Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • GENDER STUDIES GRADUATE DEMONSTRATES THE POWER OF SHOUTING The consequence of Wh

    GENDER STUDIES GRADUATE DEMONSTRATES THE POWER OF SHOUTING

    The consequence of White Female privilege – the belief that shouting, shaming, and rallying isn’t limited by the good will of the strong.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 09:01:00 UTC

  • DEVELOPING AGENCY: THE SEARCH FOR PEAK HUMAN We probably reached peak physical h

    DEVELOPING AGENCY: THE SEARCH FOR PEAK HUMAN

    We probably reached peak physical human prior to the selection pressures of agrarianism.

    We probably reached peak domesticated human in northern europe during the late medieval period. If not by the corded ware era (more likely).

    We reached peak natural animal domestication a long time ago.

    We domesticated the last natural plants nearly two hundred years ago.

    We probably reached peak natural territorial capital by the early 20th century.

    We probably reached peak mobilization of natural human capital in the west by the 1950’s.

    We probably have not reached peak cooperative (economic) technology as such – our monetary systems are lagging. We can improve cooperation in commerce.

    We certainly have not reached peak political technology – our political systems are lagging. We can improve cooperation in the commons.

    We seem to have reached not reached peak information distribution – the central problem being that the market has not curated the inventory of human knowledge (Brought it into scientific prose) yet.

    To ‘peak’ we can largely only remove bads, rather than create goods. Meaning that all advancement will be in improving human capital itself.

    The primary means of improving human capital is reduction of the unproductive (under) classes.

    The secondary means of improving human capital is genetic modification.

    I suspect that I understand the limits of improving human information access and processing and that will

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 08:17:00 UTC

  • POSTMODERN TECHNIQUE When I say that all (((abrahamists))) are using the female

    POSTMODERN TECHNIQUE

    When I say that all (((abrahamists))) are using the female reproductive strategy, I mean that the female weapon of influence is gossip, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, deceit, and rallying (undermining), and that postmodernism seeks to destroy reason as a means of decidability leaving only intuition (feelings) as decidability, therefore leaving only individuals ( equality ) as a means of decidability, therefore leaving only communism (authoritarianism) as a means of political decidability.

    And when I say that the cycle of history is between military conquest by violence, bourgeoise civilization by trade, and slave+women conquest of civilization by undermining (creating weakness) so that outsiders can merely replace their betters with a new set of betters, I mean that it is a cyclical battle between aristocratic order by truth, bourgeois wealthy by pragmatic exchange, and underclass utopianism by gossip, undermining, falsehood, and theft.

    Women and the weak are always trying to recreate the herd and men and the powerful are always trying to recreate the pack. The reason being obvious: the distribution of resources for larger numbers and dysgenic stagnation giving best opportunity for bad genes, and the concentration of resources for small numbers and eugenic evolution giving best opportunity for good genes.

    What we should take away from the french and german works of philosophy is that they resisted the enlightenment with every fiber in them, and sought to replace the structures of power: the monarchies and the church.

    But they did not want truth if it meant restoration of hierarchy – and truth will always restore hierarchy, because our talents and abilities and therefore our value to one another is hierarchical.

    And the attempt to resist that hierarchy can only be achieved through lying about it, and stealing enough that the dominance hierarchy is not visible – or better yet, that the dominance hierarchy is female:he who takes and redistributes most, rather than male: he who produces most.

    Because in the end, we measure all as gains to our reproductive strategy. And we cannot do otherwise.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 07:44:00 UTC

  • Men see the world as objects. Seriously. It’s that simple. If you can’t eat it,

    Men see the world as objects. Seriously. It’s that simple. If you can’t eat it, kill it, fight it, f–k it, or use it to do one of the above, it doesn’t exist.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 18:31:00 UTC

  • Um. I know that if you are sensitive to the gender issue, it’s hard to see my un

    Um. I know that if you are sensitive to the gender issue, it’s hard to see my underlying strategy, but I’m saying we all MUST trade. Because if we don’t trade the option is women prey upon men, or men prey upon women. In that choice, men will always prey upon women.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 16:52:00 UTC

  • Gender……….. Masculine…. Ascendent……Feminine ========================

    Gender……….. Masculine…. Ascendent……Feminine

    ========================================

    Strategy……… Assets………. Income………. Expenses

    Reproduction .Eugenic……. Pragmatic……. Dysgenic

    Morality………. Loyalty……… Freedom………. Care-Taking

    Coercion…….. Violence……. Remuneration..Gossip(Ral|y)

    Property ……. Hierarchical.. Individual………Collective

    Politics ………..Authoritarian. Libertarian……Socialist

    Ability…………. Strength……..Cunning ……….Sex(Affection)

    ========================================

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 19:02:00 UTC

  • LITERATURE *IS* THE LITERATURE OF THE FEMININE: EXPERIENCE —“What would consti

    LITERATURE *IS* THE LITERATURE OF THE FEMININE: EXPERIENCE

    —“What would constitute a reformed literature of the feminine?”—Ben Smith

    Ordinary literature: the novel: the literature of experience. the literature of men is action.–Curt Doolittle

    ( —-“Fits with your idea that men and women should not discuss true vs false but rather possible vs not possible.”—Michael Churchill )

    MEN ACT.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 13:39:00 UTC

  • THE LITERATURE OF THE FEMININE vs. THE MASCULINE (I am gonna get in *big* troubl

    THE LITERATURE OF THE FEMININE vs. THE MASCULINE

    (I am gonna get in *big* trouble for this, but it’s true.)

    The Literature of the Feminine and the Effeminate: (Speech)

    1 -Abrahamism(Judaism > Christianity > Islam) >

    2 -Marxism ( Socialism > Libertarianism > Neo-Conservatism ) >

    3 -Postmodernism( Feminism > Secular Humanism > Alt-Right)

    The Literature of the Masculine: (Action)

    1 – Sovereignty > Law > Science > Technology > Economics > War.

    (Ancient Romans, Monarchists, Tories, Fascists, The New Right)

    (Not gonna defeat that. Not gonna happen.)

    (OMG, LET THE FLAME WARS START)

    (h/t: Ayelam)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 10:08:00 UTC

  • GENDER (PHYSICAL), SEXUAL DRIVE(DEVELOPMENTAL), IDENTITY( PSYCHOLOGICAL) Gender

    GENDER (PHYSICAL), SEXUAL DRIVE(DEVELOPMENTAL), IDENTITY( PSYCHOLOGICAL)

    Gender drives (biases) are produced *developmentally*: in utero, during early development and through our transformative eras.

    Sexual plasticity varies more in females than in males because females use attention, affection, and sex with the same utility as men use loyalty, argument, and physical transformation.

    The process of gender development just like the process of brain development, is ‘fragile’, in that one cannot improve it but many things can impede it.

    This process evolved to require both environmental(training) and physical factors.

    The desocialization process of modernity, the decline in male influence in the maturation(training) process, and the trauma of the school vs home environment, and the loss of mother from the home, has had a substantial impact on the the developmental process.

    As far as I know 1) homosexuality is determined in-utero, and 2) all ‘body identity’ or ‘gender identity’ ‘questions’ are defects in developmental training.

    It is not clear that , however in large scale it affects trust-capital, normative capital, and calculability (organizational ability). as well as political decidability.

    Why? *because the individual is irrelevant compared to the family, and because the family produces generations of increasingly superior inferior individuals, the consequences of which are superior or inferior competitive ability against other groups, against nature, against the universe.*

    As far as I know, homosexuality cannot be ‘cured’ (and there is some evidence that a small amount of homosexuality in a population is a good thing) but it can be prevented as can many birth defects. As far as I know, gender identity questions are due to environmental-chemical, environmental-maladaption, and these are largely the result of problems of psychological development.

    So

    1) gender is genetically determined period.

    2) sexual attraction is both genetic and in-utero-developmental.

    3) Body image/identity (marketing one’s utility) problems are psychological problems that are repairable, but should not arise in the first place if we are sufficiently socialized.

    The desperate need for identity when most people have no means of obtaining status signals, has encouraged doubling down on immaturity rather than devoting effort to maturity during the formative years.

    The easiest solution to this problem is to return to gender separated schools (I went to a private boys school and my sisters to a private girls school, and I stayed in a mens only dorm in college) and to provide the same separation for developmentally challenged students so to speak.

    This would assist in the reinforcement of gender excellences regardless of gender bias, but prevent problems of gender identity caused by developmental deficiencies in the environment.

    Of course, if we just 1) cut school days to 4 hours (maximum possible utility of school), instead of treating school as day care; and 2) if we stopped subsidizing the underclasses so that taxes could return to pre-redistribution levels, and 3) that one income was sufficient for a family, then the problem would self correct.

    Because it is a consequence of socialization under leftist influence.

    The left has been a cancer for mankind. It’s the madness of women’s desperate instincts that her child must be worthy writ large.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 07:53:00 UTC

  • “The alt right’s coalition crosses multiple classes. The manosphere is right abo

    —“The alt right’s coalition crosses multiple classes. The manosphere is right about the nature of women, the HBD people are right about the difference in Race, the identitarians are right about the necessity of tribe and scale, the traditionalists are empiricists, going with what has worked. We need some combination of all these disparate groups’ differing solutions, to get ourselves out of the Marxian problems.”– Ryan Williams

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:41:00 UTC