You can’t even comprehend it. If you could make an argument in your own words, you would. Instead, you’re appealing to authority that you do not comprehend. 😉
(Which, honestly, I find comical.)
Cheers 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 17:50:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630626384644014080
Reply addressees: @carsonmcd @JMeanypants @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630625242887405571
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD EXPLAINED SUCCINCTLY
No, given the epistemic necessity of observation, auto association, ideation, hypothesis, theory, surviving theory, where statements can be undecidable, possibly true, or decidably false, science consists of the discipline of producing testifiable testimony (empiricism) within a domain, using physical and logical instrumentation, and their use in data collection (statistical approximation), use of the epistemic sequence, until by verisimilitude (market survival from intellectual competition) we discover the first principles (irreducible laws) of recombination at that stage of constant relations (disciplines), at which point we can produce a formal operational computational (causal) logic of falsification in that domain (specialization).
Survival from falsification requires passing tests of 1) realism, 2) naturalism, 3) identity consistency (unambiguity), 4) internal (logical) consistency, 5) operational (possible) consistency 6) external (observable) consistency, 7) rational choice given knowledge in time, 8) reciprocal rational choice, 9) stated limits and full accounting within those limits (full accounting), 10) and coherence with the first principles of the lower order of constant relations and the upper order of constant relations 11) within the limits of warrantability, liability, and resetitutability.
Now to understand the first principles that are constant at all scales requires understanding ternary logic of the universe, and evolutionary computation of every set of recombinations in the hierarchy of evolutionary complexity that we call the disciplines.
There are roughly twenty laws of ternary logic of evolutionary computation in that hierarchy, covering all the sciences, both logical(formal), physical, behavioral, and evolutionary, that most people can memorize with a bit of effort.
It takes about as much effort to learn this scientific method as any other advanced stem degree, and about as much time, for the simple reason that we must overcome our natural cognitive biases more so than as in mathematics we must learn new ones, and it requires knowledge of multiple disciplines.
It is, in general, unwise to assume I ever assert anything I can’t demonstrate by construction from first principles of the laws of the universe. If I can’t I don’t claim it.
Thank you for the opportunity to demonstrate the meaning of the word ‘science’, and the scientific method.
Hopefully, you’ve learned something.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 17:36:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630623088743268369
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630615554326249498
You haven’t composed an argument. I have any number of students who demonstrate these realities every day. Sorry.
Make an evidence-based argument.
You should be able to google anything I’ve said.
If you can’t, then you’re just lying and denying.
And covering it with ad hom.…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 17:00:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630613915515211776
Reply addressees: @carsonmcd @JMeanypants @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630611591887552513
The educated black community is very aware that if we separate they’re in for some suffering. I just do my job: use the truth to deprive people of lies, frauds, and false alternatives, so that we either restore high investment in behavioral training to compensate for group differences in aggression due to group differences in neotenic evolution, or we will have to separate, because the cost of non-white(103)/asian(106), whether cultural as in religion (middle east:84), or neoteny and aggression (African American:85, Africa:75), is higher than we can bear in great numbers.
One in five members of the African American community are under 75, meaning what is effectively ‘mentally disabled’. And half of the african american community is below 85, which in an industrial civilization, is untrainable, unemployable, and in many cased, non-self-supportable.
Lying about this painful Darwinian reality is what preserves the problem. And the entire leftist movement is nothing more than a post-war revolt against the Darwinian revolution, and an attempt to purge evolution from education and the public.
The church and family succeeded in producing an emerging black upper, middle, and working class, and the church and cultural institutions necessary for training fast-maturing african Americans into participation in high trust western civilization.
The progressives, as usual, destroyed the black family the emergent upper class blacks, and the church that provided the socialization method and community that had nearly integrated blacks into the norms, which is required to integrate them into the economy, and from the economy into the polity.
We can, with effort, devote more attention to discipline and training and mindfulness through rigorous education, that compensates for biological differences. But lying about it, and claiming it’s racism is doing harm, not good.
Run an empirical civilization, not an ideological one.
Simple, well meaning fools, or what we call, ‘busybodies’ are always, and everywhere wrong.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 16:59:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630613563206254606
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630609789490282507
Not an argument. Like I said. I do science.
No more lies.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 15:59:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630598554023542787
Reply addressees: @carsonmcd @JMeanypants @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630596967347765248
Not an argument. A claim (pretense, lie) you have an argument. Almost anything I say can be confirmed with a bit of work in google scholar. Because I hold opinions based on the science.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 15:42:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630594273992163329
Reply addressees: @carsonmcd @JMeanypants @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630592751514402819
Evidence. Thats why. 🙁
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 14:36:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630577636685512709
Reply addressees: @enigma3078
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630534991305232385
I agree. What I want tho is different from what is possible. My goal is to explain group differences truthfully and how to compensate for those differences by working at integration. That said, I would prefer my own people as many would. That can be solved by ending forced association and letting people do as they prefer.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 08:02:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630478473436307456
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630473318586363904
ACCUATION: “You consider yourself an educator?
You’re the worst kind of white suprematist.”
That I’m an educator? It’s just a demonstrable fact. I’m spending time and effort educating you and the audience right now.
That I’m a white supremacist? No, I’m not a white supremacist. I might be a classist (I am) because the problem of race conflict is largely a problem of class conflict, and race differences are largely a difference in the size of the lower and underclasses. So like most people I’m concerned about the behavior of the lower classes. (Genetic load tends to accumulate in the lower classes.)
I might say science is better than all the non-scientific alternatives. I might say ‘whiteness’ is the closest to behavioral science that’s possible by man. I might say ‘whiteness’ as a civilizational model is superior to all others currently known by man. I might be able to say why it is superior to all others known by man. And I might say that it’s very difficult to adopt without the significant effort of full integration.
But as for white people, the data is what it is. Genetically, the east Asians and the Ashkenazi have better statistics than we do. Biologically we are stronger than other races, but East Asians will live longer and Africans can endure more physical stress. So I’m not in favor of white superiority, or white supremacy. I’m in favor of whiteness because the science says ‘whiteness’ as civilizational order is the best man can achieve.
It’s just that whiteness is HARD. Because it requires trust and trustworthiness. And, you know, outside of Japanese, Koreans, and Europeans, that pretty much doesn’t happen in the world. Europeans practice truth before face, duty before self, and defense of the commons before all. It’s very hard to do that. That’s why Europe is a vast open-air museum and the rest of the world isn’t.
Cheers
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 07:04:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630463995734814725
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630456616519888896
No true scottsman fallacy.
Failure to comprehend.
Failure to seek to understand.
Denial and disapproval in the absence of argument.
Attempt at shaming and rallying in absence of argument.
I could go on.
I’m very good at what I do.
You’re the one losing the opportunity to learn.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 06:50:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630460414080303105
Reply addressees: @HealUS_78 @Kadmilus @barnes10_roy @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630456759587418112