The 10 least tax-friendly states: 1. Illinois (Force chicago into a city state) 2. Connecticut (it’s dead. the state is dead) 3. New York (end the fed, end NYC forever) 4. Wisconsin (because swedes are socialists) 5. New Jersey (because it’s an dump?) 6. Nebraska (because real estate taxes can’t do it ) 7. Pennsylvania (because of philadelphia and rust belt) 8. Ohio (How did they screw up that state? How?) 9. Iowa (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) 10. Kansas (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) The 10 most tax-friendly states: 1. Wyoming – No income tax 2. Nevada – No income tax 3. Tennessee – only income tax on interest and dividends. 4. Florida – wealth magnet. Poor magnet. 5. Alaska – no demand. 6. Washington – legacy. reasons 7. South Dakota – no population to service 8. North Dakota – no population to service 9. Arizona – american switzerland (gambling) 10. New Hampshire – only decent people live here and no redistribution so no low parasites. southern european and catholic immigration storm didn’t hit here.
Theme: Subsidy
-
The 10 Least and 10 Most tax-friendly states:
The 10 least tax-friendly states: 1. Illinois (Force chicago into a city state) 2. Connecticut (it’s dead. the state is dead) 3. New York (end the fed, end NYC forever) 4. Wisconsin (because swedes are socialists) 5. New Jersey (because it’s an dump?) 6. Nebraska (because real estate taxes can’t do it ) 7. Pennsylvania (because of philadelphia and rust belt) 8. Ohio (How did they screw up that state? How?) 9. Iowa (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) 10. Kansas (again, no other tax vehicle because of farming) The 10 most tax-friendly states: 1. Wyoming – No income tax 2. Nevada – No income tax 3. Tennessee – only income tax on interest and dividends. 4. Florida – wealth magnet. Poor magnet. 5. Alaska – no demand. 6. Washington – legacy. reasons 7. South Dakota – no population to service 8. North Dakota – no population to service 9. Arizona – american switzerland (gambling) 10. New Hampshire – only decent people live here and no redistribution so no low parasites. southern european and catholic immigration storm didn’t hit here.
-
Feeling Extremely Needy.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” creates a lot of people feeling extremely needy. It inverts the natural benefits of productivity, and makes individual productivity a burden. Those who are productive require less from others…while those who are unproductive require much from others. It incentivizes non-production. It incentivizes parasitism. The more productive you are the more others then have license to take removing the personal benefit of productivity, while the more unproductive you are the more you have license to take increasing the personal benefit of parasitism. If there was ever an idea ever so inverted to life, so perfectly designed to destroy! Such an exposition of the mind and thought process of a parasite.
-
Feeling Extremely Needy.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” creates a lot of people feeling extremely needy. It inverts the natural benefits of productivity, and makes individual productivity a burden. Those who are productive require less from others…while those who are unproductive require much from others. It incentivizes non-production. It incentivizes parasitism. The more productive you are the more others then have license to take removing the personal benefit of productivity, while the more unproductive you are the more you have license to take increasing the personal benefit of parasitism. If there was ever an idea ever so inverted to life, so perfectly designed to destroy! Such an exposition of the mind and thought process of a parasite.
-
State Sponsored Hyper-Consumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals
State Sponsored Hyper-Consumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals https://t.co/JOyvxfaPO1
-
State Sponsored Hyper-Consumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals
State Sponsored Hyper-Consumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/state-sponsored-hyper-consumption-of-goods-services-info-and-virtue-signals/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 11:49:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267423080617512960
-
State Sponsored Hyper-Consumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals
—“What we like or want may not be good for us.” — Curt Doolittle
Context of the original quote was that we have used a variety of techniques to generate hyper-consumption and especially conspicuous hyper consumption, and even worse, conspicuous hyper consumption of virtue signals. In other words, we may like hyper consumption but that does not mean it is good for us, any more than hyper-consumption of the pleasure response by drugs is, or hyper-consumption of sedation by alcohol, or hyper-consumption of calming by nicotine, or anything else in any similar spectrum. So, yes, “all things in moderation” for the individual but this isn’t enforceable if the entirety of the political economy is generating hyper-consumption for hyper-taxation, and hyper-redistribution. The state should not engage in the provision of the incentive to hyper-consume. This only benefits the financial sector. Instead, just redistribute liquidity in response to shock and sags directly to the consumer and cause business to fight over it.
-
State Sponsored Hyper-Consumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals
—“What we like or want may not be good for us.” — Curt Doolittle
Context of the original quote was that we have used a variety of techniques to generate hyper-consumption and especially conspicuous hyper consumption, and even worse, conspicuous hyper consumption of virtue signals. In other words, we may like hyper consumption but that does not mean it is good for us, any more than hyper-consumption of the pleasure response by drugs is, or hyper-consumption of sedation by alcohol, or hyper-consumption of calming by nicotine, or anything else in any similar spectrum. So, yes, “all things in moderation” for the individual but this isn’t enforceable if the entirety of the political economy is generating hyper-consumption for hyper-taxation, and hyper-redistribution. The state should not engage in the provision of the incentive to hyper-consume. This only benefits the financial sector. Instead, just redistribute liquidity in response to shock and sags directly to the consumer and cause business to fight over it.
-
State Sponsored Hyperconsumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals
State Sponsored Hyperconsumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals https://t.co/wZ0Sb47dGn
-
State Sponsored Hyperconsumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals
State Sponsored Hyperconsumption of Goods, Services, Info, and Virtue Signals https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/state-sponsored-hyperconsumption-of-goods-services-info-and-virtue-signals-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 11:48:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267422873301458946