Theme: Sovereignty

  • Well, it looks like Merkel gave Putin permission, and Putin is now invading Ukra

    Well, it looks like Merkel gave Putin permission, and Putin is now invading Ukraine.

    #ukraine #invasion #russia


    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-28 09:03:00 UTC

  • The Aristocratic Contract vs Patriotism


    [I] don’t like the word patriot, because it suggests fealty to church or state. Instead: the obligation of every man who accepts the aristocratic contract is to deny power to any and all over any and all.

    In this sense patriotism is impossible for members of the aristocracy because it implies a moral choice rather than a necessary contractual obligation to all other members of the aristocratic corporation.

  • The Aristocratic Contract vs Patriotism


    [I] don’t like the word patriot, because it suggests fealty to church or state. Instead: the obligation of every man who accepts the aristocratic contract is to deny power to any and all over any and all.

    In this sense patriotism is impossible for members of the aristocracy because it implies a moral choice rather than a necessary contractual obligation to all other members of the aristocratic corporation.

  • PUTIN’S EQUIPMENT RAID ON UKRAINE Russia ships in not 30 but 200 trucks, of supp

    PUTIN’S EQUIPMENT RAID ON UKRAINE

    Russia ships in not 30 but 200 trucks, of supplies, resupplies, and arms, and ships back the heavy equipment from the arms factories. The reason Russia wanted eastern Ukraine is because that’s where Russian weapons technology is manufactured. So just as the soviets stole the german machinery and using it at home, the Russians are stealing what is really, their own machinery from Ukraine, to use at home.

    We can see this a number of ways, but as far as I can tell, it means that they have no hope of holding onto the territory that they keep losing and soon Ukraine will have the ability to destroy the factories and equipment and at that point, Russia has no material incentive in the short term.

    We have been saying for six months that they way to eliminate Russian pretexts was to just start off by destroying the factories, but without air power Ukraine cannot to it. Russia and Yanukovich conspired to weaken the Ukrainian military over the past few years, so badly that the impoverished country has to rebuild all from nothing – and the west is useless and nothing but a betrayer of promises.

    Again, rather than destroying cities and displacing hundreds of thousands, and destroying all hope of Russian participation in world affairs until Putin dies, it would have been trivially simple to simply buy the east and the peninsula districts from Kiev. The rest of the country wants to get rid of them anyway. It’s the home of most of our scumbags.

    Stupid.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-24 08:56:00 UTC

  • RUSSIANS AREN’T EVEN PRETENDING ANY MORE They are now regularly capturing Russia

    RUSSIANS AREN’T EVEN PRETENDING ANY MORE

    They are now regularly capturing Russian Regulars (uniformed military personnel) in eastern Ukraine. My people, who just got back from Cyprus, watching Russian television there, were laughing at how absurd Russian media is. I mean, they have crews fabricating nonsense full time. It’s amazing.

    Ukrainians aren’t that creative.

    Like I said. Russians will believe anything – the more conspiratorial the more believable.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-22 14:59:00 UTC

  • How Does The Libertarian Party View The Electoral College? Are There Any Reasons, If They Do Or Do Not?

    The libertarian argument would suggest that if an electoral college is necessary to prevent the imposition of the will of the populated states upon the less populated states that it is time to move to nullification and secession.  Any statement beyond that is mere pragmatism on the part of the party members.

    https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-Libertarian-party-view-the-electoral-college-Are-there-any-reasons-if-they-do-or-do-not

  • How Does The Libertarian Party View The Electoral College? Are There Any Reasons, If They Do Or Do Not?

    The libertarian argument would suggest that if an electoral college is necessary to prevent the imposition of the will of the populated states upon the less populated states that it is time to move to nullification and secession.  Any statement beyond that is mere pragmatism on the part of the party members.

    https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-Libertarian-party-view-the-electoral-college-Are-there-any-reasons-if-they-do-or-do-not

  • WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF A NATIONALIST RUSSIA – NATIONALISM IS A GOOD THING WE NEED

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/how-nationalism-came-to-dominate-russia-s-political-mainstream/504495.htmlNO WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF A NATIONALIST RUSSIA – NATIONALISM IS A GOOD THING WE NEED MORE OF

    We westerners are not terrified of a Nationalistic Russia. The Western right LOVES a nationalist Russia. We WANT a strong Russia. What the west doesn’t want, and the world doesn’t want, is a breakdown of the postwar consensus on fixed borders. And none of the eastern europeans want to be subjected to more Russian deceit, corruption, violence and murder. Russia is a corrupt country, with a corrupt government, and russians demonstrate low trust, and low regard for the commons. Europeans, even western europeans, desire a high trust western society, with high regard for the commons. Russians depend on resource wealth to compenate for their low trust and corrupt society. Eastern europeans cannot depend upon resource wealth – they must generate economies that participate with the rest of the world.

    All this moralizing and propaganda from Russia is just populist nonsense. We assumed Russia would mature into a modern democracy by slowly building an economy that integrated with the rest of the world.

    A nationalist Russia that is militarily strong is good for the west since it keeps Russia’s eastern conflict zone, and southern spheres of influence, with their 90 IQ societies, from being a problem for the rest of the world. The west needs a strong Russia. What the west doesn’t need is for Russia to spread the corruption, dishonesty, and low-trust of Russian society to countries that must participate in the world economy to obtain a western standard of living.

    It’s not complicated.

    ——

    LETTER TO RUSSIA FROM KIEV

    Dear Russia,

    We love you ok. You’re white. So we actually consider you part of the tribe. And yes, we westerners are kind of destroying Western civilization with abandon. And you’re right to reject that. And while we really don’t want to be in conflict with you, we do ask you to please keep your dysfunctional family, and dysfunctional political problems in your own house. We have problems but your problems are worse. Corruption, deception, pseudoscience, alcoholism, violence and mass murder are things russians are really good at. And we really don’t need you to export them to us. I mean, you killed enough of us already, haven’t you?

    And you kind of screwed up right? You could have let the USA continue withdrawing from Europe, softly guaranteed Europe’s safety militarily, and protect shipping on the high seas, and continued to spend the next 20 years integrating Russian resource dependence into the western economies. You could have imported western technology and law, behavior, and exported ‘resources, manliness, nationalism, and unity’ to the west. You could have accomplished the unification of the circumpolar peoples.

    But you screwed up. Yet again.

    Why is it that Russians, at every opportunity, make the wrong decision? It’s just amazing. It’s exasperating. Every time you can play the long run you screw it up.

    Please get your act together, and lead.

    Russia: why are you constantly the white people who fail?

    Thanks.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-04 02:12:00 UTC

  • ***Let a thousand kingdoms bloom***

    ***Let a thousand kingdoms bloom***


    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-02 05:37:00 UTC

  • IN OUR QUEST FOR POWER WE GAVE POWER TO EVERYONE ELSE We didn’t realize, that wh

    IN OUR QUEST FOR POWER WE GAVE POWER TO EVERYONE ELSE

    We didn’t realize, that when we we started the enlightenment, that our appeal to universalism, which allowed us to collect the numbers needed to seize power from the aristocracy, that we were by consequence, also advocating that non-family members to use the same arguments to conquer us.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 05:39:00 UTC