October 28th, 2018 10:19 AM THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT NECESSARY AND WHY (important concepts) [T]he form of government necessary for a people depends upon their demographic distribution, homogeneity, and the size of the middle class, because the middle class generates demand for rule of law, and the state generates demand for income from the wealth the middle class generates. So in the competition between rule of law and rule by man, demand is driven by conditions. This market is created by the competition for profits by the middle classes and their employees vs rents by the state and their dependents, with the principle difference being that the state can more easily concentrate startup capital and market advantage for heavy capital industries at the cost of corruption – and while the private sector cannot so easily produce the capital and market advantage through trade policy, the private sector can better utilize that capital and suppress state corruption since market competition suppresses rents. For historical reasons (geography, militia order, and ‘competitive’ bipartite manorialism), the west evolved cross-family corporations rather than intra-family clans, and as such superior trust, superior ability to produce commons because of it, and as such superior ability to generate large scale private sector organizations with greater innovation and returns on capital. Just as social orders became anchored (religion) during the age of transformation (the restoration after the bronze age collapse) societies became anchored during the industrial transformation after the Abrahamic Collapse (judaism,christianity,islam: the semitic – turkic invasion). Fukuyama attributed the success of european bureaucracy to its development prior to democracy. Because, despite his stated positions, his analysis favors the sino tradition of monolithic bureaucracy. Cheers.
Theme: Sovereignty
-
CONTINENTALISM, NATIONALISM, STATE CAPITALISM. One world government, monopoly, a
CONTINENTALISM, NATIONALISM, STATE CAPITALISM.
One world government, monopoly, authoritarian communism vs continentalism, nationalism, state capitalism. Why is that a difficult choice, versus empires or one-empire of world government?
India for Indians, Europa-America-Australia for Europeans, “Semitica” for Semites, Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, South America for South Americans and Amerindians, Pacifica for Pacificans.
Why this arrangement under many nation states is other than optimum is extremely difficult to understand.
We could all build walls and be at peace with one another. Good fences and good walls make good neighbors.
There is no ‘human right’ to access the civilization of European people. Our ancestors worked very hard to eliminate the ‘familialism and tribalism’ of the other civilizations. Only the Europeans (Atlantic-Germanic-Slavs), and the East Asians Han-Korean-Japanese) have achieved it. And only the hindus have produced as ‘kind’ a social order despite the burden of their demographics. The chinese have chip on their shoulder due to the century of embarrassment. The africans need nothing but time and defense against the horrors of islam. and all of us need defense against the horrors of Semitica – expansionary islamism. Only the west is ‘naive’ and trusting (Foolish) enough not to defend herself from conquest.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 09:24:00 UTC
-
Democracy only exists if men let it exist. Men decide. They always have. They al
Democracy only exists if men let it exist. Men decide. They always have. They always will. 6% of the population is hard right. that’s 10% of the european population. That’s 30M people,who possess 80% of the weapons. Against a Military of 2m that must also defend world trade.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 18:40:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055891944252026880
Reply addressees: @1963Kelli @washingtonpost
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055883985073582081
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055883985073582081
-
“Those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.” I silly little quote that expresse
“Those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.” I silly little quote that expresses a logical necessity and empirical fact. Revolution Comes. There is no longer need to tolerate our replacement.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 18:32:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055889892859957249
Reply addressees: @1963Kelli @washingtonpost
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055888022439309312
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055888022439309312
-
Of course it is. Which was Mao’s objective: to prevent separation of the north a
Of course it is. Which was Mao’s objective: to prevent separation of the north and south and the devolution of the chinese empire into states. That doesn’t explain why china is circumventing Bretton Woods, and exerting power over shipping lanes when the USA pays for it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 19:07:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055536264995393536
Reply addressees: @catoletters @amconmag
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535572599504896
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535572599504896
-
THE CHINESE MILITARY STRATEGY, (as popularized by no less than Kissinger) is to
THE CHINESE MILITARY STRATEGY, (as popularized by no less than Kissinger) is to follow Sun Tsu’s advice, and incrementally accumulate power under peaceful pretense until the enemy can be easily destroyed, colonized, or ignored. This is why no Chinese words have meaning.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 18:59:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055534403823132672
Reply addressees: @amconmag @catoletters
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055524391675523072
IN REPLY TO:
@amconmag
“The first freight train from China arrived in Spain in December 2014, and in January 2017 a freight train from China made the journey to London in 18 days.” The six trillion we blew in the Middle East could have built the U.S. equivalent. https://t.co/XmQ7K6ao99
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055524391675523072
-
USA-Mexico Like Russia-Ukraine-Caucuses, China-Tibet, Iraq-Kuwait Is a Pandora’s Box
October 25th, 2018 10:39 AM USA-MEXICO LIKE RUSSIA-UKRAINE-CAUCUSES, CHINA-TIBET, IRAQ-KUWAIT IS A PANDORA’S BOX
—“Does Mexico even have a claim to sovereignty when cartels do as they please?”– Micah Pezdirtz
[W]ell, IMO this is the problem: we can’t do this without ourselves breaking the postwar consensus. I mean. We do this then russian and china do this, and iran does this and we eventually have world war three MAYBE, unless we agree with russia and china first on how to manage our spheres. The postwar consensus is over. But if WE are its defenders (police) and WE do it, then it’s really over and then the entire purpose of the postwar consensus – preventing another world war – is finished. IN my opinion graceful transition to balance of powers is going to happen and we are committing suicide by resisting it.
-
USA-Mexico Like Russia-Ukraine-Caucuses, China-Tibet, Iraq-Kuwait Is a Pandora’s Box
October 25th, 2018 10:39 AM USA-MEXICO LIKE RUSSIA-UKRAINE-CAUCUSES, CHINA-TIBET, IRAQ-KUWAIT IS A PANDORA’S BOX
—“Does Mexico even have a claim to sovereignty when cartels do as they please?”– Micah Pezdirtz
[W]ell, IMO this is the problem: we can’t do this without ourselves breaking the postwar consensus. I mean. We do this then russian and china do this, and iran does this and we eventually have world war three MAYBE, unless we agree with russia and china first on how to manage our spheres. The postwar consensus is over. But if WE are its defenders (police) and WE do it, then it’s really over and then the entire purpose of the postwar consensus – preventing another world war – is finished. IN my opinion graceful transition to balance of powers is going to happen and we are committing suicide by resisting it.
-
I always thought that the “Democratic” ideal confused people. A society survives
I always thought that the “Democratic” ideal confused people. A society survives by the smallest number of men willing and able to engage in civil war to end it.Usually takes only 1-3% of the male population. There are 500% more than necessary. (And they have 80% of the weapons.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 18:30:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055526983222857728
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055519904668020736
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
USA: 6% HARD RIGHT, 8% HARD LEFT? Well, that means that 10% of the ethnically european population is hard right. That’s more than either the christianization of rome 9%, or the nazis in germany 7% or the Bolsheviks in Russia ~3%.
@GlennF @FortuneMagazine
http://fortune.com/2018/10/22/far-right-americans-just-six-person-study-says/Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1055519904668020736
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
USA: 6% HARD RIGHT, 8% HARD LEFT? Well, that means that 10% of the ethnically european population is hard right. That’s more than either the christianization of rome 9%, or the nazis in germany 7% or the Bolsheviks in Russia ~3%.
@GlennF @FortuneMagazine
https://t.co/wXQFlBAVVEOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1055519904668020736
-
CHINESE MILITARY STRATEGY, (as popularized by no less than Kissinger) is to foll
https://t.co/XmQ7K6ao99THE CHINESE MILITARY STRATEGY, (as popularized by no less than Kissinger) is to follow Sun Tsu’s advice, and incrementally accumulate power under peaceful pretense until the enemy can be easily destroyed, colonized, or ignored. This is why no Chinese words have meaning.
https://t.co/XmQ7K6ao99
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 15:00:00 UTC