Theme: Sovereignty

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @SlangHues Just to begin, the purpose of individual sovereign

    RT @curtdoolittle: @SlangHues Just to begin, the purpose of individual sovereignty is not for the individual but to compensate individuals…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-17 15:17:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658854348468658176

  • Just to begin, the purpose of individual sovereignty is not for the individual b

    Just to begin, the purpose of individual sovereignty is not for the individual but to compensate individuals for for the production of commons. Western civ isn’t individualistic per se, its an an engine (organization) for the production of commons that produce discounts for all unachievable by other means, including maximum prosperity while maximizing innovation adaptation and evolutionary velocity.

    Reply addressees: @SlangHues


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-17 00:22:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658629063831875585

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658554391841087488

  • Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY,

    Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY, AND NATURALITY? (“to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature”) #law

    1. Commonality: the requirement that the legitimacy of law (findings of the court) is determined by empirical evidence of commonality of judgments across regions.

    2. Concurrency: the requirement for empirical evidence that all legislation be agreed upon by the concurrency of regions, classes, (and now sexes).

    3. Therefore: Commonality and Concurrency limit legislation (contracts of the commons), and law (findings of the court), to that which people have already agreed upon.

    4. Therefore the prohibition on authority, whether by the tyranny of a minority or a majority: the people must be persuaded by a concurrence of regions and classes in legislative contracts and commonality of judgments across regions and classes, such that the legislature that represents them is acting on the will of the people despite their differences.

    5. Settled Law: The legislature and the courts are required to produce ‘settled law’ by the tests of commonality and concurrency, thereby prohibiting authority.

    6. Natural Law (Empirical Science of Settled Law): Natural Law is identified by the evidence of dispute resolutions over time – in the case of Europe, over the course of the five thousand years of our history and traditions back to the discovery of contractual civilization on the pontic steppe. Natural law, or what we call ‘tort’ consists of the universal (militia) reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (you’ve paid for one way or another), limiting us to reciprocity in display word and deed, and voluntary markets for cooperation, and the courts in matters of non cooperation: the resolution of disputes.

    7. Natural Rights (Empirical Science of Rights, Obligations and Inalienations): Natural rights, obligations, and inalienations are those discovered and enumerated that are necessary for the preservation of soverignty and reciprocity in display word and deed. As such we have achieved commonality and concurrency over time, independent of the present moment: as such the criminal never voluntarily abandons his crimes without the threat of force. And as such, the court need no approval for the prosecution of violations of natural rights already determined over centuries by commonality. Men and women constantly invent new crimes over time that attempt to violate the natural law and natural rights.

    8. Transactional Law: Legislation, Regulation, and Law are measures of the concurrency and commonality of the people in a time, place, and context, creating an accounting ledge of rules the people have consented to. … … (a) words are weights and measures of time and place
    … (b) people use terms in the context of time and place.
    … (c) people use terms to express meaning with the available weights and measures provided by those terms.
    … (d) as such the interpretation of a term (meaning) is dependent upon both the context of time and place and the context constructed by the person using it within that context of time and place.
    … (e) therefore words have no meaning independent of the context of time, place, author, and his intent.
    … (f) And laws are interpreted in these contexts.
    … (g) Why? To prevent deception of the court and jury on the one hand and to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature on the other.

    9. Western civilization is just science combined with heroism: the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. No other civilization is scientific. The rest are either philosophical(China) or theological(MENA), mythical(India), or magical(Africa).

    Why isn’t this taught in gradeschool to every single person is obvious: there are those seditious and treasonous among us who seek to impose their authority by circumvention of the demand for commonality and concurrency.

    We call them ‘leftists’. Because all leftism is crime, sedition, and treason against our civilization. That’s what defines leftism: inventions in criminality that have not yet been outlawed by court or legislature.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-16 18:55:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658546773256724499

  • Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY,

    Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY, AND NATURALITY?
    (“to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature”) #law

    Commonality: the requirement that the legitimacy of law (findings of the court) is determined by empirical evidence of commonality of judgments across regions.
    Concurrency: the requirement for empirical evidence that all legislation be agreed upon by the concurrency of regions, classes, (and now sexes).
    Therefore: Commonality and Concurrency limit legislation (contracts of the commons), and law (findings of the court), to that which people have already agreed upon.
    Therefore the prohibition on authority, whether by the tyranny of a minority or a majority: the people must be persuaded by a concurrence of regions and classes in legislative contracts and commonality of judgments across regions and classes, such that the legislature that represents them is acting on the will of the people despite their differences.
    Settled Law: The legislature and the courts are required to produce ‘settled law’ by the tests of commonality and concurrency, thereby prohibiting authority.
    Natural Law (Empirical Science of Settled Law): Natural Law is identified by the evidence of dispute resolutions over time – in the case of Europe, over the course of the five thousand years of our history and traditions back to the discovery of contractual civilization on the pontic steppe. Natural law, or what we call ‘tort’ consists of the universal (militia) reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (you’ve paid for one way or another), limiting us to reciprocity in display word and deed, and voluntary markets for cooperation, and the courts in matters of non cooperation: the resolution of disputes.
    Natural Rights (Empirical Science of Rights, Obligations and Inalienations): Natural rights, obligations, and inalienations are those discovered and enumerated that are necessary for the preservation of soverignty and reciprocity in display word and deed. As such we have achieved commonality and concurrency over time, independent of the present moment: as such the criminal never voluntarily abandons his crimes without the threat of force. And as such, the court need no approval for the prosecution of violations of natural rights already determined over centuries by commonality. Men and women constantly invent new crimes over time that attempt to violate the natural law and natural rights.
    Transactional Law: Legislation, Regulation, and Law are measures of the concurrency and commonality of the people in a time, place, and context, creating an accounting ledge of rules the people have consented to.
    (a) words are weights and measures of time and place (b) people use terms in the context of time and place. (c) people use terms to express meaning with the available weights and measures provided by those terms.
    (d) as such the interpretation of a term (meaning) is dependent upon both the context of time and place and the context constructed by the person using it within that context of time and place.
    (e) therefore words have no meaning independent of the context of time, place, author, and his intent.
    (f) And laws are interpreted in these contexts.
    (g) Why? To prevent deception of the court and jury on the one hand and to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature on the other.

    Western civilization is just science combined with heroism: the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. No other civilization is scientific. The rest are either philosophical(China) or theological(MENA), mythical(India), or magical(Africa).

    Why isn’t this taught in gradeschool to every single person is obvious: there are those seditious and treasonous among us who seek to impose their authority by circumvention of the demand for commonality and concurrency.

    We call them ‘leftists’. Because all leftism is crime, sedition, and treason against our civilization. That’s what defines leftism: inventions in criminality that have not yet been outlawed by court or legislature.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-16 14:00:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658472499158585344

  • Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY AND COMMONALIT

    Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY AND COMMONALITY, AND NATURALITY?
    (“to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature”) #law

    Commonality: the requirement that legitimacy of law (findings of the court) is determined by empirical evidence of commonality of judgments across regions.
    Concurrency: the requirement for empirical evidence that all legislation be agreed upon by the concurrency of regions, classes, (and now sexes).
    Therefore: Commonality and Concurrency limit legislation (contracts of the commons), and law (findings of the court), to that which people have already agreed upon.
    Therefore the prohibition on authority, whether by the tyranny of a minority or a majority: the people must be persuaded by a concurrence of regions and classes in legislative contracts and commonality of judgments across regions and classes, such that the legislature that represents them is acting on the will of the people despite their differences.
    Settled Law: The legislature and the courts are required to produce ‘settled law’ by the tests of commonality and concurrency, thereby prohibiting authority.
    Natural Law (Empirical Science of Settled Law): Natural Law is identified by the evidence of dispute resolutions over time – in the case of Europe, over the course of the five thousand years of our history and traditions back to the discovery of contractual civilization on the pontic steppe. Natural law, or what we call ‘tort’ consists of the universal (militia) reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (you’ve paid for one way or another), limiting us to reciprocity in display word and deed, and voluntary markets for cooperation, and the courts in matters of non cooperation: the resolution of disputes.
    Natural Rights (Empirical Science of Rights, Obligations and Inalienations): Natural rights, obligations, and inalienations are those discovered and enumerated that are necessary for the preservation of soverignty and reciprocity in display word and deed. As such we have achieved commonality and concurrency over time, independent of the present moment: as such the criminal never voluntarily abandons his crimes without the threat of force. And as such, the court need no approval for the prosecution of violations of natural rights already determined over centuries by commonality. Men and women constantly invent new crimes over time that attempt to violate the natural law and natural rights.
    Transactional Law: Legislation, Regulation, and Law are measures of the concurrency and commonality of the people in a time, place, and context, creating an accounting ledge of rules the people have consented to.
    (a) words are weights and measures of time and place (b) people use terms in the context of time and place. (c) people use terms to express meaning with the available weights and measures provided by those terms.
    (d) as such the interpretation of a term (meaning) is dependent upon both the context of time and place and the context constructed by the person using it within that context of time and place.
    (e) therefore words have no meaning independent of the context of time, place, author, and his intent.
    (f) And laws are interpreted in these contexts.
    (g) Why? To prevent deception of the court and jury on the one hand and to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature on the other.

    Western civilization is just science combined with heroism: the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. No other civilization is scientific. The rest are either philosophical(China) or theological(MENA), mythical(India), or magical(Africa).

    Why isn’t this taught in gradeschool to every single person is obvious: there are those seditious and treasonous among us who seek to impose their authority by circumvention of the demand for commonality and concurrency.

    We call them ‘leftists’. Because all leftism is crime, sedition, and treason against our civilization. That’s what defines leftism: inventions in criminality that have not yet been outlawed by court or legislature.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-16 14:00:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658470075232337922

  • Great framing. Start with the presumption of liberty and work backward. Nice. 😉

    Great framing.
    Start with the presumption of liberty and work backward.
    Nice. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 21:01:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657853541099139078

    Reply addressees: @AlvaroMorono

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657853284852416515

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: NOMOCRATIC MONARCHY Competence hierarchy of sovereign men par

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: NOMOCRATIC MONARCHY

    Competence hierarchy of sovereign men participating in reciprocal, voluntary interaction via marke…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 19:12:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657826313997103105

  • WHAT DO WE MEAN BY MONARCHY? –“It’s not even, technically speaking, a monarchy

    WHAT DO WE MEAN BY MONARCHY?

    –“It’s not even, technically speaking, a monarchy if the monarch doesn’t have a final say, make the exceptions and interpretations.” – Martin Stepan (@TheAutistocrat)

    Agreed.
    0. Kingdom (non european)
    1. … monarchy (christian european, c.e.)
    2. … … vs constitutional monarchy (c.e.)
    3. … … … vs natural law constitutional monarchy.(c.e.)

    Under the natural law modern state invented by the British, the monarchy is a via negative judge of last resort in the hierarchy of courts, that is outside the law only in the preservation and restoration of the law, the natural law, and the defense of the commons of the people.

    Now you won’t find this explicitly stated by others because of the rather archaic romantic traditional, philosophical Christian and enlightenment framing of rights and obligations under the traditional law and traditional philosophy. It is, however, exactly how Elizabeth’s and now Charles’ rights, obligations, and inalienations are captured in British law.

    (Why do I need to be the first person who does the grunt work of ‘sciencing’ anglo, germanic, and western civilization? 😉 )

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 18:54:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657821750216761345

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657759552538902530

  • RT @WalterIII: The simplified answer to why monarchy is valuable: Owners take ca

    RT @WalterIII: The simplified answer to why monarchy is valuable: Owners take care of things better than renters do.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 18:46:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657819736418267139

  • “Q: Curt: Why do you advocate for monarchy?”– Technically I advocate for rule o

    –“Q: Curt: Why do you advocate for monarchy?”–

    Technically I advocate for rule of law by the natural law and monarchy is a necessary institution. Meaning monarchy provides a judge of last resort given the tendency of all political organizations to fail, due to accumulated… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1657682675803496449