I understand the problem better, but I still cant do better that ultimate truth(

I understand the problem better, but I still cant do better that ultimate truth(perfect parsimony), current knowledge of truth(imperfect parsimony), and truthful testimony.

I have to go back to the propertarian argument and warranty.

That eliminates the problem of correcting the now conventional use of terms.

Not sure why I didnt firure it out earlier, but its not necessary to correct it. Its only necessary to require warranty.

Thanks for all the CR people who helped me yet again.