Oct 20, 2019, 1:37 PM
The military is the #1 demographic in support of their state seceding from the union ~Red State Secession
(Via John Mark)
Theme: Sovereignty
-
Oct 20, 2019, 1:37 PM The military is the #1 demographic in support of their sta
-
Oct 20, 2019, 1:37 PM The military is the #1 demographic in support of their sta
Oct 20, 2019, 1:37 PM
The military is the #1 demographic in support of their state seceding from the union ~Red State Secession
(Via John Mark)
-
P Is a Reform on The Scale of The Roman Reforms.
—“What about the Military under P?”–
The P constitution preserves the federal military system for the simple reasons that (a) we need to prevent hostiles taking territory on this continent (b) military is the only organization the benefits tremendously from scale. We also push forward military reforms like the light infantry proposal, limiting constraints on rules of engagement, limiting punishments for lapses of judgement during conflict; fully separating the Marines, cultural remasculinization, competitive pay, mixing civilian contract military service personnel,and detaching compensation from rank, restoring military R&D, skipping a generation and moving out of policing and into pure defense of our citizens anywhere in the world, trade route, territorial, population and asset defense, and giving the military full license so that they are rarely used, but if they are, they are terrifying. In addition the military gets a ‘house’ in congress and all in all restores the state-military-industrial complex over the state-academy-media complex. Honestly it’s very hard for the military to disagree with our proposal. P is a reform on the scale of the roman reforms.
-
P Is a Reform on The Scale of The Roman Reforms.
—“What about the Military under P?”–
The P constitution preserves the federal military system for the simple reasons that (a) we need to prevent hostiles taking territory on this continent (b) military is the only organization the benefits tremendously from scale. We also push forward military reforms like the light infantry proposal, limiting constraints on rules of engagement, limiting punishments for lapses of judgement during conflict; fully separating the Marines, cultural remasculinization, competitive pay, mixing civilian contract military service personnel,and detaching compensation from rank, restoring military R&D, skipping a generation and moving out of policing and into pure defense of our citizens anywhere in the world, trade route, territorial, population and asset defense, and giving the military full license so that they are rarely used, but if they are, they are terrifying. In addition the military gets a ‘house’ in congress and all in all restores the state-military-industrial complex over the state-academy-media complex. Honestly it’s very hard for the military to disagree with our proposal. P is a reform on the scale of the roman reforms.
-
American Constitutional History – and Its Future
- IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW –
- THE FIRST SEMITIC DARK AGE –
- THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE –
THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE 1) The European IE Customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected Kings. 2) The proto germanic customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings THE MEDITERRANEAN AGE 3) The Greek customary Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings. 4) The Roman Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. FALL OF ROME AND END OF MEDITERRANEAN TRADE 5) The Germanic Continental Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and inherited Monarchy. 6) Germanic Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. 7) The Anglo Saxon Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – (Families) THE NORMAN CONQUEST: UNIFICATION INTO ENGLISH COMMON LAW 8) ~1066 – Attempted unification of differences in anglo saxon law, and norman ‘privilege’. Primarily concerned with the conflcit between customary (folk) law and privilege. 9) THE NOBILITY’S VETO – THE MAGNA CARTA RESTORATION OF RIGHTS ~1215 – Magna Carta 1215. Restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR – THE RESTORATION OF RIGHTS 1) ~1664 – The English Common Law and the British Constitution, restoring sovereignty, reciprocity THE AMERICAN WAR OF SECESSION 2) ~1776 – The Declaration, The Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation 3) ~1789 – The Constitution, and Bill of RIghts – restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – but failing to ARTICULATE them. THE FIRST (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1812 – The North’s Attempted Secession over the war of 1812 with England. THE SECOND (MAJOR) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1865- The Constitution of Oppression of the Southern States over the south’s secession and control of westward expansion. THE THIRD (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 5) ~1933 – The Left’s Attempt At Conquest, imitating the semitic conquest of Russia, by FDR. THE FOURTH AMERICAN CIVIL WAR (SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE) 6) ~1965 – The Constitution of Oppression of Ethnic Europeans by the reversal of the demand for integration into the rule of law, christian ethics, market meritocracy, and the self sufficiency of the absolute nuclear family – and the undermining of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy -THE RESTORATION- THE FIFTH CIVIL WAR (THE RESTORATION) 7) ~2020 – The Restoration of the Constitution Natural Law, and the Retaliation against the Second Attempt At Destruction of Western Civilization – by restoration of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.
-
American Constitutional History – and Its Future
- IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW –
- THE FIRST SEMITIC DARK AGE –
- THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE –
THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE 1) The European IE Customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected Kings. 2) The proto germanic customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings THE MEDITERRANEAN AGE 3) The Greek customary Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings. 4) The Roman Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. FALL OF ROME AND END OF MEDITERRANEAN TRADE 5) The Germanic Continental Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and inherited Monarchy. 6) Germanic Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. 7) The Anglo Saxon Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – (Families) THE NORMAN CONQUEST: UNIFICATION INTO ENGLISH COMMON LAW 8) ~1066 – Attempted unification of differences in anglo saxon law, and norman ‘privilege’. Primarily concerned with the conflcit between customary (folk) law and privilege. 9) THE NOBILITY’S VETO – THE MAGNA CARTA RESTORATION OF RIGHTS ~1215 – Magna Carta 1215. Restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR – THE RESTORATION OF RIGHTS 1) ~1664 – The English Common Law and the British Constitution, restoring sovereignty, reciprocity THE AMERICAN WAR OF SECESSION 2) ~1776 – The Declaration, The Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation 3) ~1789 – The Constitution, and Bill of RIghts – restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – but failing to ARTICULATE them. THE FIRST (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1812 – The North’s Attempted Secession over the war of 1812 with England. THE SECOND (MAJOR) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1865- The Constitution of Oppression of the Southern States over the south’s secession and control of westward expansion. THE THIRD (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 5) ~1933 – The Left’s Attempt At Conquest, imitating the semitic conquest of Russia, by FDR. THE FOURTH AMERICAN CIVIL WAR (SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE) 6) ~1965 – The Constitution of Oppression of Ethnic Europeans by the reversal of the demand for integration into the rule of law, christian ethics, market meritocracy, and the self sufficiency of the absolute nuclear family – and the undermining of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy -THE RESTORATION- THE FIFTH CIVIL WAR (THE RESTORATION) 7) ~2020 – The Restoration of the Constitution Natural Law, and the Retaliation against the Second Attempt At Destruction of Western Civilization – by restoration of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.
-
What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei
What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/what-if-any-people-have-not-resisted-our-truth-telling-reciprocity-and-sovereignty/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 15:01:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267471240375218176
-
What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei
What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://t.co/rJrwEmmoYN
-
What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?
WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.
-
What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?
WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.