Theme: Truth

  • You Dont Have The Right To Spread Ignorance

    YOU DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPREAD IGNORANCE ( Nick Heywood and Curt Doolittle ) Why do you have the right to ignorance? Well, there is a difference between enjoying the luxury of ignorance at other’s expense, and distributing ignorance by your words and deeds. And there is a difference between general knowledge that allows us to escape our ignorance, and the means of testing information against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, overloading, pseudoscience and deceit, that allows us to increase our knowledge and decrease our ignorance, and to speak truthfully and avoid speaking untruthfully. And since the animal man evolved to negotiate and deceive as well as describe and inform, and since we evolved to act rationally – meaning morally when in our interests and immorally when in our interests – the reason it has taken us thousands of years to develop the technology of truth telling that we call ‘science’, is because it is unnatural to us. We evolved to negotiate, not testify. So just as we must learn manners, ethics, morals, and laws to obtain access to and participate in the benefits of that market for cooperation that we call the ‘social order’, we must learn the ethics of knowledge: how to eliminate error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, loading and framing, overloading, pseudoscience, and deceit. And we must teach one another manners, ethics, morals, laws – not only defensively: to limit the ill-mannered, unethical, immoral, and illegal – but also as investment: to increase the number of people with whom we have an option to cooperate at ever lower costs, in the production of private and common goods, services, and information, for mutual benefit. So defensive and investment reasons we must invest constantly in the teaching of manners, ethics, morals, and laws, including the ethical science of interpreting and giving testimony: truth telling. And conversely we must punish those who cause harm to manners, ethics morals and law; cause harm to the production of private and common goods, services, and information. But how do we punish? By the incremental suppression of ill-mannered, unethical, immoral, illegal, speech: DEPRIVATION OF OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK 1st with ridicule & shame (Ya f’n idiot! What are ya thinkin’? Or ya not thinkin’?!?) DEPRIVATION OF OPPORTUNITY TO COOPERATE: 2nd with ostracism (I’m afraid I can’t associate with you. You’re deceitful and just repeat lies you’ve been convinced of as true in order to influence) DEPRIVATION OF GOODS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION 3rd loss of privilege (I can’t trade with you or offer service, ya on ya own!) DEPRIVATION OF CHOICE 4th loss of liberty (You’re a danger. You lose the ability to make your own decisions. You demonstrate a high risk to other’s welfare) DEPRIVATION OF ACTION 5th loss of freedom! (Off to Jail ya go ya f’er! Or war in the case of the state

    😉

  • You Dont Have The Right To Spread Ignorance

    YOU DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPREAD IGNORANCE ( Nick Heywood and Curt Doolittle ) Why do you have the right to ignorance? Well, there is a difference between enjoying the luxury of ignorance at other’s expense, and distributing ignorance by your words and deeds. And there is a difference between general knowledge that allows us to escape our ignorance, and the means of testing information against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, overloading, pseudoscience and deceit, that allows us to increase our knowledge and decrease our ignorance, and to speak truthfully and avoid speaking untruthfully. And since the animal man evolved to negotiate and deceive as well as describe and inform, and since we evolved to act rationally – meaning morally when in our interests and immorally when in our interests – the reason it has taken us thousands of years to develop the technology of truth telling that we call ‘science’, is because it is unnatural to us. We evolved to negotiate, not testify. So just as we must learn manners, ethics, morals, and laws to obtain access to and participate in the benefits of that market for cooperation that we call the ‘social order’, we must learn the ethics of knowledge: how to eliminate error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, loading and framing, overloading, pseudoscience, and deceit. And we must teach one another manners, ethics, morals, laws – not only defensively: to limit the ill-mannered, unethical, immoral, and illegal – but also as investment: to increase the number of people with whom we have an option to cooperate at ever lower costs, in the production of private and common goods, services, and information, for mutual benefit. So defensive and investment reasons we must invest constantly in the teaching of manners, ethics, morals, and laws, including the ethical science of interpreting and giving testimony: truth telling. And conversely we must punish those who cause harm to manners, ethics morals and law; cause harm to the production of private and common goods, services, and information. But how do we punish? By the incremental suppression of ill-mannered, unethical, immoral, illegal, speech: DEPRIVATION OF OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK 1st with ridicule & shame (Ya f’n idiot! What are ya thinkin’? Or ya not thinkin’?!?) DEPRIVATION OF OPPORTUNITY TO COOPERATE: 2nd with ostracism (I’m afraid I can’t associate with you. You’re deceitful and just repeat lies you’ve been convinced of as true in order to influence) DEPRIVATION OF GOODS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION 3rd loss of privilege (I can’t trade with you or offer service, ya on ya own!) DEPRIVATION OF CHOICE 4th loss of liberty (You’re a danger. You lose the ability to make your own decisions. You demonstrate a high risk to other’s welfare) DEPRIVATION OF ACTION 5th loss of freedom! (Off to Jail ya go ya f’er! Or war in the case of the state

    😉

  • Which Argument Are You Making?

    Some arguments ask if statements are ‘possible’ or ‘impossible’. Some arguments ask if statements are ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Some arguments ask if statements are true or false. Some arguments ask if statements are gains or losses. Some arguments ask if statements are exchanges or transfers Some arguments ask if statements are investments or frauds Some arguments ask if statements are any of the above.

  • Which Argument Are You Making?

    Some arguments ask if statements are ‘possible’ or ‘impossible’. Some arguments ask if statements are ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Some arguments ask if statements are true or false. Some arguments ask if statements are gains or losses. Some arguments ask if statements are exchanges or transfers Some arguments ask if statements are investments or frauds Some arguments ask if statements are any of the above.

  • Contradiction Isn’t A Problem For Free Riders

    Curt Doolittle Nov 18, 2016 9:28am Contradiction is not a problem for women or liberals. Because correspondence with reality is not necessary for women or liberals. Because truth is not necessary for women or liberals. Because the purpose of liberal verbalism is to lie, cheat, and steal. Because they are seeking to avoid trades, and impose rents. The Left is a Kleptocracy, and the Right a Meritocracy. There is nothing more to be said. Liberals and Women just ‘want’. We’re the ones who limit their wants to what is not harmful. Otherwise there is no end to their wants.

  • Contradiction Isn’t A Problem For Free Riders

    Curt Doolittle Nov 18, 2016 9:28am Contradiction is not a problem for women or liberals. Because correspondence with reality is not necessary for women or liberals. Because truth is not necessary for women or liberals. Because the purpose of liberal verbalism is to lie, cheat, and steal. Because they are seeking to avoid trades, and impose rents. The Left is a Kleptocracy, and the Right a Meritocracy. There is nothing more to be said. Liberals and Women just ‘want’. We’re the ones who limit their wants to what is not harmful. Otherwise there is no end to their wants.

  • How do we know that? If all russians lie, and if all russian media is false, how

    How do we know that? If all russians lie, and if all russian media is false, how can anything be true?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 14:57:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802526679004512256

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802526046243299328


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802526046243299328

  • “Everything A Russian Says Is A Lie.” Russians cannot tell the difference betwee

    “Everything A Russian Says Is A Lie.” Russians cannot tell the difference between reality and fantasy.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 14:23:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802518207433150466

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802517656821760001


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802517656821760001

  • NONE OF US IS EQUAL (second draft) We are unequal. We grant each other the prete

    NONE OF US IS EQUAL

    (second draft)

    We are unequal. We grant each other the pretense of equality in order to discover the truth, through discourse and debate, that is free of error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit. We grant each other equality under the law to assist one another in cooperating productively and without conflict and retaliation across our various stations and abilities. We grant each other equal access to the market, by the equality of money and prices, because we all buy entry into the market by forgoing opportunities for violence, theft, and fraud, despite our differences in wealth. It is through these three equalities of opportunity that we cooperate despite our inequalities of interest, ability, value to one another, and wealth. But we are in no way equal.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 14:23:00 UTC

  • TRUTH: Every Russian attack in the Donbas buys Ukraine 6 months of sanctions aga

    TRUTH: Every Russian attack in the Donbas buys Ukraine 6 months of sanctions against Russia.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 14:21:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802517692091465729

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802510326226948096


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802510326226948096