Theme: Truth

  • There are volumes. Our definition is analytic and empirical and we can find no t

    There are volumes. Our definition is analytic and empirical and we can find no test where it fails decidability, and we explain why, because we explain morality just as analytically. This is the most comprehensive program since Aristotle. (really)

    Reply addressees: @LovelyEWhite1

  • There are volumes. Our definition is analytic and empirical and we can find no t

    There are volumes. Our definition is analytic and empirical and we can find no test where it fails decidability, and we explain why, because we explain morality just as analytically. This is the most comprehensive program since Aristotle. (really)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 22:03:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274100525773004801

    Reply addressees: @LovelyEWhite1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274097300760072195

  • Q: WHAT ARE THE MOST PREVALENT FALSEHOODS?

    Q: WHAT ARE THE MOST PREVALENT FALSEHOODS? https://t.co/sf9CVo3AhS

  • Q: WHAT ARE THE MOST PREVALENT FALSEHOODS?

    Q: WHAT ARE THE MOST PREVALENT FALSEHOODS? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1273958319674273797

  • It’s not possible nor desirable to control people’s thoughts. So it’s not possib

    It’s not possible nor desirable to control people’s thoughts. So it’s not possible or desirable to prevent belief in falsehoods.

    It is possible however to prevent you from selling and distributing these falsehoods with in the physical and informational commons.

    No more lies.

  • It’s not possible nor desirable to control people’s thoughts. So it’s not possib

    It’s not possible nor desirable to control people’s thoughts. So it’s not possible or desirable to prevent belief in falsehoods.

    It is possible however to prevent you from selling and distributing these falsehoods with in the physical and informational commons.

    No more lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 12:11:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273951443972734976

  • PROPERTARIANISM? The Completion of the scientific method; Producing a formal met

    PROPERTARIANISM?

    The Completion of the scientific method; Producing a formal methodology, vocabulary, grammar of both truthful and moral (reciprocal) speech; restating all disciplines in that truthful and reciprocal speech. including producing a law of truthful and reciprocal speech.

    Producing a formal methodology, vocabulary, grammar of both truthful and moral (reciprocal) speech; restating all disciplines in that truthful and reciprocal speech. including producing a law of truthful and reciprocal speech.

    Testimony (Propertarianism) consists of:

    … the use of procedural falsification;

    … in all dimensions of human perception;

    … resulting in the completion of the Scientific Method ;

    … its application to the totality of human knowledge;

    … resulting in a universally commensurable language of all thought;

    … its embodiment in the common law of tort;

    … its use in the construction of a template for constitutions;

    … and as a consequence creating a market for the prosecution of;

    … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit

    … and the eradication of:

    … … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit

    … from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons;

    … reversing the second Semitic attempt at the destruction of Western Civilization as it has destroyed every other by systematic undermining from within;

    … and restoring the quality of life we have expected from Western Civilization;

    … for those that live today, and those that will yet live in the future;”

    But what does that mean?

    It means a body of inviolable law, a constitution built from it, a law that encourages the prosecution of enemies rather than protecting them, and a system of government that restores and preserves that constitution and our way of life, and the uniqueness of Western Civilization for eternity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 07:33:00 UTC

  • (from “ALL: Is there any claim to truth that is incompatible with physical, natu

    (from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkKnOEQlwl4)

    “ALL: Is there any claim to truth that is incompatible with physical, natural, and evolutionary laws? No. There is no Truth problem. There is a competition for the most comforting and useful LIE problem.

    The entirety of the present information problem is the combination of the failure of the Europeans to articulate and defend their group evolutionary strategy against the successful Jewish prewar and postwar revolt against Darwin, and Darwin’s explanation for the success of western civilization, by marxism to undermine tripartism and market natural selection; … neo-marxism to undermine western sense-making, arts, values, and culture that made heroic, the tragedy of physical natural, and evolutionary laws; … postmodernism, as a revolt against the heroic cost of western truth before face regardless of cost, the pursuit of truth under physical, natural, and evolutionary law; … Anti-male feminism, to destroy the Nash compromise between males and females and the nuclear family as both a delay of reproduction, a gate on reproduction, the production of high investment children, who demonstrate the uncommon western high investment in the commons; …. HBD-denial casting Europeans as oppressive proxies for god, rather than those that least deviate from gods laws; … in a competition of the false promise of the industrial revolution’s relief from physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    And your likely inability to tolerate this dense paragraph of painful truth, the tragedy of natural selection, and our heroism in spite of it, is the reason you are still in the market for satisfying lies. -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-17 20:27:00 UTC

  • omg. it’s the truth thing. they couldn’t bear it. that’s the origin

    omg. it’s the truth thing. they couldn’t bear it. that’s the origin.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-17 00:05:00 UTC

  • I leave feelings for women. I just do true. 😉

    I leave feelings for women. I just do true. 😉

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford