Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary.
Theme: Truth
-
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary. -
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:23:00 UTC
-
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) i
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) it is overloading (via negativa grammar). All the supposed ‘logics’ consist of nothing more than domain and range of some dimension of perception, wherein logic (constant relations) is unavoidable. Logic consists of the attempt to preserve constant relations, and ‘proof’ tells us nothing other than within that set of dimensions constant relations ahve been preserved. However, by limiting the semantic content to human opertions we preserve constant relations. Overloading Serves Feminine (Left) Need for Consensus (False consensus bias). -
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) i
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) it is overloading (via negativa grammar). All the supposed ‘logics’ consist of nothing more than domain and range of some dimension of perception, wherein logic (constant relations) is unavoidable. Logic consists of the attempt to preserve constant relations, and ‘proof’ tells us nothing other than within that set of dimensions constant relations ahve been preserved. However, by limiting the semantic content to human opertions we preserve constant relations. Overloading Serves Feminine (Left) Need for Consensus (False consensus bias). -
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) i
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) it is overloading (via negativa grammar).
All the supposed ‘logics’ consist of nothing more than domain and range of some dimension of perception, wherein logic (constant relations) is unavoidable.
Logic consists of the attempt to preserve constant relations, and ‘proof’ tells us nothing other than within that set of dimensions constant relations ahve been preserved.
However, by limiting the semantic content to human opertions we preserve constant relations.
Overloading Serves Feminine (Left) Need for Consensus (False consensus bias).
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 08:28:00 UTC
-
“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand
—“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand everything too soon.”— Pope -
“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand
—“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand everything too soon.”— Pope
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 12:55:00 UTC
-
I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive
I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine. -
I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive
I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 11:48:00 UTC