Theme: Truth

  • THE MIDDLE CLASS NEGOTIATES. ARISTOCRACY PROSECUTES. WOMEN, PRIESTS, AND STATE A

    THE MIDDLE CLASS NEGOTIATES. ARISTOCRACY PROSECUTES. WOMEN, PRIESTS, AND STATE APOLOGIZE.

    I prosecute falsehoods. I’m agnostic in prosecuting falsehoods. I prosecute libertarian and conservative falsehoods as hard or harder than I prosecute progressive falsehoods. Why? Because libertarian and conservative literature, philosophy, and rhetoric has been a demonstrated failure in competition against socialist, feminist, and postmodern matriarchal literature, philosophy, and arguments. Why? Because women vote more consistently against THE GREAT GENDER COMPROMISES, of the west, and because women are the dominant consumers, and because women are the most pliable customers of the profiteers in the academy media, and state.

    No matriarchal civilizations survive. Why? It’s suicidal. We give women and those who profit from their impulses uncommon liberty, yet not adequate restraints. We prosecute profiting from the sale of all other forms of harm. Why don’t we prosecute those who profit from this kind of harm: genocide.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 01:42:00 UTC

  • You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would tr

    You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would try to learn from literature the way we learn from myths and parables. Just because you derive wisdom from something doesn’t mean it’s a test of truth or necessity.

    WTF is wrong with these people. They’re freaking crazy. The fact that they’re spouting crazy literature as if it’s science conveys upon them some sort of protection? Why? I don’t listen to schizophrenics. I don’t listen to german rationalists for that matter.

    I consider myself a religious and spiritual person, even if my concepts of these things are somewhat esoteric – scientific even – to the point where its arguable we are talking about the same things. I am skeptical of people who lack such things because there is too high an incidence of sociopathy among them.

    But people who argue using religious literature are no different from people arguing by referring to Dr Seuss. It’s ridiculous.

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 15:30:00 UTC

  • Дуже задоволений сервісом УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ: Я пишу серйозну філософію. Я виступаю за

    Дуже задоволений сервісом УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ:

    Я пишу серйозну філософію. Я виступаю за свободу і процвітання: правдивий, Хороший і гарний. Це те, що я роблю. Я відповідаю на дуже важкі питання. Я добре відповідати на дуже важкі питання. Якщо я можу допомогти Україні оговтатися від радянської епохи корупції і приєднатися до наших кузенів в Польщі в сучасному процвітанні, то я зроблю це.

    АЛЕ …. БУДЬ ЛАСКА НЕ:

    1) Спробуйте продати мені що-небудь.

    У мене є все, що я хочу або потреба. Я буду просто блокувати вас.

    2) просити гроші.

    Я не дам тобі грошей – ніколи. Я буду просто блокувати вас.

    3) Розкажіть про вашу бізнес-ідеї.

    Я гарантую, ваша бізнес-ідея смішно, якщо не по-дурному, але ви просто не знаєте, що це смішно ще. Чому? Тому що люди з грошима купують цінність – хитрість, і майже всі в Україні все ще намагається бути хитрим, або продати щось дешеве, але вони не створюють цінності. І саме тому ми бідні тут, в Україні. Ви можете обдурити і обдурити і використовувати в своїх інтересах людей з хитрістю. Ви повинні торгувати людьми чесно по вартості. Ви створюєте цінність, маючи спеціальні знання в якійсь мистецтва, науки і техніки. Таким чином, ви витрачаєте свій час. Я буду просто блокувати вас негайно.

    4) Спробуйте спокусити мене (жінки).

    Я люблю компанію жінок. Я люблю говорити з новими людьми. Але я джентльмен. Ми не “побешкетувати”. Я не вільний.

    Хоча ні, я не буду блокувати вас. Це дуже добре для мого старіння его.

    Curt Дулітл 😉

    ————————

    DEAR NEW UKRAINIAN FRIENDS:

    I write serious philosophy. I advocate liberty and prosperity: The Truthful, The Good and The Beautiful. That is what I do. I answer very difficult questions. I am good at answering very difficult questions. If I can help Ukraine recover from soviet era corruption and join our cousins in Poland in modern prosperity, then I will do that.

    BUT…. PLEASE DO NOT:

    1) Try to sell me something.

    I have everything I want or need. I will just block you.

    2) Ask for money.

    I won’t give you any money – ever. I will just block you.

    3) Tell me about your business idea.

    I guarantee your business idea is ridiculous if not stupid, but you just don’t know it’s ridiculous yet. Why? Because people with money buy value – not cunning, and nearly everyone in Ukraine is still trying to be cunning, or to sell something cheap, but they are not creating value. And that is why we are poor here in Ukraine. You can fool and cheat and take advantage of people with cunning. You must trade people honestly for value. You create value by having specialized knowledge of some art, science or technology. So, You are wasting my time. I will just block you immediately.

    4) Try to seduce me (ladies).

    I love the company of women. I love talking to new people. But I’m a gentleman. We don’t ‘fool around’. I am not free.

    Although no, I won’t block you. It’s too good for my aging ego.

    Curt Doolittle 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 07:51:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? It’s a language for the value neutral analysis of socia

    WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?

    It’s a language for the value neutral analysis of social activity.

    I never know which way to say it:

    1) Testimonialism’s Propertarian Ethics

    2) Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth.

    3) Natural Law’s Market Government.

    These things are all about the same. Roman convinced me to stick with Propertarianism becuase I’d invested in the brand name. But in practice “Propertarianism” consists of

    1) Testimonial Truth,

    2) Propertarian Ethics

    3) Market Government

    4) Natural Law as a Group Evolutionary Strategy


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 05:16:00 UTC

  • IS TRUTH? (Introduction to Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/WHAT IS TRUTH?

    (Introduction to Propertarianism’s Testimonial Truth)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 05:12:00 UTC

  • WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE #NewRight Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law (vision but

    WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE

    #NewRight

    Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law

    (vision but failure)

    Augustine and The Church.

    (incremental improvement – but failure)

    Hobbes, Locke, Smith and Hume

    (incremental improvement but bordering on science)

    Menger (Austrian/Galacian Science – German Rational tradition) 1840

    Mises (Jewish/Galacian pseudoscience – jewish legal tradition) 1881

    Hayek (German/Anglo Empirical – Adopted Anglo legal tradition) 1899

    (failure again, with only hayek discovering that it is law not economics that produces social science)

    Rothbard (Jewish/Russian Justification -Jewish legal tradition)1926

    Hoppe (German Rational – Continental legal tradition), 1949

    Doolittle (Anglo Empirical – Anglo Saxon legal tradition). 1959

    (success)

    Rothbard, Doolittle, and Hoppe. We solved social science in three generations.

    The only social science possible is the common law: the discovery of means of violating the requirement for productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, limited to positive externalities of the same. Economics is the study of information and incentives to cooperate.

    The basis of natural law is disproportionate value of cooperation.

    The language of natural law is economic, not moral.

    It was the failure of prior generations to rely upon financial and economic language rather than religious and moral language that prevented the solution to the problem of the social sciences. Morality is economic. It must be. Since we are part of the physical universe.

    This is where Hayek ended up. He was right. But even he could not escape his language. And even he did not know how to solve the problem of truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 04:05:00 UTC

  • I am trying but I cannot translate this into anything meaningful. 🙁

    I am trying but I cannot translate this into anything meaningful. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 13:13:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714077804086829056

    Reply addressees: @DIA_operative

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714032791676059648


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DIA_operative

    @curtdoolittle What is it that punishment actually proves? How is it normative of trust to punish?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714032791676059648

  • Anyone relying upon principles rather than full sentences is trying to lie, chea

    Anyone relying upon principles rather than full sentences is trying to lie, cheat, and steal. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 09:24:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714020253454503936

    Reply addressees: @BobDude15

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714020012181204996


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714020012181204996

  • In religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation, intentions are merely jus

    In religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation, intentions are merely justifications or deceits. It does not matter what one said, what a scripture says, what a law says, or what an investor pays for.

    All that matters is the outcome.

    If practice of your religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation lead to sustainable intergenerational prosperity then it is true. otherwise it is false. There is no other test of religion, philosophy, legislation and speculation.

    This is very hard for humans to accept.

    But it is science.

    We do not describe imaginations.

    We describe reality.

    Because all else is error deceit and fraud.

    NO MORE LIES


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:36:00 UTC

  • FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO. The subject of my writing is an analytic

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO.

    The subject of my writing is an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism, a tool for creating a value-free language for communicating conceptual, behavioral, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies. In other words, Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    Propertarianism is a way to say things which are true, but that many do not wish to be true. Every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science) embodying errors, lies and deceptions that I want to correct.

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’ — choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITARIAN democracy. But in favor of democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    MARKET GOVERNMENT NEEDS TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    DEMONSTRATION OF THESE IDEAS

    All of my arguments demonstrate the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    A world where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    WE NEED TO CRITICIZE OURSELVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle

    (edited by D Frank Robinson )

    ————————————-original prior to edits————–

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS

    I write write in an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism. The purpose of this language is to create a value-free (neutral) tool for communicating conceptual, behavioral, ethical, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies.

    In other words Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    When write here I very often say things that are true, but that we do not wish to be true. The reason is that I want to correct the errors, lies, and deceptions of the enlightenments – all of them, in every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science).

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’. But choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITY democracy. But in favor of Democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    BUT FOR MARKET GOVERNMENT WE NEED TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    WHEN YOU READ OR HEAR MY CRITICISMS – IT”S ALWAYS TO DEMONSTRATE THESE IDEAS.

    All of my arguments are somehow connected with the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    SO IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    One where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    I PREFER TO CRITICiZE OURSEVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:20:00 UTC