Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • Markets In Everything – And Economists Circumventing them.

    MARKETS IN EVERYTHING? THE WESTERN MODEL OF SOVEREIGNTY A market for reproduction (family). A market for production (goods and services), a market for commons (government), a market for dispute resolution (common law), and a market for polities (voluntary association and disassociation). If you advocate for majority democracy by assent instead of market for commons under juridical defense, then you are just a fool and a thief like any other. It surprises me that you will hear economists justly criticize the misapplication of the economics of the family and small business to the international business, and government. Yet in the next breath advocate majoritarian democracy and the use of aggregates to conduct involuntary exchanges, rather than to construct a market for the voluntary exchange of commons uder juridical dissent in the next. Economists regularly justify their preconceptions and utilitarian biases by applying the decision-making of the tribe to that of the nation and empire. If there were voluntary construction of market commons rather than thefts by aggregation, think of (a) what economists would research instead of what they research today, and (b) what we would know about economics as a consequence rather than what we know today, and (c) how empowered each of us would be vs today, and (d) how we could solve problems of conflict between groups that we cannot solve today. Monopoly Majoritarian Representative Commons Production (Democratic government) is the origin of political conflict – NOT the solution to it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Markets In Everything – And Economists Circumventing them.

    MARKETS IN EVERYTHING? THE WESTERN MODEL OF SOVEREIGNTY A market for reproduction (family). A market for production (goods and services), a market for commons (government), a market for dispute resolution (common law), and a market for polities (voluntary association and disassociation). If you advocate for majority democracy by assent instead of market for commons under juridical defense, then you are just a fool and a thief like any other. It surprises me that you will hear economists justly criticize the misapplication of the economics of the family and small business to the international business, and government. Yet in the next breath advocate majoritarian democracy and the use of aggregates to conduct involuntary exchanges, rather than to construct a market for the voluntary exchange of commons uder juridical dissent in the next. Economists regularly justify their preconceptions and utilitarian biases by applying the decision-making of the tribe to that of the nation and empire. If there were voluntary construction of market commons rather than thefts by aggregation, think of (a) what economists would research instead of what they research today, and (b) what we would know about economics as a consequence rather than what we know today, and (c) how empowered each of us would be vs today, and (d) how we could solve problems of conflict between groups that we cannot solve today. Monopoly Majoritarian Representative Commons Production (Democratic government) is the origin of political conflict – NOT the solution to it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Sovereignty: Requires Markets In Everything

    LIBERTY (SOVEREIGNTY): MARKETS IN EVERYTHING

    • Survival (competition)
    • Reproduction (Marriage)
    • Production (economy)
    • Commons (market govt)
    • Displute Resolution (natural law)
    • Group Evolutionary Strategy (Polities)

    Hayek was right of course. He could have taken it even farther. But he was right. The answer to Keynes(demand/spending) and Hayek(disinformation/misallocation) is solved by credit cards from the treasury – assuming liquidity isn’t predictable. It needs to remain a lottery of uncertainty. The problem they were struggling with was distribution. The financial system is a corrupt distributor, and state spending is even worse distributor of corruption.

  • Sovereignty: Requires Markets In Everything

    LIBERTY (SOVEREIGNTY): MARKETS IN EVERYTHING

    • Survival (competition)
    • Reproduction (Marriage)
    • Production (economy)
    • Commons (market govt)
    • Displute Resolution (natural law)
    • Group Evolutionary Strategy (Polities)

    Hayek was right of course. He could have taken it even farther. But he was right. The answer to Keynes(demand/spending) and Hayek(disinformation/misallocation) is solved by credit cards from the treasury – assuming liquidity isn’t predictable. It needs to remain a lottery of uncertainty. The problem they were struggling with was distribution. The financial system is a corrupt distributor, and state spending is even worse distributor of corruption.

  • Absent Juridical Defense, We Must Return To Violence.

    As Sovereign men we create juridical defense to keep peace among equals. We appeal to the MARKET OF PEERS (JURY) FOR resolution of the disputes. Thus submitting to the peers, and asking for equal treatment as is due all peers: insurance against the imposition of costs. But if we lack juridical defense, or are prevented from juridical defense, then there is no reason by which we can seek insurance by the group, and instead, must self-insure, by restitution, punishment, and if necessary death, of those who impose upon us. As far as I know we can kill Soros.

  • Absent Juridical Defense, We Must Return To Violence.

    As Sovereign men we create juridical defense to keep peace among equals. We appeal to the MARKET OF PEERS (JURY) FOR resolution of the disputes. Thus submitting to the peers, and asking for equal treatment as is due all peers: insurance against the imposition of costs. But if we lack juridical defense, or are prevented from juridical defense, then there is no reason by which we can seek insurance by the group, and instead, must self-insure, by restitution, punishment, and if necessary death, of those who impose upon us. As far as I know we can kill Soros.

  • Classical Liberal Conservative Libertarian

    I AM A CONTRACTUALIST: A CLASSICAL LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE LIBERTARIAN. If you want to classify me, I am a contractualist. This means a classical liberal, libertarian. I am conservative because I’m an empiricist. And I am a Nationalist because I’m from a germanic, martial class by intuition, and because as an empiricist I understand the superior ability to govern contractually under homogeneity. So I know how my work on truthfulness sounds to contemporary people, just as I am aware how Darwin, Hume, Machiavelli, and Socrates were considered immoral people, and how western contractualism in its current degraded form, sounds immoral to less advanced peoples. If I **DIDN”T** make you feel a moral twinge, then I wouldn’t be advancing human understanding by reordering values. The difference is that I’m trying to improve human conditions for prosperity not dominate others, harm others, or even exclude others. The problem is that exclusion of differences in strategies is necessary for the development of the prosperity and peace that contractualism provides for us. Curt Doolittle

  • Classical Liberal Conservative Libertarian

    I AM A CONTRACTUALIST: A CLASSICAL LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE LIBERTARIAN. If you want to classify me, I am a contractualist. This means a classical liberal, libertarian. I am conservative because I’m an empiricist. And I am a Nationalist because I’m from a germanic, martial class by intuition, and because as an empiricist I understand the superior ability to govern contractually under homogeneity. So I know how my work on truthfulness sounds to contemporary people, just as I am aware how Darwin, Hume, Machiavelli, and Socrates were considered immoral people, and how western contractualism in its current degraded form, sounds immoral to less advanced peoples. If I **DIDN”T** make you feel a moral twinge, then I wouldn’t be advancing human understanding by reordering values. The difference is that I’m trying to improve human conditions for prosperity not dominate others, harm others, or even exclude others. The problem is that exclusion of differences in strategies is necessary for the development of the prosperity and peace that contractualism provides for us. Curt Doolittle

  • Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, Consumption

    SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, CONSUMPTION Sovereignty is the necessary objective. (Aristocratic Class) Liberty is the existential condition. (Bourgeoise Class) Freedom is the felt experience. (Working Class) Consumption is desired equivalent ( Dependent Class )
    Michael Churchill: Poor man wanna be rich / Rich man wanna be king / and a king ain’t satisfied with anything. As Mario Puzo said, the consolation of old age is power. But today it seems people get to old age with lots of wealth and no power. Perhaps they did not imagine well enough.

  • Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, Consumption

    SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, CONSUMPTION Sovereignty is the necessary objective. (Aristocratic Class) Liberty is the existential condition. (Bourgeoise Class) Freedom is the felt experience. (Working Class) Consumption is desired equivalent ( Dependent Class )
    Michael Churchill: Poor man wanna be rich / Rich man wanna be king / and a king ain’t satisfied with anything. As Mario Puzo said, the consolation of old age is power. But today it seems people get to old age with lots of wealth and no power. Perhaps they did not imagine well enough.