no. its in borders. ‘You can do anything you want with p-law you just have to do it truthfully and reciprocally.’ You can crate a socialist paradise in P-Law. The law is just like a programming language. It will fail but it’s possible to construct it legally. 😉
no. its in borders. ‘You can do anything you want with p-law you just have to do it truthfully and reciprocally.’ You can crate a socialist paradise in P-Law. The law is just like a programming language. It will fail but it’s possible to construct it legally. 😉
Hmm.. 1- Soft determinism: the universe operates by deterministic (regular) rules, which is why prediction is possible. 2 – Science for Truth (Decidability) and Philosophy(Preference) for choice. 3 – Penrose is speaking of mathematical measurement b/c high causal density.
Hmm.. 1- Soft determinism: the universe operates by deterministic (regular) rules, which is why prediction is possible. 2 – Science for Truth (Decidability) and Philosophy(Preference) for choice. 3 – Penrose is speaking of mathematical measurement b/c high causal density.
P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.
Acceptance of science is a… https://t.co/j50AimRqS7
P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.
Acceptance of science is a… https://t.co/j50AimRqS7
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83210266_305057504225743_4996380315308482480_o_305057500892410.jpg P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.
Acceptance of science is a test of fitness.
But I won’t pander to anyone.
I can’t.
That’s the whole point.
Truth before face regardless of cost.
And you either advocate for the constitutional reforms that restore our civilization or you don’t.P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.
Acceptance of science is a test of fitness.
But I won’t pander to anyone.
I can’t.
That’s the whole point.
Truth before face regardless of cost.
And you either advocate for the constitutional reforms that restore our civilization or you don’t.
