Theme: Truth

  • “It also emerges that the failure to recognize women as human”– No, just that w

    —“It also emerges that the failure to recognize women as human”– No, just that women are unequal to men in the foundations of european successes: truth, reciprocity, duty, markets, and meritocracy, and so far have demanded concessions in every aspect of life to accommodate.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227515734417408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Our success that made women’s ‘liberation’ from household chores, and productive enough to hire substitute mothers, was the product of 1500+years of eugenics, as much as it was our strange male obsession with truth reciprocity and institutions of continuous competition.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Our success that made women’s ‘liberation’ from household chores, and productive enough to hire substitute mothers, was the product of 1500+years of eugenics, as much as it was our strange male obsession with truth reciprocity and institutions of continuous competition.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082

  • WHY MISOGYNY? Presumption: Why do women confuse rejection, disapproval, restrain

    WHY MISOGYNY?
    Presumption: Why do women confuse rejection, disapproval, restraint from reciprocity with emotional disapproval (hate)? Why do women not argue truth or falsehood, reciprocity vs reciprocity? Why do women engage in endless conflict by Undermining … vs Exchange?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227509027651584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne
    Short Answer:
    Q: “When will women be human? When?” asked feminist legal theorist, Catharine A. MacKinnon, in a 1999 essay.
    A: When Truth, Productive and Accumulative, and Eugenic, take precedence over Approval, Consumption and Dysgenia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne
    Short Answer:
    Q: “When will women be human? When?” asked feminist legal theorist, Catharine A. MacKinnon, in a 1999 essay.
    A: When Truth, Productive and Accumulative, and Eugenic, take precedence over Approval, Consumption and Dysgenia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336

  • NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne Short Answer: Q: “When will women be hum

    NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne
    Short Answer:
    Q: “When will women be human? When?” asked feminist legal theorist, Catharine A. MacKinnon, in a 1999 essay.
    A: When Truth, Productive and Accumulative, and Eugenic, take precedence over Approval, Consumption and Dysgenia.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336

  • This is rule of law of by individual sovereignty, and therefore reciprocity, tru

    This is rule of law of by individual sovereignty, and therefore reciprocity, truth regardless of cost, meritocracy – the Natural Law. The Monarchy is the Judge of Last Resort thereby limiting the damage by the fashions of the people. Go home. Nationalism Returns. You’re done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 15:08:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183761431734472705

    Reply addressees: @aamirrahman21 @CGTNOfficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183748518055501829


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183748518055501829

  • DISAMIBIGUATION … Confidence (Real, Self, High ) – I have confidence in … ..

    DISAMIBIGUATION

    … Confidence (Real, Self, High ) – I have confidence in …

    … … Belief (ideal, Consensus, Medium) – I believe …

    … … … Faith (supernatural, Authority, Low) – I have faith in …

    … … … … Conviction (Ideal, Self, Medium,) – My conviction…

    Confidence in evidence

    Belief in reason

    Faith in intuition

    Conviction in decision.

    I avoid the words belief and faith.

    I use:

    … ‘as far as I know’

    … ‘i can’t falsify’

    or

    … ‘it’s not decidable’

    … ‘it’s a preference or a good not a truth’

    I should also use:

    … ‘i have confidence in’


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 09:21:00 UTC

  • WE AREN’T ENEMIES, NOT IN THE LEAST, UNITED BY NATURAL LAW —“No, neither of us

    WE AREN’T ENEMIES, NOT IN THE LEAST, UNITED BY NATURAL LAW

    —“No, neither of us advocates forcing people to believe anything. All we demand is that due diligence against error, bias and deceit be made in all speech to public (commercial, academic, political etc.). All this means for Christians is to either keep their faith a private matter or, if they feel the need to speak about matters of faith to public, to do so only as a matter of faith, with no pretense of speaking an objective truth. … We’re not enemies, not in the slightest. We just have to agree that the natural law is what unites us.”– Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 20:32:00 UTC

  • RT @ClownBa73413423: @curtdoolittle Which one am I? The autistic nerd who likes

    RT @ClownBa73413423: @curtdoolittle Which one am I? The autistic nerd who likes truth. I don’t need to be king, ruler, or engineer to prefe…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 14:40:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183029628409208832

  • THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ERROR AND FRAUD —“The difference between error and frau

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ERROR AND FRAUD

    —“The difference between error and fraud is that an error implies good intentions, and people want to trade in their good intentions for a discount on the costs they themselves pay for the results of their error.”—Rustle More


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 13:45:00 UTC

  • JOHN MARK EXPLAINS MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY (core)(important) To John’s Thoug

    JOHN MARK EXPLAINS MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY

    (core)(important)

    To John’s Thoughts, I’ll add this:

    1. SUPPRESSION OF FALSEHOOD AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – My work has a nearly single minded objective, and that ending lying in public speech. So, I’m not complaining about just christianity, but the falsehoods by which the abrahamic religions are constructed, the means of conveying those falsehoods, the consequences of teaching christians how to lie using the abrahamic method, and the consequences of christians lying using the abrahamic method, that makes the entire polity vulnerable to marxist, feminine, postmodern pseudoscience, sophism and denial, just as christianity judaism and islam were spread by supernaturalism, sophism, and denial of reality. As such my objective is the opposite of Augustine and Aquinas, which is to integrate greek reason into christianity on supernatural terms, and instead integrate christianity into western science and reason on scientific terms.

    2. A POLITICAL RELIGION – Christianity, when expressed in secular scientific terms, is in fact an optimum SOCIAL and adequate PERSONAL religion even if it is not an optimum POLITICAL religion -which is why it failed to achieve what islam and judaism did, and why it has declined rapidly in the modern era. My goal is to license political religion so that we cannot be undermined again.

    2. RESTORING A STATE RELIGION TO EXLUDE OTHERS – I’m trying to discover a way to make christianity a state religion by converting it to secular terms – this is possible because christianity and only christianity among the abrahamic religions is compatible with natural law. Christians despise the fact that the lessons of christianity in scientific terms, are optimum strategies for social cooperation at least at interpersonal scale. Because the magic and ‘woo woo’ is lost by doing so restoring dependence upon reason, instead of allowing us to fall into pacifist intuition where we can abandon reason. (which is why religions work to sedate humans.) So over the long term I work to produce a christian law that is inviolate, like sharia, so to speak, from the natural law, and the christian extension of the natural law, by the exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation or prosecution.

    3. RESTORING THE BALANCE OF POWERS – If I can convert Christianity to secular terms I can restore the church as the political agency responsible for the individual and family, limiting the government to the material, and restore competition between family-church and commerce-government, and military-state. It is this division and competition i’m seeking to restore. (I don’t tell you these things because they taint the audience by letting them know my purposes. I only explain afterward, so that my attacks on any given subject make sense in retrospect. In other words, I’m a scientist. I run tests. The public willing to engage in intellectually honest discourse serves as my testing laboratory.)

    4. MULTIPLE CLASSES MULTIPLE RELIGIONS, SAME MESSAGE – All religions are class religions. Westerners practice a personal religion of Jesus (lower), a social religion of christianity (middle), an secular religion of philosophy (upper middle), a political religion of the law and the sciences that extend the law (upper). The Chinese have confucianism, the Dao, and buddhism, nationalism and familialism. Every culture other than judaism and islam have class religions. And we have and need our class religions.

    5. MULTIPLE GENDERS: ADD MASCULINITY TO RELIGION – There are those of us for whom the philosophy of secular christianity – it’s cooperation – is merely valuable, but for whom our ancestors, culture, nation, civilization are more precious than the false promise of an evil semitic god. And so if we categorize heathenry as the thanks to nature not denial of it, and paganism as thanks to heroes of our history, and the archetypes that are non-submissive to nature and heroic in achievement rather than heroic in tolerance. So I am continuing my process of investigation into whether it is possible to unite these scientific, natural, and christian, traditions in a constitution, that prohibits competition by which to undermine them. And whether they can be practiced together or separately. So again, I see myself trying to unite western civilization against further destruction. And I am doing so by the same means as did those great men who came before me, in every great time of change.

    THE METHOD TO THE APPARENT MADNESS

    There is a deep method to the appearance of my madness. Do not assume you grasp what I am doing. Much of what I do requires I maintain your ignorance of what I am doing, in order to ensure I collect quality information from the population. This is how all behavioral science must be conducted. And it’s how I conduct it.

    – CurtUpdated Oct 12, 2019, 11:12 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:12:00 UTC

  • MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY (core)(important) To John’s explanation, I’ll add th

    MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY

    (core)(important)

    To John’s explanation, I’ll add this:

    1. SUPPRESSION OF FALSEHOOD AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – My work has a nearly single minded objective, and that ending lying in public speech. So, I’m not complaining about just christianity, but the falsehoods by which the abrahamic religions are constructed, the means of conveying those falsehoods, the consequences of teaching christians how to lie using the abrahamic method, and the consequences of christians lying using the abrahamic method, that makes the entire polity vulnerable to marxist, feminine, postmodern pseudoscience, sophism and denial, just as christianity judaism and islam were spread by supernaturalism, sophism, and denial of reality. As such my objective is the opposite of Augustine and Aquinas, which is to integrate greek reason into christianity on supernatural terms, and instead integrate christianity into western science and reason on scientific terms.

    2. A POLITICAL RELIGION – Christianity, when expressed in secular scientific terms, is in fact an optimum SOCIAL and adequate PERSONAL religion even if it is not an optimum POLITICAL religion -which is why it failed to achieve what islam and judaism did, and why it has declined rapidly in the modern era. My goal is to license political religion so that we cannot be undermined again.

    2. RESTORING A STATE RELIGION TO EXLUDE OTHERS – I’m trying to discover a way to make christianity a state religion by converting it to secular terms – this is possible because christianity and only christianity among the abrahamic religions is compatible with natural law. Christians despise the fact that the lessons of christianity in scientific terms, are optimum strategies for social cooperation at least at interpersonal scale. Because the magic and ‘woo woo’ is lost by doing so restoring dependence upon reason, instead of allowing us to fall into pacifist intuition where we can abandon reason. (which is why religions work to sedate humans.) So over the long term I work to produce a christian law that is inviolate, like sharia, so to speak, from the natural law, and the christian extension of the natural law, by the exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation or prosecution.

    3. RESTORING THE BALANCE OF POWERS – If I can convert Christianity to secular terms I can restore the church as the political agency responsible for the individual and family, limiting the government to the material, and restore competition between family-church and commerce-government, and military-state. It is this division and competition i’m seeking to restore. (I don’t tell you these things because they taint the audience by letting them know my purposes. I only explain afterward, so that my attacks on any given subject make sense in retrospect. In other words, I’m a scientist. I run tests. The public willing to engage in intellectually honest discourse serves as my testing laboratory.)

    4. MULTIPLE CLASSES MULTIPLE RELIGIONS, SAME MESSAGE – All religions are class religions. Westerners practice a personal religion of Jesus (lower), a social religion of christianity (middle), an secular religion of philosophy (upper middle), a political religion of the law and the sciences that extend the law (upper). The Chinese have confucianism, the Dao, and buddhism, nationalism and familialism. Every culture other than judaism and islam have class religions. And we have and need our class religions.

    5. MULTIPLE GENDERS: ADD MASCULINITY TO RELIGION – There are those of us for whom the philosophy of secular christianity – it’s cooperation – is merely valuable, but for whom our ancestors, culture, nation, civilization are more precious than the false promise of an evil semitic god. And so if we categorize heathenry as the thanks to nature not denial of it, and paganism as thanks to heroes of our history, and the archetypes that are non-submissive to nature and heroic in achievement rather than heroic in tolerance. So I am continuing my process of investigation into whether it is possible to unite these scientific, natural, and christian, traditions in a constitution, that prohibits competition by which to undermine them. And whether they can be practiced together or separately. So again, I see myself trying to unite western civilization against further destruction. And I am doing so by the same means as did those great men who came before me, in every great time of change.

    There is a deep method to the appearance of my madness. Do not assume you grasp what I am doing. Much of what I do requires I maintain your ignorance of what I am doing, in order to ensure I collect quality information from the population. This is how all behavioral science must be conducted. And it’s how I conduct it.

    – Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:12:00 UTC