WE ARE MEN. WE LIMIT. WE RULE. WE MUST ACT LIKE IT.
RULE OR BE RULED.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 10:04:00 UTC
Theme: Sovereignty
-
WE ARE MEN. WE LIMIT. WE RULE. WE MUST ACT LIKE IT. RULE OR BE RULED
-
COMPARATIVE RELIGION: GROUP STRATEGIES 1) Aryan Expansion of sovereignty, domest
COMPARATIVE RELIGION: GROUP STRATEGIES
1) Aryan Expansion of sovereignty, domestication, and invention.(E)
2) (Reformed) Christian expansion of duty, trust, and production.(E)
3) Jewish expansion of separatism, deceit, and parasitism.(E/D)
4) Marxist expansion of rebellion, pseudoscience, and parasitism.(D)
5) Islamic expansion of submission, ignorance, and predation. (D)
(E: eugenic/domestication. D:dysgenic/un-domestication. E/D: internal eugenic and external dysgenic)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 06:37:00 UTC
-
first pages are the hardest thing to write….. The distributed dictatorship of
first pages are the hardest thing to write…..
The distributed dictatorship of the sovereign.
Humans are domesticatable animals like any other. We chant to one another that each man is valuable only so that we investigate the possibility of each rather than throw out the potential of a new-cooperator with the bathwater. And we continue the chant lest we also be discarded by those who might likewise judge us too quickly. But it is not true that all men’s lives are precious. It is not true that men’s lives are of value. It’s only that as long as they are not harmful, we may assume his life might be of value until he demonstrates he is harmful, or not valuable. But even this assumption rests only on the assumption that his cost in the interim is tolerable, or the cost of another is more tolerable.
The Reciprocity Equilibrium (lowest common denominator)
The wild animal man.
The prisoner-slave
The indentured slave
The potential human.
The human in training
The human.
The potential aristocracy.
The Aristocracy.
Market for survival (respect life and property)
Market for consumption (goods, svcs, information)
Market for reproduction (marriage)
Market for dispute resolution (the law – ind. judiciary)
Market for membership (freedom. defense of life, prop, comm.)
Market for commons (houses of govt for trades between the classes)
Market for rule (judge of last resort) (monarchs)
Market for polities (small states)
Market for Conflict (war)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 09:30:00 UTC
-
There is no better government than a universally distributed dictatorship. 😉
There is no better government than a universally distributed dictatorship. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 19:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798963918009835520
Reply addressees: @carson_gross @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798963441004265472
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798963441004265472
-
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider.
The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend.
This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 09:18:00 UTC
-
You are confused. This revolution isn’t about Donald. It’s about devolution of t
You are confused. This revolution isn’t about Donald. It’s about devolution of the government to the states.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 23:06:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798663375110578177
Reply addressees: @iamthehamish @SpeakerRyan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798663106972958720
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798663106972958720
-
Unarmed, lacking exit, with four hours of electricity, one day of water, and fiv
Unarmed, lacking exit, with four hours of electricity, one day of water, and five days of food. Who do you think is in control?
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 17:47:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798583291523792896
-
THE PURPOSE OF THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT? DIVISION OF SPOILS OF A CONQUE
THE PURPOSE OF THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT? DIVISION OF SPOILS OF A CONQUERED CONTINENT #tlot #tcot #conservative #newright #nrx https://t.co/REfp88kqEL
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 17:20:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798576476253724672
-
Intellectual History In A Nutshell
0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY. COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS. (corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law)
2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS (corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law) 3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST. (corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law) WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA? -
Intellectual History In A Nutshell
0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY. COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS. (corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law)
2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS (corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law) 3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST. (corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law) WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA?