RT @RussellJohnston: @curtdoolittle Postmodernism: If I don’t get to decide what the truth is, nobody does.
Modern fake left: If I and my…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-10 17:45:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822328516064448653
RT @RussellJohnston: @curtdoolittle Postmodernism: If I don’t get to decide what the truth is, nobody does.
Modern fake left: If I and my…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-10 17:45:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822328516064448653
Technically speaking science consists of the process of producing testifiable testimony – though explaining that requires a bit of effort. The reason the west developed philosophy and empiricism and science in sequence is almost entirely due to the european political order of individual sovereignty (of at least the warriors), the prohibition on arbitrary authority because of it, the requirement for adversarial debate before ‘juries’ because of that, and the requirement for testimony in those debates.
Reply addressees: @JorySmith05
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 23:58:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822059836361543680
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822058393168679021
RT @ThruTheHayes: DECEIT
In lawful cultures, truth before face, regardless of cost to status or the hierarchy, is paid.
Deception, like a…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 22:58:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821682350457073785
RT @TheMcMullan: A Benefit of Natural Law Theory,
If you’ve ever argued with a leftist you’ll know that they nitpick, conflate, deny and…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-07 00:12:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820976326939160921
You don’t know mine either. Which is why you should have demonstrated good manners and intellectual honesty instead pretentious virtue signaling.
In other words ‘grow up’.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-06 23:30:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820965649314689316
Reply addressees: @PRESJFK1963
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820868301708317073
Reinforcement of NLI’s documentation of types of argument. https://twitter.com/acagamic/status/1820474857878069645
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-06 15:01:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820837646739874178
Thinking… hmmm…. well, possibly. However a ‘truth ai’ would do a great deal to overcome the influence of the industrialization of nonsense and deceit.
if instead you mean, an amplification of the example that kids can’t do math without calculators, and have no consciousness…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-06 04:09:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820673413599441247
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820670481525063788
Joscha, (all);
1. The fact that the people are still advancing human falsehoods and behavioral, social, economic and political impossibilities using the vast array of methods of suggestion, manipulation, deception, fictionalisms, deceit, fraud, denial, projection, accusation, rolling accusation, undermining, reputation destruction and canceling, is due largely to our failure to educate the population into what is not only beneficial but humanly possible by means of incentives in the absence of coercion.
2. The fact that the population are ignorant of the behavioral sciences whether neurological, behavioral, economic, legal, or political is solvable. It’s profoundly more solvable than teaching them mathematics and the sciences that we have been for decades – and with limited success.
3. So, the freedom of truthful reciprocal speech is just another common sense skill that we can easily teach people If and only if we have the political will to do so.
It requires as little as a version of ‘schoolhouse rock’ and as much as a class each year in basic human skills such as hygiene, dress, manners, ethics, morals, basic banking, accounting, contract, and simple project management.
Participatory government is not possible in a polity saturated in false promises of freedom from laws of nature, by lies denying or refuting those laws of nature.
Physical science was easy to instill. It’s impersonal. Behavioral science is much harder – because it denies us many of our cherished falsehoods. And it generates demand for some institution that trains us in mindfulness given that supernatural religion is no longer viable for something approaching eighty percent of the population.
The greeks were right: stoicism is the optimum religion of mindfulness.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @Plinz
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-05 22:34:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820589200925757440
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820368601117085937
Data is data.
Facts are facts.
Evidence is evidence
Causality is causality.
We can explain the superiority of western civilization and european genetics in a single rather lengthy paragraph.
We can measure the results of the superiority of both throughout all of bronze, iron, and steel age history.
Neither the Results, the Civilization, nor the Genetics are an opinion. They are data, facts, evidence, and an explanation of the causality of it all.
Does that mean that others can’t adopt what we invent?
No.
But it might mean that others can’t invent what they adopt.
Because so far they haven’t.
And only east asians appear possible of the same.
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-04 18:43:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820168638604992512
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820166111121281247
RT @ThruTheHayes: IT’S JUST BEYOND BELIEF
faith > belief > trust > confidence > certainty
Faith can be categorized as, short of belief. T…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-03 18:50:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819807974858366990