Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • THE ONLY EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY IS CONSTRUCTED BY NOMOCRACY – WHEREIN NO

    THE ONLY EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY IS CONSTRUCTED BY NOMOCRACY – WHEREIN NO ONE RULES BECAUSE EVERYONE RULES.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 04:09:00 UTC

  • Raise The Cost Of Tyranny Through Violence

    [T]he only way to obtain liberty is to raise the cost of tyranny, just as the only means of constructing property is to raise the cost of parasitism. We can raise costs by a) gossip – meaning shaming, b) economic ostracization – meaning boycott, and c) violence. a) does not work for obvious reasons – the incentives to act as a parasite are superior under redistributive government. b) does not work, since we are actively prohibited by law from ostracization and separatism. Therefore (c) violence, is our only choice. Since even with small numbers we can dramatically raise the cost of parasitism upon us, and the destruction of our family and civilization. Thankfully, at no time in human history, save perhaps during the sea people’s period, has civilizatino been so fragile. It is the easiest period in which we can restore our liberty. Or lose it forever.

  • Raise The Cost Of Tyranny Through Violence

    [T]he only way to obtain liberty is to raise the cost of tyranny, just as the only means of constructing property is to raise the cost of parasitism. We can raise costs by a) gossip – meaning shaming, b) economic ostracization – meaning boycott, and c) violence. a) does not work for obvious reasons – the incentives to act as a parasite are superior under redistributive government. b) does not work, since we are actively prohibited by law from ostracization and separatism. Therefore (c) violence, is our only choice. Since even with small numbers we can dramatically raise the cost of parasitism upon us, and the destruction of our family and civilization. Thankfully, at no time in human history, save perhaps during the sea people’s period, has civilizatino been so fragile. It is the easiest period in which we can restore our liberty. Or lose it forever.

  • Untitled

    Why Putin’s ‘Russification’ Campaign Against the Baltics Should Be Big News for Us

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-29 13:01:00 UTC

  • (worth repeating) Ukraine does not need a big mechanized military, but universal

    (worth repeating)

    Ukraine does not need a big mechanized military, but universal training on the swiss model; near universal small arms; to fill the armories with RPGs, and to focus on training soldiers with mobile artillery, including air defense, and to keep the army limited to very good special forces that rotate training of the civilians. If ukraine has this and six nuclear weapons they will be a free people. Russia is a one-city country. The centrality is its weakness. Nuclear arms guarantee Ukrainian sovereignty. special forces and a militia (which ukrainians are culturally disposed to anyway) will make occupation of the country literally impossible.

    The central point being that large mechanized infantry is not necessary for the defense of ukraine. Large vehicles and concentrated forces are just targets.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-23 10:00:00 UTC

  • SWITZERLAND IS THE ONLY REMAINING EUROPEAN COUNTRY (worth repeating) Switzerland

    SWITZERLAND IS THE ONLY REMAINING EUROPEAN COUNTRY

    (worth repeating)

    Switzerland is the only country that evaded the post-Napoleonic statist phase, because they never had the need or opportunity to construct a bureaucracy capable of total war. As such Switzerland is the only surviving ‘European’ country.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-23 08:54:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE IS EVIDENCE OF THE FOLLY OF HOPPE’S DEFINITION OF PROPERTY We have an ol

    UKRAINE IS EVIDENCE OF THE FOLLY OF HOPPE’S DEFINITION OF PROPERTY

    We have an oligarchical government in Ukraine. That government is populated by the people who own the property – not judges resolving conflicts. What has happened is that they either rent seek, privatize commons, or socialize losses wherever possible.

    As far as I can see, Rothbardian and Hoppeian arguments lead to Ukrainian despotism. Without prohibition on involuntary transfer of property-en-toto by full informed voluntary exchange, and the requirement for productivity, the law cannot be used to construct a condition of liberty.

    We have Hoppeian/Rothbardian law here. The courts resolve conflicts in physical property only.

    Hence, systemic, intergenerational parasitism.

    Hoppe may be right that only property matters in so far as he means it. However, Hoppe is wrong that the scope of property can be limited to the intersubjectively verifiable.

    Either your law is predicated upon property en toto, or you gave up your wealth of violence in exchange for being subject to indirect and dishonest predation.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-11 03:18:00 UTC

  • MORAL ARGUMENT AND RUSSIA’S AGGRESSION It was entirely possible, and often recom

    MORAL ARGUMENT AND RUSSIA’S AGGRESSION

    It was entirely possible, and often recommended, that Russia purchase Crimea and Donbas from Ukraine, by means of discounted oil price for 99 years. This would have been mutually beneficial, since the Donbas was the source of most ukrainian corruption, gangsters, and russophilia. And was the responsible for the political divisiveness that prevented reform.

    The Russians systematically conquered eastern Ukraine over the past two centuries, and created a false mythology to justify the muscovite conquest of european lands. Ukrainians had frequent debates about splitting the country. And this was the correct, non-aggressive means of solving the problem for all sides. But solving the problem was not the Russian intentino. The Russian intention is to preserve their power by preventing the spread of capitalism into Russia by the same form of uprisings that have restored Poland and Ukraine to european civilization after Muscovite (mongolian) conquest.

    I have only one moral principle I must follow: liberty for all who will exchange it with me. But in exchange for liberty I require not only insurance of physical property, but truth telling: the total prohibition of parasitism. Because without the total prohibition of parasitism, it is irrational for me to forgo the utility of violence to obtain what I desire.

    This demand for the total suppression of parasitism what separates european aristocratic liberty, from parasitic libertine pretenses of liberty.

    Speak the truth, by warrantying your speech, or admit that you do not warranty your speech to be truthful, and as such engage in parasitism:

    1 – Internally consistent (logical)

    2 – Externally correspondent. (empirical)

    3 – Operationally Defined (praxeological)

    4 – Free of parasitism, consisting only of voluntary transfers. (moral)

    5 – Parsimonious (falsified)

    We must end parasitic deceits in the pursuit of liberty. Rothbardian ethics are another pseudoscientific, elaborate, cosmopolitan deceit, just as Freudian Psychologizing, and Marxist History.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-10 06:29:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IN DISCOURSE ON RUSSIAS AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE It is one thing to say:

    TRUTH IN DISCOURSE ON RUSSIAS AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE

    It is one thing to say:

    1) THE CONTRACTUAL:

    –“–“We are obligated to assist those who desire liberty in the construction of liberty, because the exchange of such insurance is the only possible means by which liberty can be constructed. We believe that we cannot win this fight. But our contract with one another for the preservation and expansion of liberty is an inviolable one without self contradiction, and as such, I saddle up, and go to war in the hope the I err in my estimate of the enemy.”–

    2) THE TRUTHFUL AND PRAGMATIC:

    –“We are obligated to assist those who desire liberty in the construction of liberty, because the exchange of such insurance is the only possible means by which liberty can be constructed. However we believe that we cannot win this fight.”–

    3) AN IRRELEVANT JUSTIFICTATION FOR FREE RIDING

    “the USA does not need another war to fight, and it only expands the state and bureaucracy”.

    OR

    “I want americans to withdraw from around the world”

    VERSUS

    4) AN IMMORAL JUSTIFICATION OF FREE RIDING

    –“Russians were justified in the combination of deceit and aggression.”—

    VERSUS

    5) AN OUTRIGHT DECEIT AND CONSPIRATORIAL ACTION

    –“Russians did not commit an act of deceit or aggression”–

    Immoral-tarians choose the fourth and fifth options. Classical liberal pragmatists the third, and aristocracy the first two.

    There is only one liberty possible: aristocracy.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-10 06:09:00 UTC

  • Mark. So you mean to argue that it is immoral or illogical for people to struggl

    Mark.

    So you mean to argue that it is immoral or illogical for people to struggle to free themselves of tyranny and poverty? And that it is immoral or illogical to send them weapons to free themselves of tyranny and poverty?

    And that you are so omniscient, knowledgeable and wise that you can predict the future of these people?

    Do you mean to justify statism? Do you mean to justify invasion? Do you mean to justify the usurpation of borders? Do you mean to justify aggression by military means? Do you mean to state that the Ukrainian people, to whom Russians prosecuted a holocaust and intentional starvation to kill the by the millions have nothing to fear from the most murderous neighbour possible other than China?

    I have met you and only spoken with you a bit. And I don’t necessarily think you are a liar.

    I think that like most libertines you are just punching far above your intellectual weight, and the combination off elf indoctrination into libertine ideology, a genetic anti-social bias and dunning Krueger blind you on the one hand and find outlet for your rage on the other.

    Your argument like most libertine arguments is immoral as I stated above; is the reason libertines fail in the moral marketplace; and is motivated by self congratulatory status masturbation to compensate for low desirability.

    The only difference between Ukrainians and Canadians is the influence of the neighbouring empire.

    America is not good. But Russia is the opposite of Liberty.

    Liberty evolved because we spoke the truth.

    Russia industrialised lying and turned it into a military doctrine.

    And you’ve been conquered by it.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-10 04:52:00 UTC