Mar 31, 2020, 3:39 PM They are too primitive. They start with god (submission) rather than sovereignty ( responsibility). They don’t include truthful speech regardless of cost. They don’t prevent the great crimes of history (sophistry, false promise, baiting into hazard, fraud) Instead they are the origin of the license for the great crimes of history. They aren’t the source of good. They are the source of evil. Why? Because any half truth spreads ignorance.
Theme: Truth
-
Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉
Mar 31, 2020, 3:39 PM They are too primitive. They start with god (submission) rather than sovereignty ( responsibility). They don’t include truthful speech regardless of cost. They don’t prevent the great crimes of history (sophistry, false promise, baiting into hazard, fraud) Instead they are the origin of the license for the great crimes of history. They aren’t the source of good. They are the source of evil. Why? Because any half truth spreads ignorance.
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
Mar 31, 2020, 8:27 PM Minor expansion of Natural Law
–“The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (ingroup defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (outgroups).”—
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” (ie: test of limits and full accounting.)
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
Mar 31, 2020, 8:27 PM Minor expansion of Natural Law
–“The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (ingroup defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (outgroups).”—
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” (ie: test of limits and full accounting.)
-
The Difficult Idea to Get Across
Apr 1, 2020, 12:27 PM (important) When I say “the big problem is switching people from idealism (homogenous bias) under which each person seeks whatever bias fits his, to realism (heterogeneous bias) that is aware of the market competition. In other words, monopoly is endemic in western moral thinking bcause we’ve been homogenous since our beginnings. So we have no means of defense against the LIE of the value of diversity. This is yet another example of the f—king stupidity of libertarian tropes (sophistry). If you build high trust high value commons, then diversity increases transaction costs that all ancestors worked to reduce. So the reason we seek SOME diversity is to increase novelty because we seek to hyper-consume cheap novelty (consumption that destroys commons) rather than expensive novelty (innovation, continued capitalization of commons). I don’t know how to explain this more simply. I would appreciate anyone who could. Leftists spend down inheritance to feed herd instinct for numbers.
-
The Difficult Idea to Get Across
Apr 1, 2020, 12:27 PM (important) When I say “the big problem is switching people from idealism (homogenous bias) under which each person seeks whatever bias fits his, to realism (heterogeneous bias) that is aware of the market competition. In other words, monopoly is endemic in western moral thinking bcause we’ve been homogenous since our beginnings. So we have no means of defense against the LIE of the value of diversity. This is yet another example of the f—king stupidity of libertarian tropes (sophistry). If you build high trust high value commons, then diversity increases transaction costs that all ancestors worked to reduce. So the reason we seek SOME diversity is to increase novelty because we seek to hyper-consume cheap novelty (consumption that destroys commons) rather than expensive novelty (innovation, continued capitalization of commons). I don’t know how to explain this more simply. I would appreciate anyone who could. Leftists spend down inheritance to feed herd instinct for numbers.
-
Reciprocity (full Version)
Apr 1, 2020, 2:16 PM RECIPROCITY (FULL VERSION) The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, in display word and deed, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (in group defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (out groups). “Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” There is no ideal. There are no ideals. There is only what satisfies demand for infallibility. FULL VERSION Limiting our display word and deed to: – Fully informed (truthful and complete); – Regardless of cost to the status, competence, or dominance hierarchy. – Productive and; – Voluntary transfer (or exchange, or imposition of costs upon); – The Demonstrated interests of Others; – Either directly or indirectly (by externality) – Within the limit of incentive for in-group defection; – Within The Limit of the Utility of future out-group Cooperation; – And liable and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability; – Eliminating the incentive of retaliation and retaliation cycles, – And imposition of costs upon the commons of trust by which others cooperate.
-
Reciprocity (full Version)
Apr 1, 2020, 2:16 PM RECIPROCITY (FULL VERSION) The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, in display word and deed, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (in group defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (out groups). “Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” There is no ideal. There are no ideals. There is only what satisfies demand for infallibility. FULL VERSION Limiting our display word and deed to: – Fully informed (truthful and complete); – Regardless of cost to the status, competence, or dominance hierarchy. – Productive and; – Voluntary transfer (or exchange, or imposition of costs upon); – The Demonstrated interests of Others; – Either directly or indirectly (by externality) – Within the limit of incentive for in-group defection; – Within The Limit of the Utility of future out-group Cooperation; – And liable and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability; – Eliminating the incentive of retaliation and retaliation cycles, – And imposition of costs upon the commons of trust by which others cooperate.
-
In Pursuit of A Truthful Religion
May 5, 2020, 1:13 PM We know religions exist and we know why: mindfulness necessary to reduce the stress of the neural economy. We know gods exist – at the very least as information. We also know monotheism is a lie by the evidence – gods change, are invented, and discarded all the time in response to human needs. We know submission is bad by the evidence – it has made us vulnerable to defeat. We know abrahamic theology is bad by the evidence because it teaches the abrahamic method of lying. We know the abrahamic method of lying is bad by the evidence. It’s worse than anything other than the plagues. We are trying to discover how to produce a non-false science of religion that is consistent and coherent across all disciplines. From that science we may reconstruct or construct a foundation for future religion. If you are habituated to your abrahamic monotheism that’s understandable. But it’s just a habituation not a good nor a truth. Man may require mindfulness like he requires rest (he does). But man does not need what you claim he does, which is why we have produced so many different means of obtaining mindfulness. You have been trained to feel you need what you do. But this was done to you and invented so it could be done to you for a reason: to organize the underclasses against the aristocracy (which wasn’t necessarily a bad thing until the underclass and priesthood set out to rule by deceit rather than the truth of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.) Christian behavior (mindfulness insulated from status signaling and status competition) is a good. How do we produce Christian behavior (not belief) without the falsehoods and negative externalities? How do we do it without christian sophistry, pacifism, tolerance, and cowardice? This is not a question of eliminating your faith. It is a question of providing the ‘goods’ of civic religion for those unable to believe the falsehoods you are willing to believe in exchange for your mindfulness. In other words, you don’t matter. You have mindfulness already. You can believe in these things you do. We can’t. We aren’t able to believe falsehoods for ANY reason. We want to prohibit false promises in the new generation that is undermining our civlization like christianity and islam undermined our ancient civlization.. And you only hurt our efforts to stop what has destroyed your religion with your attempts to perpetuation of the falsehoods – you only assist the enemy – and that’s why it is demonstrably winning. The false promise of marxism, feminism, postmodernism in this world is more advantageous a ‘sales strategy’ than the false promise of eternal something or other after death. I will probably spend another decade on this problem. It’s a very hard problem. But I currently see the foundations of that religion, because I see the non-false consistency across physics, biology, evolution, cooperation, sociology, and psychology – to the politics and religion that must result. And is is more like our natural germanic religions : a market and truths – than it is our unnatural semitic religion: a monopoly and lies. In that religion Jesus is a philosopher or prophet of the feminine replacing the female gods of fertility, love, and beauty. And as such that is probably a bad thing. And instead, he should be considered a philosopher or prophet of discipline, by which the underclasses could achieve status by behavior rather than wealth or power. The aristocracy did not have this discipline and did abuse the peasantry, slaves, and women. Jesus gave them a route to respect, and in respect, social equality if not economic and military. He made it possible to demonstrate middle class ethics without middle class resources. And in doing so provided a resistance to the (hedonistic) aristocracy who then, like today, used various forms of excess to demonstrate their social status. And that was his genius. And that is his legacy. And that is the truth not the lie.
-
In Pursuit of A Truthful Religion
May 5, 2020, 1:13 PM We know religions exist and we know why: mindfulness necessary to reduce the stress of the neural economy. We know gods exist – at the very least as information. We also know monotheism is a lie by the evidence – gods change, are invented, and discarded all the time in response to human needs. We know submission is bad by the evidence – it has made us vulnerable to defeat. We know abrahamic theology is bad by the evidence because it teaches the abrahamic method of lying. We know the abrahamic method of lying is bad by the evidence. It’s worse than anything other than the plagues. We are trying to discover how to produce a non-false science of religion that is consistent and coherent across all disciplines. From that science we may reconstruct or construct a foundation for future religion. If you are habituated to your abrahamic monotheism that’s understandable. But it’s just a habituation not a good nor a truth. Man may require mindfulness like he requires rest (he does). But man does not need what you claim he does, which is why we have produced so many different means of obtaining mindfulness. You have been trained to feel you need what you do. But this was done to you and invented so it could be done to you for a reason: to organize the underclasses against the aristocracy (which wasn’t necessarily a bad thing until the underclass and priesthood set out to rule by deceit rather than the truth of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.) Christian behavior (mindfulness insulated from status signaling and status competition) is a good. How do we produce Christian behavior (not belief) without the falsehoods and negative externalities? How do we do it without christian sophistry, pacifism, tolerance, and cowardice? This is not a question of eliminating your faith. It is a question of providing the ‘goods’ of civic religion for those unable to believe the falsehoods you are willing to believe in exchange for your mindfulness. In other words, you don’t matter. You have mindfulness already. You can believe in these things you do. We can’t. We aren’t able to believe falsehoods for ANY reason. We want to prohibit false promises in the new generation that is undermining our civlization like christianity and islam undermined our ancient civlization.. And you only hurt our efforts to stop what has destroyed your religion with your attempts to perpetuation of the falsehoods – you only assist the enemy – and that’s why it is demonstrably winning. The false promise of marxism, feminism, postmodernism in this world is more advantageous a ‘sales strategy’ than the false promise of eternal something or other after death. I will probably spend another decade on this problem. It’s a very hard problem. But I currently see the foundations of that religion, because I see the non-false consistency across physics, biology, evolution, cooperation, sociology, and psychology – to the politics and religion that must result. And is is more like our natural germanic religions : a market and truths – than it is our unnatural semitic religion: a monopoly and lies. In that religion Jesus is a philosopher or prophet of the feminine replacing the female gods of fertility, love, and beauty. And as such that is probably a bad thing. And instead, he should be considered a philosopher or prophet of discipline, by which the underclasses could achieve status by behavior rather than wealth or power. The aristocracy did not have this discipline and did abuse the peasantry, slaves, and women. Jesus gave them a route to respect, and in respect, social equality if not economic and military. He made it possible to demonstrate middle class ethics without middle class resources. And in doing so provided a resistance to the (hedonistic) aristocracy who then, like today, used various forms of excess to demonstrate their social status. And that was his genius. And that is his legacy. And that is the truth not the lie.