@Graphic The universe demonstrates, it doesn’t speak, brecause to speak, one can lie. The universe can’t lie. Only men can.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-27 19:33:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105804885812291803
@Graphic The universe demonstrates, it doesn’t speak, brecause to speak, one can lie. The universe can’t lie. Only men can.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-27 19:33:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105804885812291803
Never happen 😉
Deceit
… … sophistry(Philosophy) > pseudoscience(magic) >
… … (Fictionalism) > occult(Theology) >
… Intuition ->/
-> Paradigm[Metaphysics] ->
… Reason ->\
… … (Fiction) > Mythology > Literature >
… … … History > Science > Testimony >
Truth
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-27 17:13:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365711664369311749
Reply addressees: @Anthroposcenics @MindTrained @BernardoKastrup
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365703363099320325
I know whose fault it is. I also know that the only way to change their condition is the truth.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 22:18:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365426147144646660
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @bryanbrey
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365425876385554435
You learn about people when you conflict with them. You do nothing when they opine. There is truth in the fight that is obscured with signal in the peace.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 14:40:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365310843483791361
No. I am very clear when I don’t know something. Or when I am wrong. In this case I am current on knowledge at both ends of the spectrum. So I know what is computable and testifiable – and not.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 02:35:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365128228109713410
Reply addressees: @globoHGplex
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365127586066685954
Not to offend you but don’t you think it’s hubris to claim you can testify to the supernatural when it’s untestifiable, to claim private knowledge in doing so, or to posit a number of questions all of which I know the answer to as if they are somehow difficult? But you’re honest.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 02:05:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365120891110248450
Reply addressees: @globoHGplex
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365119069754646537
(burn)
—“Like I said. It’s an IQ, knowledge, and intellectual honesty thing. That’s three strikes for you. Sorry kid. You’re stuck in little league. 😉 “—
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-25 23:54:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365087856377679876
I don’t really have a ‘need’ for religion, but i think I might like one that wasn’t false. I just want to see if I can save the limited good in xianity (which is in fact a good) while exiting the abrahamic deception.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-25 22:37:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365068545449746432
Reply addressees: @njdigregorio
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365067819289874433
Yes. I posted this quote for bait, because while I see heroism I have come to see (thanks to Daniel) stoicism as the scientific method, but not its ambition. I’m struggling with this because we have it all wrong whether abrahamic, stoic, or epicurean. These are evasions.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-25 20:06:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365030329845747713
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365028273839824905
–“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”– Ellison
You have no right of ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-25 18:14:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365002247831236612