Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • If impulse suppression, meritocracy, equal opportunity, and kin selection are th

    If impulse suppression, meritocracy, equal opportunity, and kin selection are the values of “white supremacy” why NOT be white supremacists?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 05:39:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892620858757394432

    Reply addressees: @LisaBloom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892568799798538240

    IN REPLY TO:

    @LisaBloom

    After discriminating against LGBTs, Muslims & immigrants, Trump wants DOJ civil rights lawyers to protect whites. https://t.co/6xikC7PLAR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/892568799798538240

  • MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women

    MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES

    Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women are far more scarce for men than men are for women.

    And 1/3 of men have little or little or no market value at all.

    More than half of women are not insignificantly crazy.

    For men, children and women are an investment, and without them your life will be shorter and the later parts of it far less pleasant if not sad. If you have to choose, have as many children as you can pay attention to. You can trade women. But you cannot trade children.

    It is easier for women to find work in the easy and clean jobs, and easier for men to find work in the hard and dirty jobs.

    It is easier for women to integrate into new social groups as they get older.

    It is far harder for men to integrate into social groups as they get older.

    It is hard for women to ‘get things done’ as they get older.

    It is hard for men to take care of themselves as they get older.

    We are desperately short of men’s monasteries, secular monasteries, and regimental barracks (monasteries) than we need to be. And those changes can only occur if we are able to employ right of disassociation (requiring very specific kinship ties for membership)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:58:00 UTC

  • THE LOGIC OF THE SH-T TEST: CONTINUOUS COMPOSURE AND USEFULNESS –“Women shit te

    THE LOGIC OF THE SH-T TEST: CONTINUOUS COMPOSURE AND USEFULNESS

    –“Women shit test to make sure they are holding themselves in high enough company – company that can take care of her in case sh-t hits the fan, or to sort out the snakes. The genetic urge to constantly test your companion for composure can be very beneficial but it can also unravel unfit mates. As long as the man can maintain his frame of mind during a shit test he will pass, but if he can spread his composure to the woman he can “win”. The shit tests never stop and as you spread your composure to the woman through constant interaction her feminine energies will incorporate your composure and move to a higher level, I believe this is the case with a guy who “saves a girl” while not investing in himself enough ultimately being passed and outliving his usefulness. To maintain your attractiveness to your mate you must always be useful and always maintain a higher level of composure than your mate, through self discipline and self improvement of the mind and body. Shit tests can destroy you but if you understand them they can lead you to being the best man possible.”— George Carvlin

    I say this a bit differently as: our job is to make women feel safe in whatever way they need to feel safe. Unfortunately we have not been raised to make women feel safe and women have been raised to pretend they do not need to feel safe. So women are crazy and men are frustrated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:45:00 UTC

  • “For a woman men are commodities. Only children are specialties.”—Francesco Pr

    —“For a woman men are commodities. Only children are specialties.”—Francesco Principi

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 13:06:00 UTC

  • RELIGION? HOW DO YOU KNOW (AS A HUMAN and MAN) – OR DO YOU JUST FEEL (AS AN ANIM

    RELIGION? HOW DO YOU KNOW (AS A HUMAN and MAN) – OR DO YOU JUST FEEL (AS AN ANIMAL or WOMAN)?

    What is the consequence of christianity vs the consequence of roman pagan festival, political law personal stoicism?

    Why do you think christianity contains “truths” rather than a strategy and tactics. And unless you know the different strategies and tactics, and how they map to the competitive evolutionary strategies of the groups that use them, then how do you know what you’re saying is true?

    I mean, what is the difference between the tragedy of achilles and the tragedy of jesus? You know, jesus’ tragedy was invented to undermine that of achilles – which was the ‘bible’ of the ancient world.

    Just as abrahamism was invented to destroy the persian, anatolian, greek aristocracy, jesus’ story was invented to destroy the persian, anatolian-byzantine, roman aristocracy. Just as marxist and postmodern abrahamism was invented to destroy the anglo-german aristocracy. It works the same way every time: rally the women and the underclass such that it affects the income of the middle class so that they threaten the upper class and destroy the civilization.

    How do you know that religion does what you say it does? What is the difference between good and true religion and bad and false religion?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 11:11:00 UTC

  • THE ‘SH-T TEST’ theory of female behavior has legs. In fact, it might be the mos

    THE ‘SH-T TEST’ theory of female behavior has legs. In fact, it might be the most important theory of female behavior – ever.

    Seriously. As a search algorithm for a life form with a valuable commodity (vagina), it’s fantastic. Women Sh-t Test each other too you know. Constantly. And that’s why women have so few close friends compared to men.

    It’s just cheaper to Sh-t Test than any other available strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 08:30:00 UTC

  • CRITICIZING MATERIALISM: FOR GOOD OR BAD REASONS? Well, you know, criticizing ma

    CRITICIZING MATERIALISM: FOR GOOD OR BAD REASONS?

    Well, you know, criticizing materialism as a substitute for the familial (reproduction) is logical. For the social, likely. For the religious and supernatural, nonsense. In fact, there is a high correlation between social rejection and religiosity for precisely those reasons. So when I hear people want ‘traditionalism’ hear they are socially incompetent and want a way to enter the dream state in public – the ultimate selfishness – spiritual masturbation. They are generating demand for a bad. When I hear people talk about loneliness, loss of the civil society, or being unfulfilled by material goods, I hear that they long for social participation, or the safety of family and clan, then they are demonstrating demand for a ‘good’. Participatory sport, participatory debate, participatory theatre, participatory sacrifice (donation to the commons) and personal commune with the gods, with emphasis on ritual assist in social trust and bonding.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 07:27:00 UTC

  • (You say ‘eugenics’ like it’s a bad thing, and imply dysgenics is a good thing.)

    (You say ‘eugenics’ like it’s a bad thing, and imply dysgenics is a good thing.)

    Anyway,

    1) personality traits evolved as an intersection between gender strategy and prey drive. The prey drive consists of five physical systems. These systems are altered by gender and neotonic selection (success at extending immaturity).

    2) The personality traits which most influence lifetime success are intelligence, industriousness, and conscientiousness.

    3) Intelligence is categorizable a personality trait, appears to be the most important trait, appears to be largely a function of neoteny, size, and verbal ability.

    4) It’s controversial but I’ve talked to Lynn about it, and he’s adamant that we’ve lost 15pts of aggregate IQ in the past century, even if we’ve seen flynn effects from (a) ending developmental nutrition problems, and (b) the power of training in general (scientific) rules vs specific case rules. World IQ is dropping precipitously.

    5) the most important feature that determines the standard of living (and political stabiity) of a polity is IQ.

    Net is, 20th c was a disaster.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 21:37:00 UTC

  • “Lets face it, underclass fathers dont stick around, and are not monogamous gene

    —“Lets face it, underclass fathers dont stick around, and are not monogamous generally, and not reliably employed so they require maintenance from the females of the species for lodging. The female is less violent and given access to state resources and benefits. The financial capacity of the community is dictated externally and distributed through underclass females so the selection criteria for mating is not determined by a mate’s economic value but by other criteria, education not one of them.”— anon

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 10:24:00 UTC

  • Been done. UNLV. By Hoppe illustrating (true) time preference difference between

    Been done. UNLV. By Hoppe illustrating (true) time preference difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals. Same argument 20yrs. Then…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 13:58:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888760170318266368

    Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/887389691292549120

    IN REPLY TO:

    @AlanLevinovitz

    Free speech thought experiment:

    A prof uses ugly students in her class to illustrate points abt physical unattractiveness. 1/

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/887389691292549120