(humor with wisdom)
lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really.
(Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”)
(Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 )
God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
WHY DO WOMEN HIT ME? (humor with wisdom) lolz… why do all the women in my life
WHY DO WOMEN HIT ME?
(humor with wisdom)
lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really.
(Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”)
(Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 )
God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 12:31:00 UTC
-
The Simplification Of Political Discourse
The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down. -
The Simplification Of Political Discourse
The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down. -
THE SIMPLIFICATION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE The left differs from the right just a
THE SIMPLIFICATION OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE
The left differs from the right just as men differ from women. The left does not require consistency, because they do not require reciprocity, because they are parasites seeking power not producers seeking markets. Left (Females) gossip, inflate and conflate to exaggerate the experiential for illustration, while Right (Males) use history and hyperbole to inflate the long term for illustration. Only the right seeks competitive survivability. The left and the female like flora and rabbits simply seek to cast their genes to the wind. We cannot change these cognitive biases. And if we look at history, it was the invention of patriarchy (masculinity) that dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty, and the feminine (abrahamic) that drags it back down.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-10 09:10:00 UTC
-
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acq
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations. Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement. As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it. -
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acq
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations. Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement. As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it. -
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acq
Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations.
Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement.
As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:39:00 UTC
-
“Is modern art masculine or feminine?”—Erik Lukovsky It is not so much masculi
—“Is modern art masculine or feminine?”—Erik Lukovsky It is not so much masculine versus feminine, but decoration, criticism and ridicule versus art, heroism, and sacredness. In the sense that modern art is gossip, and traditional art is sacred then yes, modern art is feminine and traditional art is masculine. Furthermore, modern art is, like gossip and criticism, cheap, whereas traditional heroic art is expensive, like truth and sacredness. So one of the factors driving modern art is the same as that driving all other forms of fashion: producing consumable status signals for ever lower classes. And while aristocracy of necessity shall demonstrate masculine values, peasantry of necessity shall demonstrate feminine values. DIfferences in all forms of capital concentration: individual male, collective female. -
“Is modern art masculine or feminine?”—Erik Lukovsky It is not so much masculi
—“Is modern art masculine or feminine?”—Erik Lukovsky It is not so much masculine versus feminine, but decoration, criticism and ridicule versus art, heroism, and sacredness. In the sense that modern art is gossip, and traditional art is sacred then yes, modern art is feminine and traditional art is masculine. Furthermore, modern art is, like gossip and criticism, cheap, whereas traditional heroic art is expensive, like truth and sacredness. So one of the factors driving modern art is the same as that driving all other forms of fashion: producing consumable status signals for ever lower classes. And while aristocracy of necessity shall demonstrate masculine values, peasantry of necessity shall demonstrate feminine values. DIfferences in all forms of capital concentration: individual male, collective female.