliver unto any gods…

    “Deliver faith and obedience to any gods compatible with natural law. Deliver Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity to mankind because Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity ARE the natural law.”

    Christianity survives under natural law as does all literature under natural law, in that the parables advocate natural law, despite being stated in language and grammar of myth, instead of the language and grammar of Testimony (law). Deliver faith and obedience to any gods compatible with natural law. Deliver Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity to mankind because Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity ARE the natural law.

  • On Intelligent Design: I Support Truthful Speech

    —“Are you saying you support darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?”—Mark E. Haney

    1 – I cannot falsify evolution, and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the universe to the imagination of man is a product of a very small number of possibilities in very great permutation, just as limited numbers of sounds, characters, and numbers can be arranged in infinitely complex permutations. 2 – The five rules of christianity are,logically, rationally(incentives), scientifically(empirically) the optimum prisoner’s dilemma (trust building) strategy, and I cannot falsify either or their relation. There is a reason christians are wealthier than competing cults. 3 – Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time. I cannot falsify that statement – it’s a physical and logical impossibility. As to what I ‘Support’: I support truthful speech. Truthful speech can only consist of what I can testify to. I can only testify to that which is: … – categorically consistent … – logically consistent … – empirically(observably) consistent … – operationally consistent … – rationally consistent … – reciprocally consistent where it is: … – parsimonious … – scope consistent … – and fully accounted … – within stated limits and where … – due diligence has been demonstrated, and where … – one’s statements are warrantied by restitution if one errs. I cannot testify to anything other than. 1. Realism, 2. Naturalism, 3. Operationalism Christianity survives under natural law as does all literature under natural law, in that the parables advocate natural law, despite being stated in language and grammar of myth, instead of the language and grammar of Testimony (law). Deliver faith and obedience to any gods compatible with natural law. Deliver Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity to mankind because Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity ARE the natural law.

    —“The point is, you don’t have to believe in anything supernatural to understand why natural law works. In fact, it hinders you. But as long as we both believe in the natural law, regardless of where it comes from, we can still be allies. I have to have faith in that law to deliver but that’s all. You believe whatever you want but in reality, evolution is the most intelligent design possible.”—Martin Štěpán

  • On Intelligent Design: I Support Truthful Speech

    —“Are you saying you support darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?”—Mark E. Haney

    1 – I cannot falsify evolution, and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the universe to the imagination of man is a product of a very small number of possibilities in very great permutation, just as limited numbers of sounds, characters, and numbers can be arranged in infinitely complex permutations. 2 – The five rules of christianity are,logically, rationally(incentives), scientifically(empirically) the optimum prisoner’s dilemma (trust building) strategy, and I cannot falsify either or their relation. There is a reason christians are wealthier than competing cults. 3 – Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time. I cannot falsify that statement – it’s a physical and logical impossibility. As to what I ‘Support’: I support truthful speech. Truthful speech can only consist of what I can testify to. I can only testify to that which is: … – categorically consistent … – logically consistent … – empirically(observably) consistent … – operationally consistent … – rationally consistent … – reciprocally consistent where it is: … – parsimonious … – scope consistent … – and fully accounted … – within stated limits and where … – due diligence has been demonstrated, and where … – one’s statements are warrantied by restitution if one errs. I cannot testify to anything other than. 1. Realism, 2. Naturalism, 3. Operationalism Christianity survives under natural law as does all literature under natural law, in that the parables advocate natural law, despite being stated in language and grammar of myth, instead of the language and grammar of Testimony (law). Deliver faith and obedience to any gods compatible with natural law. Deliver Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity to mankind because Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity ARE the natural law.

    —“The point is, you don’t have to believe in anything supernatural to understand why natural law works. In fact, it hinders you. But as long as we both believe in the natural law, regardless of where it comes from, we can still be allies. I have to have faith in that law to deliver but that’s all. You believe whatever you want but in reality, evolution is the most intelligent design possible.”—Martin Štěpán

  • Disambiguation: Confidence vs Faith

    You have CONFIDENCE in the law, because of the EVIDENCE of the law. One has Faith in that which one has no evidence by which to produce confidence. Disambiguation is central to the method of propertarianism. We don’t let people lie by conflation of real, ideal, pseudoscientific, and supernatural.

  • Disambiguation: Confidence vs Faith

    You have CONFIDENCE in the law, because of the EVIDENCE of the law. One has Faith in that which one has no evidence by which to produce confidence. Disambiguation is central to the method of propertarianism. We don’t let people lie by conflation of real, ideal, pseudoscientific, and supernatural.

  • You can’t testify, nor can he, to what he is saying. She can. I can

    You can’t testify, nor can he, to what he is saying. She can. I can.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 07:04:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165157808431648768

    Reply addressees: @ThirtyTyrants @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165137229150392322


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ThirtyTyrants

    @curtdoolittle @clairlemon Don’t be silly, she’s just trying to build her brand. And she can’t refute anything he says, even if it’s wrong.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165137229150392322

  • Mark E. Haney are you saying you support darwanism over Christianity or intellig

    Mark E. Haney are you saying you support darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?

    1 – I cannot falsify evolution and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=453761418554087&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 06:47:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165153584645844992

  • I write about this subject quite a bit because there are two origins to pervasiv

    I write about this subject quite a bit because there are two origins to pervasive sophism in western civilization, regardless of field: mathematical idealism, and scriptural interpretation. Both of which stem from the same error.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:21:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165101703483539456

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon Mathematics is the most simple of the logics, the logic of positional names. The greeks did everything with geometry. There is a good reason. Measurements (real) vs Language (ideal). And stuck with the consequences of treating math as a language – where nonsense can be said.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon Mathematics is the most simple of the logics, the logic of positional names. The greeks did everything with geometry. There is a good reason. Measurements (real) vs Language (ideal). And stuck with the consequences of treating math as a language – where nonsense can be said.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294

  • There is a great deal of woo woo in Mathematics – mathematical platonism, mathem

    There is a great deal of woo woo in Mathematics – mathematical platonism, mathematical idealism, cantorian multiple infinities, many worlds, proof being positiva rather than negativa, the terms, labels, and symbolism all create nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:15:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165100255014248448

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165027124782092289


    IN REPLY TO:

    @clairlemon

    More evidence that mathematicians can be stupid, too https://t.co/yzrDpx0vAW

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165027124782092289

  • EVOLUTION VS INTELLIGENT DESIGN (core) —“Are you saying you support Darwanism

    EVOLUTION VS INTELLIGENT DESIGN

    (core)

    —“Are you saying you support Darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?”—Mark E. Haney

    1 – I cannot falsify evolution and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the universe to the imagination of man is a product of a very small number of possibilities in very great permutation, just as limited numbers of sounds, characters, and numbers can be arranged in infinitely complex permutations.

    2 – The five rules of christianity are,logically, rationally(incentives), scientifically(empirically) the optimum prisoner’s dilemma (trust building) strategy, and I cannot falsify either or their relation. There is a reason christians are wealthier than competing cults.

    3 – Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time. I cannot falsify that statement – it’s a physical and logical impossibility.

    As to what I ‘Support’:

    I support truthful speech.

    Truthful speech can only consist of what I can testify to.

    I can only testify to that which is:

    – categorically consistent

    – Logically consistent

    – empirically(observably) consistent

    – operationally consistent

    – rationally consistent

    – reciprocally consistent

    where

    – parsimonious

    – scope consistent

    – and fully accounted

    – within stated limits

    and where

    – due diligence has been demonstrated,

    and where

    – one’s statements are warrantied by restitution if one errs.

    I cannot testify to anything other than.

    1. Realism,

    2. Naturalism,

    3. Operationalism

    Nor can anyone else.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 02:47:00 UTC