Theme: Truth

  • WHAT CONSTITUTES A TRUTHFUL RELIGION (important) I have a soul. I can observe it

    WHAT CONSTITUTES A TRUTHFUL RELIGION

    (important)

    I have a soul. I can observe it through introspection. It is a full accounting of my sins, offset by a selective accounting of my acts of charity. I know the balance of that account. We all know the balance of that account – even if we fear to look at it. The chief value of an all-knowing god, is as a psychological device that assists us in looking at the transactions in, and balance of, that account, without any ability to lie to ourselves. The chief value of confession is to publicly admit this balance, and use peer pressure to eliminate any deficit.

    Whether that soul is eternal is not a question – of course it is. We can commit no sin or perform no charity without the existence of others to sin or perform charity against. Our actions leave a permanent record in the universe. We live on eternally in the changes to the universe that we have made by our actions. That is what acting means: to alter the course of events. Each action does so. That our simple human minds need to anthropomorphize these ideas so that they are easier for the ignorant, dim, and fearful to grasp is no more surprising than that children need parables, myths, legends, and fairy tales to grasp basic concepts using models for concepts otherwise beyond their experience.

    This scientific view of one’s sould is not without what humans consider supernatural properties however. It is increasingly clear that we do not understand the structure of matter, space, and time, and that our perception of matter, space, and time, is limited to that in which we can act. If even some small part of our understanding of the universe is true, then it is entirely possible that it matters not only how we act, but how we think, and what we believe, and how others remember us.

    Given that the worst case argument we can construct about supernatural forces is to say “I do not know, but it places no cost upon me either way,” or that “I choose to act as if it is so because there is no penalty for doing so, but a benefit for doing so”, “and there are benefits to psychological rituals for all mankind”, we have enough justification for the conceptual use of one or more all knowing gods that assists our minds in confronting a full accounting of our actions, and the presumption of the possibility that collective ritual may in fact alter the structure of not only our minds in beneficial ways, but the minds of others, and potentially the structure of the universe in beneficial ways.

    Moreover, since it is increasingly clear that we are not cognizant of the power of our genes, our intuitions and our biases upon our minds and actions, it is not clear that there is an as yet unrecognized equivalent of a calculating system of some sort – ostensibly unaware – produced by the actions, thoughts and memories of all of us. I have no way of knowing one way or the other. But without knowing I will not fail to pay the cost of perpetuating what has worked for all of human history: rituals that bind us to one another through invocation of the submission-to-the-pack response ever present in our brain stems.

    Our understanding is overrated, because it is extremely limited. So in these cases I prefer to do what is beneficial for men and man, assuming that the recipe we follow for collective religious ritual is causing us to produce some product that I do not understand, rather than to write it off as a psychological crutch or weakness. It’s just science. How we justify this particular thing as purely scientific and useful, rational, psychological or mystical is not important to me. These are just languages for different levels of abstraction, all of which describe the same process and its effects.

    As such I merely prefer the least false set of beliefs, and the most constructive forms of ritual. And those are, from my knowledge: the practice of sport, the discipline of stoic mindfulness, the sacredness of nature, the ceremonial request for wisdom from, and the ceremonial thanks to our heroes, the gathering of souls in the practice of all of the above, and our surrender to the pack as a means of overcoming our petty differences and interests.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-12 09:06:00 UTC

  • IF YOU DON’T LIKE WHAT I SAY – THINK ABOUT THIS I work on the discipline (techno

    IF YOU DON’T LIKE WHAT I SAY – THINK ABOUT THIS

    I work on the discipline (technology) of speaking truthfully. Not honestly, but truthfully – as in “as scientifically as possible”.

    Now like any human being I absolutely do engage in various forms of sarcasm, humor, honorarium, and illustration. But in general, I try to write ‘proofs’: including tests of internal consistency, external correspondence, informational availability, existential possibility, limits, parsimony, and full accounting. That’s the innovation that Propertarianism and Testimonialism provide us with: an amoral (unloaded) language for the articulation and comparison of various political, ethical and moral statements.

    Now, I don’t (like everyone else in the world, and in intellectual history) want to know the truth so that I can justify the use of my particular moral bias over your particular moral bias. Instead, I want to know the truth so that you and I can conduct an exchange – a compromise – rather than a conquest. A trade rather than a monopoly act of oppression. A ‘truth’ rather than a falsehood.

    And that is how Propertarianism differs from the fallacies of authoritarian monotheism, utilitarian rationalism, and democratic majority rule: that the only ‘truth’ we can know is when your bias and my bias results in a compromise that is mutually beneficial.

    Now that does not mean that we need to agree – another fallacy of democracy – but it means we cannot materially dissent. In other words, we can trade in a compromise, or we can prevent each other from imposing costs upon one another’s property-en-toto (what you’ve acted to obtain), but we cannot by any method impose costs on one another’s property-en-toto.

    So if you don’t like something that’s true, or you want to speak an untruth, then you’re just a bad dishonest person unworthy of cooperation. If you want to preserve monopoly democracy, then you’re just a bad and dishonest thief unworthy of cooperation and worthy of punishment, ostracization and death. If you want to just get away with stealing from others without engaging in trade then you’re again, a bad, dishonest, thief worthy of punishment, ostracization and death.

    But if you want to do something that does not impose a cost upon me or mine, I will not and cannot interfere with you. And if you want to impose a cost upon me, or gain my cooperation then I will enter in an exchange with you.

    But what I will not do, and what no future generations will willingly do, is allow you to perpetuate the pseudoscience, propaganda, deception, and outright lying that has been the basis of the socialist, progressive, feminist, libertine, and neo-conservative movements of the 19th and 20th centuries.

    If that is the case then I am morally justified, ethically justified, and biologically mandated to exterminate you.

    So if you disagree with this I must end you, and all like you. Not for me, but for all of mankind.

    This is the most and best moral position any man can take.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-12 06:31:00 UTC

  • Almost all of philosophy after Aristotle up until Hume consists of a few feather

    Almost all of philosophy after Aristotle up until Hume consists of a few feathers of wisdom and a vast amount of hand waving. Justification, wishful thinking and cunning lies.

    The the evolution of law is the only meaningful source of insight into western man’s mind. the evolution of art, the evolution of war, the evolution of money, banking, credit, interest and insurance; the evolution of mathematics. Of engineering. Of astronomy. Of our diets. Our dress. All add color.

    But philosophy consists of convenient lies by the church, polite begging of the middle class. Wishful thinking of the proletarians. And nonsensical pseudo mysticism of the academy.

    Liars all. Dreamers all.

    We soldier onward.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-11 19:31:00 UTC

  • “Myths and Traditions provide information, not argument. It’s often good informa

    —“Myths and Traditions provide information, not argument. It’s often good information. But that does not mean it provides us with an argument.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-11 13:54:00 UTC

  • Free Speech or Truthful Speech? Academic Freedom or Academic unaccountability? W

    Free Speech or Truthful Speech? Academic Freedom or Academic unaccountability? Welders must warranty, not philosophers. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-11 08:23:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664357769793900544

    Reply addressees: @Robert_Graboyes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664309701010718720


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Robert_Graboyes

    Which group more strongly supports free speech and academic freedom?
    – Philosophers
    – Welders

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664309701010718720

  • Propertarianism and Testimonialism complete science and unify science, law, mora

    Propertarianism and Testimonialism complete science and unify science, law, morality and philosophy.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-10 18:23:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664146347285733376

    Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664111308300652544


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664111308300652544

  • I advocate truthfulness. I just read the first two pages, but the author is maki

    I advocate truthfulness. I just read the first two pages, but the author is making a statement about mathematics and logic.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-10 18:22:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664146067752099840

    Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664111308300652544


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/664111308300652544

  • There are those who are could care less, those who are curious and those who thi

    There are those who are could care less, those who are curious and those who thirst for it. The latter matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-09 11:27:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663679236578918401

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663601766831788032


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    @ne0colonial @curtdoolittle … not that it’s uninteresting.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663601766831788032

  • We can purge all forms of lies from this earth. And in doing so, transform man i

    —We can purge all forms of lies from this earth. And in doing so, transform man into gods. For what is a god but a wielder of truth? And what is a devil, but a wielder of error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit?—

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-09 06:05:00 UTC

  • Anyway. I’m an advocate for my people because of our high trust, truth telling,

    Anyway. I’m an advocate for my people because of our high trust, truth telling, aristotelian civilization as well kinship.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-08 22:13:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663479374998593536

    Reply addressees: @WhittierPal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663478002215317504


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/663478002215317504