Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • ALL THIS GRAPH SHOWS IS THAT WOMEN TAKE IDIOT DEGREES IN SOCiAL SCIENCE IN LARGE

    ALL THIS GRAPH SHOWS IS THAT WOMEN TAKE IDIOT DEGREES IN SOCiAL SCIENCE IN LARGE NUMBERS.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:02:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796458058708897799

    Reply addressees: @KendallRaeOnYT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796397958275145728

    IN REPLY TO:

    @KendallRaeOnYT

    The majority of Trump voters were uneducated older white men. Numbers don’t lie. #NotMyPresident https://t.co/qIqZPgObPY

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796397958275145728

  • (a) single young women express caretaker instinct externally if childless. (b) m

    (a) single young women express caretaker instinct externally if childless. (b) minorities seek rents and privs

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 19:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796432960014663680

    Reply addressees: @ciberjosefina @CShockTroops

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796429809287106560

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ciberjosefina

    @CShockTroops @curtdoolittle source?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796429809287106560

  • Evidence of the failure of the 19th Amendment. A female without a brood to absor

    Evidence of the failure of the 19th Amendment. A female without a brood to absorb her impulses, yet able to vote is a threat to the west. https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/796359749352701952

  • of the failure of the 19th Amendment. A female without a brood to absorb her imp

    https://t.co/EcpKbUCBvzEvidence of the failure of the 19th Amendment. A female without a brood to absorb her impulses, yet able to vote is a threat to the west.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 12:23:00 UTC

  • THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW

    THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW, AND INSTITUTIONS, TO AMELIORATE THE SUICIDAL URGES OF WOMEN.

    There are good and bad people in every clan, tribe, and race. Some have just been better that others at eliminating different kinds of bad.

    Whites have notably been TERRIBLE at eliminating the bad trait of FEMALE SOLIPSISM or developing laws to limit its damage, before granting women the franchise with which to express their need to care for children upon non-kin and competitors.

    Women, demonstrably, and empirically, are mentally unable to vote unless married with children, so that their ‘urges’ are occupied at home, and not expressed as inappropriate urges in the commons.

    Men have these urges: sex, violence, and risk. But we have spent millennia, constraining the danger of those urges through domestication and institutional evolution.

    We have not spent the same time constraining women. And it’s more than obvious that we must do so. Since their urges, expressed in the voting booth, direct their nest and nurture instincts outside of the home, and to provide access, comfort, and resources to what are evidentially our competitors and enemies.

    WE BLAME THE COMPETITOR NOT OUR WOMEN, AND NOT OURSELVES.

    Is it true that the cosmopolitan jews, in all their forms, but in particular, their new religion of Cultural Marxism and the Scripture of Critical Theory, and the Fictitious History of Marxism, had found willing soil in our young, unmarried women? Yes. Is it true that the Academy, freshly licensed by Darwin’s defeat of the Church, but whose revolution in science limited the Academy’s market, seized upon this new intellectual product as a means of profiting from the postwar underclass, and newly enriched women,

    A woman over the age of 21 that does not have at least one child is a threat to civilization because she cannot control her urges for nesting, consumption, and the IRRESPONSIBLE satisfaction of her urges for caretaking by employing them against the interests of kin.

    That’s not an opinion but a statement of the empirical evidence of the experiments of the various societies in the 20th century.

    So there are many ways of controlling the impulses of women without children to harm the polity and our kin. The most obvious being to deprive them of the vote until they are able to manage their urges. Just as we deprive men of their ability to vote if they cannot manage their urges. The difference is only that men require physical restraint, and women require verbal and political restraint.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:33:00 UTC

  • Voted. Took an hour. Heavy turnout. Disproportionately female. Nice thick, paper

    Voted. Took an hour. Heavy turnout. Disproportionately female. Nice thick, paper ballots. Clear and readable.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 08:45:00 UTC

  • OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OU

    OF COURSE IT’S THE COSMOPOLITAN JEW’S FAULT FOR THE SECOND GREAT LIE, BUT ITS OUR FAULT FOR BEING OUT-GUNNED BY IT. ESPECIALLY BY THEIR ALLIANCE WITH OUR WOMEN AND PURITANS.

    There is blame for everyone in the enlightenment – perhaps the jews and French the most. As I say, don’t blame the innovator in warfare, blame those who are losign from not developing superior countermeasures because of underinvestment in weaponry.

    —“Ezra Pound had many clever ideas, but his faulting “Big Jew” was not one of them.”— Boris Miroslav Spacek

    He was correct that the cosmopolitans were the originators of the second ‘religious’ conquest of the west, this time by pseudoscience rather than by authoritarian mysticism.

    We have Aesop, Homer, Alexander, Aristotle, Aurelius, Machiavelli, Bacon, Locke, Smith, Hume, Jefferson, Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Menger, Nietzche, Hayek, and all those in between.

    But the cosmopolitans reacted to them with the Pseudoscientific Counter-Enlightenment: Boaz (anthropology), Freud (psychology), Marx (economics and sociology), Cantor(mathematical platonism), Mises (economic pseudoscience), Adorno/Frankfurt( anti-aristocratic aesthetics), Rand and Rothbard (anti-commons).

    And sold the pseudoscience to the female and underclass populace as a utopian scheme via the academy for profit, just as the mysticism was sold to the female and underclass via traveling preachers for profit: to rebel against the aristocracy that domesticated them out of ignorance, mysticism, tribalism, and poverty.

    So this is all merely a fact of history now, and the consequences of the first great lie: authoritarian mysticism, and the second great lie of critical pseudoscience are empirically observable as the destruction of common capital in all its forms.

    So no, he was not wrong.

    What he was wrong about, and what all subsequent generations have been wrong about, is that when one is confronted by an act of warfare wether by arms, by immigration(displacement), by economics, by conversion, or by information (falsehood), that one can be out-gunned-out-germed-out-steeled by immigration, economics, conversion, or informational propaganda as well as by force of arms.

    So that the failure to adapt to a new form of warfare is OUR FAULT, rather than the fault of the innovators of the new form of warfare.

    And this is not complicated.

    We have built western civilization into the FASTEST evolving civilization by the domestication of humans under our domain, through nothing more than the use of the common, natural, judge-discovered law, and the use of truth, empiricism, reason, arms and technology despite small numbers to do so. And we have dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of mysticism, ignorance, poverty, and starvation, and disease with those tools – and we profited from it. And there is no shame in that profiting.

    Compare the consequences of the use of western truth to domesticate man, and the consequences of the first reaction to aristocracy (scriptural religion), the second reaction to Aristotelian aristocracy (scriptural monotheism), and the third reaction to Baconian empiricism (pseudoscientific cosmopolitanism).

    Are jews responsible for the second and third great lies and the harm that they have done? Of course they are.

    Are we responsible for not yet advancing our law so that such lies are impossible to propagate through as aggressive punishment of that method of war and crime as every other method of war and crime?

    Yes, we are.

    So the jews are certainly to blame for much of the world’s reliance on the great lies, and the conflicts therefrom. But we are responsible for tolerating the great lies.

    The interesting question is… why are we tolerant of the great lies, either supernatural great lies, or pseudoscientific great lies?

    And why is it that the jews have learned to specialize in ‘the big lies’ as the Russians and Germans have so frequently observed?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 09:26:00 UTC

  • THE INCREASE IN MALE SUICIDE IS EVIDENCE OF WOMEN’S ABANDONMENT OF THE EXCHANGE

    THE INCREASE IN MALE SUICIDE IS EVIDENCE OF WOMEN’S ABANDONMENT OF THE EXCHANGE OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY. SO WHY NOT ABANDON THE EXCHANGE OF LIMITING OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR MARRIAGE?

    There is no reason to remove women from domesticated slavery if the consequence is their abandonment of the compromise of marriage, early calorie transfer, and late return. If we are to live late and uncared for seeking suicide in ever greater numbers so that women can expand their insatiable nesting urge, including the consumption of our millennia of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, normative, informational, and material capital, then there is no value in our release of them from slavery into the market for production.

    In other words, it is either marriage and family before individual, so that we equally benefit from the intertemporal demands of our biology, or we might as well just return women to domestic slavery.

    It’s not complicated. Marriage and reproductive constraint is a compromise. Break the exchange and we do not retain the redistributive benefits of female participation in the market men have made, but instead, we return to that prior era where the market is the domain of men, and women are once again herded for our purposes like all other animals.

    None of us gets what we want. We get only the best that is possible.

    Everyone in every civilization thinks their norms are a force of gravity. But the only force of gravity in human existence is ability to organize to use violence to obtain what we desire over that which others desire – in where there is no right, there is only what is possible. There is no property there is only possession.

    So we can either return to a world of voluntary exchanges from the extraction of resources from our most productive males, or we can return to the world in which our least productive males use violence to enslave and make use of that which they choose to.

    Civilizations are very fragile things.

    Men are not very smart – certainly not smarter than traditions they do not understand. And women seek to avoid that understanding in order to fulfill their urges, regardless of the cost to men.

    Civilization consists of forcing trades.

    if you abandon those trades, we return to uncivilized behavior: force.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of the West

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:34:00 UTC

  • “The current male suicide epidemic is better example of consequences of damage a

    —“The current male suicide epidemic is better example of consequences of damage accumulation on the part of men on behalf of women and children.”— Matej Lovrić

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • “Modern day feminism has nothing to do with equality. It is about putting women

    —“Modern day feminism has nothing to do with equality. It is about putting women above the other gender for (name your cliche) reason (s).”— Katie McCracken (via Andrew Amelang)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:20:00 UTC