Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • I don’t place any weight in ‘popular’ anything. I am not a supporter of democrac

    I don’t place any weight in ‘popular’ anything. I am not a supporter of democracy whatsoever, unless we mean empirical (economic) democracy. Opinion without warranty (skin in the game) is just self reporting of virtue signals, not demonstrated preference – which always differs substantially.

    I only care if statements are TRUE and open to juridical prosecution and defense, so that the false and parasitic can be suppressed.

    This DIFFERENCE is what separates :

    1) Prophets, Priests, Literature, Intellectuals, Academics, Politicians, and well intentioned fools (social ambitions) (***reported preference***) (GOSSIP)

    from:

    2) Financiers, Investors, Entrepreneurs, (commercial ambitions – demonstrated preference)(REMUNERATION)

    from:

    3) Physical scientists, generals, and jurists,. (truth ambitions – decidability) in matters of dispute. (FORCE)

    If you want a priest go find one. If you want opportunities go find them I’m a not a priest. I don’t care what you want. you can have whatever you can obtain morally – by reciprocity that does not cause me and mine to bear the cost of deciding a conflict, performing restitution, punishment, removal, or murder.

    I have a difficult job. Engineering. prophets and intellectuals have an easier job: bullshitting, coercing, lying.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Sovereign Men

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Cult of Non-Submission

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 10:48:00 UTC

  • Aristocratic Sovereignty, Burgher Liberty, Craftsman’s Freedom, Mother’s Subsidy

    Aristocratic Sovereignty, Burgher Liberty, Craftsman’s Freedom, Mother’s Subsidy.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 10:20:00 UTC

  • After natural law, a hierarchical militia is the most important institution for

    After natural law, a hierarchical militia is the most important institution for the construction of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 10:20:00 UTC

  • The west differs from the rest because of sovereignty born of martial epistemolo

    The west differs from the rest because of sovereignty born of martial epistemology: deflationary, testimonial, truth

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 10:19:00 UTC

  • There are four classes of problems we must deal with 1) what is a solution to th

    There are four classes of problems we must deal with

    1) what is a solution to the cosmopolitan war against the aristocratic west. I think I know that solution. And how do we defend it? That is the intellectual class problem.

    2) what is the plan of transition to that solution – this is the educated class problem.

    3) what is the means of raising the cost of the status quo – this is the working and underclass problem.

    4) how do we organize communication, control, and command of a revolution.

    My opinion is that I have been testing how far down I can move the message. And I an move the message to the middle class conservative majority I think, but the ACTIVIST minority we are dealing with is decidedly from the lower an lower working classes.

    So the question right now is where to put the effort. Honestly I could take six of us right now and debate any intellectual group on earth with very little pep and we would destroy them.

    I know enough about the constitutional demands to finish my last draft of them. Those are the demands.

    Trump is going to give us an opportunity for transition. The alt groups have been working tightly enoght that command and control are in place.

    The next step is to start feeding them strategy and tactics – which they don’t have anything going at all.

    Since this framework is actionable then it should be possible to drive it in the absence of other possible strategies.

    but that said I need to cut the discourse with the idiots and trolls and see if I can get otherse to take them on. First thing I’m doing is deleting all post that come through that are stuipid. becasue I feel it wastes my time.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 18:34:00 UTC

  • YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR (read this or remain stupid) —“Curt,

    YES FASCISM IS AN EXCEPTIONAL TOOL OF WAR

    (read this or remain stupid)

    —“Curt, would you still say fascism possesses a useful albeit temporary function?”—Robert Harris Scott Hayes

    Fascism has an EXCEPTIONAL short term function. It is a means of marshaling every resource in a nation for war on all fronts: military, trade, economic, financial, cultural, religious and informational.

    But it’s as costly as war over the long term. It is a means of warfare. Just as an army is an authoritarian means of organizing a people for physical war, and investing in certain commercial sectors is a means of organizing people for trade and economic war, and organizing credit for financial war….. Fascism allows us even to organize INFORMATION for the purpose of warfare. And that is what the Fascist generation did.

    War is war.

    But we do not fight the last battle just because we understand the tactic. Today we have a different tactic. We have a very very very fragile civilization that has been at war for a century or more with the cosmopolitan financial vision of managing the world for their benefit rather than each nation using financial, legal, cultural, and informational institutions to advance each nation WITHOUT exporting capital to others – by PREVENTING the parasitism of the cosmopolitan order we live under.

    Fascism isn’t necessary because fascism is DISCRETIONARY. We can do the SAME THING without putting a dictator in charge. We can simply starve out the other side by cutting off their means of funding.

    1) direct redistribution of fiat liquidity to citizens.

    2) demand for warranty of due diligence upon truthfulness (testimonialism) for all speech of all forms in the commons.

    3) revocation of the copyright and institution of involuntary creative commons.

    4) require sponsorship and full warranty of all costs for any immigrant, and rolling back the 64 immigration act, as well as the 14th and all related judgements.

    5) addition of voluntary and involuntary disassociation without limit.

    I can lengthen this list but it is unnecessary. The first three will end globalism, the academy, the media, the entertainment business, and vague statements from the politicians in short order.

    Whether you understand these things or not, they will destroy the cosmopolitan attack on western civlization in months.

    Because they may shame us and harm our status and employability. But we will prosecute, judge, and hang them.

    Dead people can’t propagandize and lie.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 17:40:00 UTC

  • AS A SOVEREIGN-IST I’M AN EGALITARIAN (merit) NOT AN EQUALITARIAN (without merit

    AS A SOVEREIGN-IST I’M AN EGALITARIAN (merit) NOT AN EQUALITARIAN (without merit)

    —“Classism is just as exclusionary as racism and sexism.”—Fredrick George Welfare

    And? so what? I didn’t say I’m not exclusionary, I said I’m a eugenicist – because it is the only criteria of decidability that is logical at the epistemological limits of perception.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 17:33:00 UTC

  • THIS IS WHAT I MEAN —“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said he hoped the

    THIS IS WHAT I MEAN

    —“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said he hoped the world “will choose a democratic world order — a post-West one — in which each country is defined by its sovereignty.””—

    OMG. How can people like Lavrov open their mouths like that? You mean, like UKRAINE’S sovereignty? Like every country russia has threatened in the past three years with loss of sovereignty?

    I mean, we have profoundly stupid ordinary people in positions of political power. That’s the curse of america. But Lavrov isn’t a profoundly stupid person. He’s just a liar.

    What he means is, that Russia wants out of the postwar treaty on Human Rights. (property rights).

    Which means RUSSIA WANTS OUT ON NATURAL LAW.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 14:37:00 UTC

  • ***When all men are sovereign in fact, we will have achieved the goal of western

    ***When all men are sovereign in fact, we will have achieved the goal of western civilization: a distributed dictatorship of peers.***

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 08:28:00 UTC

  • LOOK AT WHAT OUR PEOPLE CAN DO!!!! —“Sovereign men make a market for commons p

    LOOK AT WHAT OUR PEOPLE CAN DO!!!!

    —“Sovereign men make a market for commons possible by enforcing natural law. They allow non-sovereign men (i.e. those men that can’t pay the cost of insuring other sovereigns) to participate in the market for goods and commons, as long as they (non-sovereigns) limit their transactions to productive, fully warrantied, reciprocal transfers that produce no negative externalities. We call this allowance LIBERTY. It is made possible by the construction of the commons we call RULE OF LAW, which is paid for by the federated sovereigns, i.e. militia, judges, and the insurer of last resort: king.”— A Sock.

    Can you imagine that argument three years ago? whoo hooo!!!!

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-16 16:08:00 UTC