I know this book. Doesn’t matter.
Anglo protestant sovereign vs French catholic authoritarian
Jews reform first with mendelsohn but don’t go far enough. Marx converts judaism to secularism. The Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, series of pseudoscience rises after integration by England.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 18:19:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628821794776809472
Reply addressees: @Nazboleon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628816488168583169
Moreover, they consider themselves ‘nationalists’. And Praavy Sektor as instrumental in helping overthrow the corrupt government of Yanukovych. The ukrainians do not have a putin or an FSB, or the Chechens to ‘purify’ the country of organized crime in private and public sectors.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 15:21:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628777013803728896
Reply addressees: @sue_pfh @FightRight8 @nbreavington
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628751423952265217
Scott Adams discusses “Letters of Marque” and to use them against the cartels. Everything taken can be brought home tax-free. He suggests he could see Trump doing it.
(Something we’ve added to the constitution empowering individuals to act on behalf of the people.)
Now, same thing for the border, and it will be closed.
But Scott’s argument is that it’s a statement about the failure of our government.
( Me: Joy 😉 It’s called “Going VIKING!!!!” )
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 16:03:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628425293546356748
JAMES IS WRONG OF COURSE: SOME EDUCATION FOR THE MASSES:
1) The constitution does not answer the question of secession.
2) However, upon enacting the constitution, “national sovereignty would be transferred by the new Constitution to the whole of the American people.”
3) This means that the people choose the government, and the government and the court have no say. A vote is enough. (Unanswered Question: A vote of whom?)
4) And it means that the States’ territorial unity (now continent) is of such strategic security to all, that the security of any and all are threatened by separation. In other words, the primary purpose of the federal government was military defense and sovereign security.
5) And this still means that under the constitution, the people of any state have the right to a local republican form of government.
6) In Texas v. White (1869), the Supreme Court confirmed unilateral secession unconstitutional, while commenting that revolution or consent of the states could lead to a successful secession.
7) Later court rulings have placed unconstitutional limits on the people’s right to sovereignty. These may have been practical, but they were not constitutional. The court is limited by the constitution. The constitution is limited by the people. And the people are limited by ‘Natural Law’ (Note: Which you probably don’t understand as the Science of Cooperation, but it’s not that complicated.)
8) It is absolutely positively constitutional, for anyone, including an elected officer, to advocate for national divorce. (Sorry, Marjorie no matter how we judge her, absolutely has that right)
9) And, “…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”
10) That is the right of revolution, revolt, replacement with whatever they see fit.
Conclusion:
… a) The sovereignty of the people lies with the people, and the people alone.
… b) The constitution survives until they vote that it doesn’t.
… c) And revolution may be required if voting fails – and is the people’s NATURAL, inalienable right. A right that may neither be taken from them, or voluntarily abandoned.
… d) And in the end, everything on earth is dependent upon those who are willing to use pointy objects – and the largest military in the world consists of American conservatives by something on the order of twenty times.
… e) Our military sounds impressive but consists of something on the order of 200k fighting soldiers, and 330k reserves whose loyalty is divided. Only two cities can field substantial police forces and only for short periods. Our military has failed in every insurgency. And that was during a time of never before seen asymmetric strength.
… f) In the very near future, the choice that the government, and the people would(may,will) face, is losing a world war or satisfaction of domestic conflict by restoration of the pre-civil-war constitution, to an alliance of sovereign states, guaranteed a republican government, defense of natural rights (not wanted rights), and the right to produce their own policy, commons, and culture as they see fit.
… g) because after all, a culture war only exists, because the states were deprived by way of dictate not constitution, of their right to produce the informal institutions that they prefer. The USA used west germanic (British) law to enact a copy of the germanic holy roman empire, which survived for 1000 years, until napoleon destroyed it.
And FWIW, I’ve done a revolution. The minute a democratic government shoots at you, you win.
Cheers
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 01:28:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628205042925699074
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627864664146059265
JL (all)
You speak with great confidence about a thing of demonstrable ignorance.
Population density is a vulnerability, not a strength. Conflicts are decided by a tiny minority of under one percent. Just as behavior in a polity is determined by under ten percent. Just as the most intolerant minority determines social norms. Just as the majority has no influence on the production of policy. Some of us have done a revolution. It’s trivially easy to seize and opportunity and those opportunities are heading for us at escape velocity.
How long did it take the federal government to fold in the 60’s? 3 weeks. We don’t even require a condition of violence today. We need only the threat of internal conflict and the externalities it would cause – in weeks. We are in a period of external vulnerability and internal fragility. And suffering from abuse of the peace dividend both internally and externally.
There are no conditions under which people who are hated in a polity will tolerate governance by those who hate them. Especially when the result is their disenfranchisement, disabuse, economic and political predation, and economic deprivation.
The greatest chance of victory is the certainty of conflict that leads to compromise and resolution before it accelerates. The greatest chance of conflict that causes destruction is the overconfidence that such a conflict is impossible or unwinnable.
I laud your popularization of and attack on the woke. But the tendency of public intellectuals with success in a domain to overreach to the point of harmful incompetence is the same as that of governments who overreach to the point of incompetence.
-fin-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 21:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628138967970287617
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627872904057655296
SEPARATION BY NATIONAL DIVORCE
(the choice)
It’s gonna happen.
It’s just a matter of timing.
1. Restore the constitution to a defensive federation of independent states. Complete the Natural, Common, and Concurrent Law definitions, rights, and obligations in the constitution.
2. Extend the prohibition on and criminality of, false promises, fraud, and deceit, from the commercial to the political context – ending lying in public to the public in matters public, and ending the license to lie to the people.
3. Convert the cities that have defected into independent city-states.
4. Restore standards of personal(private), public-(commons), and civil (political) in those ‘red’ territories and cities.
5. Drive the irresponsible, decadent, and dysfunctional even more into their decaying blue cities to escape the restoration of standards of personal, public and civil behavior that would prosecute them.
6. Draw the productive middle class out of the cities. Recreate the “vast open-air art museum’ that is European civilization made possible by high responsibility, high trust European Intergenerational Families.
7. Leave the decaying cities to follow the world standard of a tiny elite in the center, and vast favelas encircling them.
8. Many people are unfit for self-regulation, agency, and responsibility. Some subset of people find meaning in parenting, managing, and governing those unfit for responsibility. And those who are managed and governed can blame their governors for their condition – and do nothing responsible to change it. The vast majority of people do not want sovereignty, liberty, and freedom because each requires responsibility. What they want is sufficiency with the least responsibility and the least effort.
You are not oppressed.
You are domesticated.
Because you need to be.
We no longer seek to domesticate you.
We will no longer tolerate your destruction of us, our culture, our institutions, and our civilization, by the failure of your domestication.
We can separate and create the polities we desire, or war until enough of us are dead, that we choose to do so anyway.
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 18:50:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628104878005288994
WHY WE MUST CONTINUE TO LIBERATE PEOPLE FROM EMPIRES, AND INTO FEDERATIONS – SELF DEFENSE
Our liberties depend on producing custom commons for differing peoples in small states with low power distance and limited internal competition, thereby fostering maximum redistribution.
But our small states depend on large federations for defense, trade policy, and reciprocal insurance.
There is only safety in numbers – especially given that the USA will likely devolve back more to reflect the diversity of Europe than Europe will reflect the domestic government of empire across our Nine Nations, that is the US federal government.
There is no moral or practical argument against the continued gradual conversion of agrarian empires into industrial federations.
There is no safety for all, especially the weak, in cowardice. Europe has grown externally weak. We have grown internally weak. Perhaps the privilege of weakness that was the optimistic democratic socialist age has finally come to call its debts.
I respect Dr Peterson, but a life with the broken, the academic, the political, has failed to teach him the nature of men with real power, allies, and capacity for violence – and they are the most pragmatic and empirical of all.
It is very hard for such men to push buttons on command that mean their suicide – and the suicide of their kith and kin, to keep in place a government that you distrust.
Maybe in Islam. Maybe in Asia. But not so in Christendom.
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 16:33:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628070489393442817
Q: ~”Curt What currency would [a secessionist part of the country] use?”
A: (below)
Understand a little more clearly:
Our (our organization’s) objective is to prevent what we see as a deterministic civil war, or continued disorganized, increasingly rapid collapse, by repeating the founding of the country with a Common Law suit against the state for the redress of grievances.
Our political system cannot scale to a domestic empire of this scale, especially when occupied as the world policemen of communication, finance, transport, and trade, without the support of the taxation produced by an equivalent empire.
We find it somewhat difficult to believe that the majority of the population would not prefer the solutions will propose – they benefit all at the expense of the federal bureaucracy, the predatory financial sector, the media, and the academy. And they radically alter our economy at least as significant as the Roman reforms.
But we have exhausted debate between our factions. We have exhausted the capacity of the electoral system to solve this question by voting. Will very likely exhaust the capacity of the courts to restore enough of the constitution that our problems are legally recoverable.
We are left, upon exhaustion of the courts, with a suit against the state (legislature) in a repetition of the founding fathers’ suit against the crown, culminating in the declaration of independence – or lastly, we are left with a bloody civil war none of us wants, but too many of us anticipate, and some look forward to with joy.
Why? We have learned that the industrial revolution has freed us not just of labor but of the social, political, and economic necessity of cooperation and compromise with those who have the feminine moral bias in favor of what we call communalism or communism and minimum responsibility for the average person, and what we call the masculine or republican or European tradition of maximization of responsibility for the average person.
In other words we are seeing an overwhelming want and need to choose opposite paths for our futures. This plays out in every domain of life, from the Scandinavian evidence that the more freedom we have to choose our futures, the less we compromise, and more we follow our natural instincts to feminine empathizing and masculine systematizing: the experience in time vs the outcomes over time.
So it’s time for a national divorce. We have run the experiment of the marxist, feminist, race-marxist sequence and we have ended up hating each other.
We no longer wish to live with people who hate us, who wish to eradicate our people, eradicate our traditions, and eradicate our culture, institutions, and history.
We wish you well in your continued experiment with the repetition of the mistakes of every other civilization in the world that led to equality in stagnation and poverty during the early middle ages.
We wish to restore the grand European tradition that made Europe a vast open air museum to the achievements of man, and that dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early death, violence, crime, and the vicissitudes of nature.
You are welcome to choose for yourselves.
You may not choose for us.
And we have no wish to choose for you.
And we can no longer pay the costs of your social destruction by the social construction of the false promise that there is an alternative to our traditions that will produce an equal or better outcome for all.
Our Christian religion is just natural law in theological garb. Our Constitution is just natural law in philosophical garb. In reality, it’s just physics under that theology and philosophy.
We live by the science of man – not the ideology that the science of man and the natural world can be altered by the social construction of a novel religion that is a mere repetition of those that have failed mankind for millennia.
Divorce it is.
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 01:44:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627846603624140801
I think you have reading disability. 😉
United States: A federation of independent states.
Apparently, you don’t know the meaning of ‘state’.
A state is an independent political corporation with territorial and other assets, managed by a government, and operated by citizens (people).
In the constitution, the federal government insures the citizens of each state a republican government.
The federal government, in response to the civil war, and later in response to the threat of communism that threatened another civil war (FDR), exceeded its powers to regulate culture within states instead of guaranteeing each state its own republican government, which produced the culture desired by the people within the state.
The problem arose in the construction of the bill of rights, which was incomplete, and the construction of the constitution which did not explain the Natural Law, the Common Law in dispute resolution, and Concurrency of Legislation, and while enumerating rights did not enumerate the obligations and inalienations to protect them.
Unfortunately, some of these concepts were assumed. They were written in Blackstone as understood by all the founders. But they were not compiled from Blackstone into the constitution. So, without the history of English political documents and law, Hume, Smith, Locke, the Federalist Papers, and Blackstone, the constitution contained about eight holes that ‘the enemy crept thru’.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 18:30:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627737414897655810
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627734602939879425
(Sorry. You misunderstood. City-States. The big blue cities would be converted into separate states which is the traditional solution in continental Europe. Precisely because producers have different social and political needs that consumers and traders.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 18:06:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627731504511033345
Reply addressees: @imhoppy2 @DeanObeidallah @mtgreenee
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627730215773536256