—“As our ability to select that which is in accordance with truth increases, we converge on godhood, whereas I define God (Gnon) as the self-organizing system of the Universe, the invisible hand of nature.”— Martin ล tฤpรกn
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-31 08:29:00 UTC
@Azure Amaranthine You really aren’t up to this category of arguments – or concepts. Let me help you. 1 – The culmination of 20th century investigation into the scientific method was that there is no via-positiva scientific method – nor is there any via-positiva logic. Instead, the scientific method consists of producing testifiable testimony regardless of via positiva method of investigation, and the logics test the consistency of constant relations from given premises. 2 – In case you didn’t grasp it the first time: Determinism(ideal), Deterministic(within limits), Determinable (within limits), just as Truth (ideal), Truth (within limits of speech), and Truthful (within limits of testimony). 3) The universe is deterministic (describable by rules of arbitrary precision), but not does not fit determinism (the scale of the universe and causal density at lowest scales makes a general rule of infinite precision (at present) unlikely, whereas we can, and have, produced (identified) many general rules of arbitrary(scale within paradigm) precision. So gain, Please. Dispense your sophims upon those who are impressed, by your desperate search for dominance expression, and leave those of us who are adults (and men) to do our duty: protecting the informational commons from overconfident men and solipsistic women.
@Azure Amaranthine You really aren’t up to this category of arguments – or concepts. Let me help you. 1 – The culmination of 20th century investigation into the scientific method was that there is no via-positiva scientific method – nor is there any via-positiva logic. Instead, the scientific method consists of producing testifiable testimony regardless of via positiva method of investigation, and the logics test the consistency of constant relations from given premises. 2 – In case you didn’t grasp it the first time: Determinism(ideal), Deterministic(within limits), Determinable (within limits), just as Truth (ideal), Truth (within limits of speech), and Truthful (within limits of testimony). 3) The universe is deterministic (describable by rules of arbitrary precision), but not does not fit determinism (the scale of the universe and causal density at lowest scales makes a general rule of infinite precision (at present) unlikely, whereas we can, and have, produced (identified) many general rules of arbitrary(scale within paradigm) precision. So gain, Please. Dispense your sophims upon those who are impressed, by your desperate search for dominance expression, and leave those of us who are adults (and men) to do our duty: protecting the informational commons from overconfident men and solipsistic women.
Theology is an attempt to conflate Myth, History, and Law in order to suppress truthful testimony. Most everything else (justification, moralizing, psychologizing, GSRRM) are just various sophisms of deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:39:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167099577796894725
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosophy, wisdom lit (china, india), theology(semitia, europa), and mysticism is in the dimensions of permissible content and operations on it. Philosophy is a derivation of law, and Science of Testimony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosophy, wisdom lit (china, india), theology(semitia, europa), and mysticism is in the dimensions of permissible content and operations on it. Philosophy is a derivation of law, and Science of Testimony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039
The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosophy, wisdom lit (china, india), theology(semitia, europa), and mysticism is in the dimensions of permissible content and operations on it. Philosophy is a derivation of law, and Science of Testimony.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:38:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz Syntax no. Grammar yes. Grammar meaning “Rules of continuous disambiguation limited to given constraints and the vocabulary likewise limited ot such given constraints.”
In other words science, philosophy, theology (formal) vs opinion, justification, moralizing, psychologizing.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz Syntax no. Grammar yes. Grammar meaning “Rules of continuous disambiguation limited to given constraints and the vocabulary likewise limited ot such given constraints.”
In other words science, philosophy, theology (formal) vs opinion, justification, moralizing, psychologizing.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893
One does not agree with evidence, it is simply what it is. And empirically you are incorrect. Which doesn’t surprise me. ๐
Now go play in the kiddie pool and leave adult arguments for adult minds.
Don’t waste my time. Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:29:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167097054415507461
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095287480864769
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable โ we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095287480864769
You can claim that Stefan didn’t produce a durable work of philosophy – and that would be true (Zizek either). And that it is difficult to disambiguate from self help (wisdom) rather than decidability (truth). But he practices the grammar of philosophy, and has produced a work.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:26:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167096174597292032
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
There is, empirically, a demarcation between philosopher/philosophizing the demarcation is a) the internal consistency (grammar of constant relations) that the speaker relies upon for his arguments and b) the publication of a work of at least one novel idea in that grammar.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:16:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167093627732078592
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167089384455208960
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable โ we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167089384455208960
This is true. It is also an anathema to people malinvested in sophism and fantasy moral and political literature. ๐
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 12:47:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167056227748253696
Reply addressees: @PseudoHeraclite @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167053186038976512
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable โ we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167053186038976512
I am not into any such thing. I am into heroism, excellence, truth and reciprocity. That means there are only so many criteria of decidability and they are all evolutionary.
Men have other psychological needs are satisfied by every kind of falsehood, fantasy, and drug is a given.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 20:54:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1166816275722571776
Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1166806466201886721
IN REPLY TO:
@FullAccountant
@curtdoolittle You are into all of this transcending human limits and intergalactic space exploration nonsense. The pursuit of immortality. How very INTJ of you. But your arrogance blinds you master Doolittle, that will be your folly.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1166806466201886721