Theme: Truth

  • COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE PROBLEM OF EPISTEMOLOGY AT SCALE

    http://feedly.com/k/1tInDdZTHE COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE PROBLEM OF EPISTEMOLOGY AT SCALE

    A profoundly good example of the problem philosophers face in reducing that which we cannot sense and perceive without instruments to analogies to experience which we can.

    As I struggle with the cultural conflation of truth with strategic good, assumed as metaphysical property of reality, and reconciling this with the requirement for ethical testimony, which can only be claimed by observation and measurement, I realize the problems facing those in quantum mechanics and those of ethics and politics of heterogeneous polities, are both products of vast increases in scale and complexity that our minds neither evolved for, nor have our language and epistemological traditions evolved to accommodate.

    We are still mystics at describing reality at scale, not because we are conservative or unwilling, as we were with religion in reaction to science, but because despite our willingness we do not yet know how.

    There are two solutions to this problem: to state scale concepts in perceivable terms as best we can, or to restate all concepts in new terms. Under both models language will eventually evolve, and with it the populace. I suppose the former is more pragmatic but less truthful, and the latter more truthful but less likely to succeed.

    In ethics I face this same problem. And its painful.we must use extant language despite that it is wrong, clarify its meaning by cleansing it of error, and restate relations formed in homogenous polities with the properties of heterogeneous polities.

    Universalism is an error in scale, measurement, and logic.

    Its yeoman’s labor.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-25 01:49:00 UTC

  • DEFINING AND MEASURING THE QUALITY OF ARTS High art contains moral judgments. Th

    DEFINING AND MEASURING THE QUALITY OF ARTS

    High art contains moral judgments. This is one of the reasons Marxists proposed ‘design’ (Rothko for example) replace ‘art’.

    For example, Monet’s Water Lillies are a technological innovation (which we understand today in scientific terms), and is due its place in history for that reason as good art.

    However, his subject matter lacks moral judgments. And therefore lacks the status of high art. Jackson Pollock again, produces design, not art. His design may quality as an innovation, but it is still design, not high art.

    Some of the driving force for design over art was the increase in the size of the population that desired to possess art, which meant that more had to be produced to fill demand, and that the price had to drop. The rest is attributable to the change in content which was a marxist initiative, and remains so. Value judgements are an impediment to universalism and socialism.

    But how can we objectively analyze art?

    LETS LOOK AT HOW TO MEASURE THE QUALITY OF ART.

    1) Craft (narrative, representation)

    2) Design (poetry, aesthetic pleasure)

    3) Innovation (novelty, innovation, )

    And finally:

    4) Content (Mythology, Human experience, ‘truth’, political, judgments)

    Let us set the center to 0, and the limit 255 on each axis.

    Then lets assign R, G, B to Craft, Design, and Innovation, then luminosity to Content.

    If we plot each work of any category of art using relative comparisons (point-testing) on that axis, and connect the four dots, we will be able to generate a sort of ‘surface area’ of the art that can be represented not only in the units covered, but also as an RGB color.

    Now the problem in this analysis is whether the content is ‘true’ (aristocratic) or ‘false’(socialist). There are multiple means of handling this such as using only the RGB/Craft,Design,Innovation axis and making axis 4 vertical “up” for aristocracy, and “down” for content.

    So, now we can create a sort of six sided diamond with white as the maximum socialist(feminist and equalitarian) or aristocratic(familialist and egalitarian) ethics.

    And yes, it is possible to do this pretty easily if you use enough samples of art.

    (I have, I know – as anyone who has used SCRUM will tell you, with enough samples relative indexing becomes very easy and accurate.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 12:24:00 UTC

  • I understand the problem better, but I still cant do better that ultimate truth(

    I understand the problem better, but I still cant do better that ultimate truth(perfect parsimony), current knowledge of truth(imperfect parsimony), and truthful testimony.

    I have to go back to the propertarian argument and warranty.

    That eliminates the problem of correcting the now conventional use of terms.

    Not sure why I didnt firure it out earlier, but its not necessary to correct it. Its only necessary to require warranty.

    Thanks for all the CR people who helped me yet again.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 11:34:00 UTC

  • not about the pursuit of truth? — one third of the participants admit to havin

    http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/07/23/scientific-misbehavior-in-economics/Its not about the pursuit of truth?

    — one third of the participants admit to having cherry-picked results —


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 11:21:00 UTC

  • (Freaking too many people out. Maybe I should go offline while I work on the var

    (Freaking too many people out. Maybe I should go offline while I work on the various forms of truth as group evolutionary strategies. I mean, it’s so freaking obvious. But we think (erroneously) that we have a lock on it. And we’re wrong. We have a lock on platonic truth. We don’t have a lock on any form of extant truth. sigh.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 08:36:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT UTOPIANISM: IT’S MERELY DECEPTION, FRAUD, LYING The war of the liars ag

    IT’S NOT UTOPIANISM: IT’S MERELY DECEPTION, FRAUD, LYING

    The war of the liars against the people who tell the truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 04:21:00 UTC

  • A PROHIBITION ON TRUTH They are prohibiting truth. They made our ignorance somet

    A PROHIBITION ON TRUTH

    They are prohibiting truth.

    They made our ignorance something to celebrate.

    They made our passions something to surrender to.

    They made freedom of speech and virtue of opinion morally superior to speaking the truth and only the truth.

    They buried us in pseudoscience

    They have manufactured a moral prohibition on truth, and a mandatory license for lies.

    They say ‘what harm are these little lies?’.

    They declared war on the people who speak the truth. When our only cultural advantage is that we speak the truth.

    Is truth teh domain of warriors, and all else deception?

    The, truth, property, insurance, militia : aristocracy

    Devious


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 04:19:00 UTC

  • SNIPPETS OF OATHS (truth, property, insurance : aristocracy) Speak the truth, ev

    SNIPPETS OF OATHS

    (truth, property, insurance : aristocracy)

    Speak the truth, even if it leads to your death.

    Take not that wasn’t justly paid for.

    Safeguard the helpless.

    Punish the wicked.

    Virtue knows no convenience and apology,

    Only duty, and celebration or mourning.

    Nobility is a choice.

    Choose.

    .


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 03:23:00 UTC

  • WHY IS IT IRONIC? WE: “The People Who Tell The Truth” THEY: “The People Who Taug

    WHY IS IT IRONIC?

    WE: “The People Who Tell The Truth”

    THEY: “The People Who Taught Us To Lie”

    (Using very elaborate techniques I might add.)

    We are a trusting and naive people.

    The worlds best warriors are the most trusting and naive people.

    Why is that ironic somehow?

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 02:37:00 UTC

  • DEAR MICROSOFT : SELLING TRUTH I have never been able to get you to take my advi

    DEAR MICROSOFT : SELLING TRUTH

    I have never been able to get you to take my advice. Nor have most of the major advertising agencies succeeded in getting you to take their advice. We all fail because you think you are smarter than we are. Thats why we all agreed a long time ago to give you what you want until you fail, and become desperate enough to listen to us.

    Good advertising is the truth, spoken succinctly and elegantly. There are many other kinds of advertising, on which to ride your brand, but while beer can sell with something as simple as sex, and snacks with farcical humor, the more complex, expensive and serious the product or service, the more important is selling the ‘truth’.

    The truth is that Microsoft products help you get your work done. And if you want to make a living, then you need to know how to use them. Everyone else is selling cheap entertainment. You can’t play in the entertainment space unless you sell hardware, and even if you sell hardware, to take advantage of your brand, you must market to serious people doing serious things.

    There is margin in business products that can NEVER exist in consumer products. So stop trying to be fashionable for consumers, and be excellent for people who want to have a job, get work done at their job, associate with people who have jobs and get work done. And enjoy life with people who have jobs and get work done.

    The way to succeed is to tell this truth and trivialize all other products on the market. The global recession continues and will continue since the world economy has rebalanced its labor pools and today we live in that ‘normal’ state which we will live in for a very long time to come.

    As such, Microsoft products are for people who REALLY want a better life, and everyone else’s products are for people who want to pretend they have a better life – for a few moments at least.

    You would fare much better with TV ads showing EMPLOYED young people and unemployed people using non-microsoft products. Because honestly, that’s the truth.

    So please stop making a fool of yourself. You succeeded. You’re now IBM. So sell to grownups on the one hand. Sell to gamers on the other. Because those two audiences you can speak the truth to.

    Truth works, always and everywhere.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 01:41:00 UTC