Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Are Some Races More Kind, Gentle, Submissive, Beta, And Respectful Towards Their Elders Than Other Races?

    Well, yes, but it’s terribly impolitic to say so and terribly impolitic to ask. But, my job is answering the ‘impolitic and hard’ questions

    The correct question is, “Do some subraces tribes or clans demonstrate lower clannishness and higher extension of kingroup trust to non-kin?”

    1. The answer is yes. (See research on infants in cribs, and research on babies and very young on those they don’t know).
    2. The answer is yes and appears to be like most things, dependent upon ancestral environments. Homogeneity breeds tolerance and heterogeneity breeds clannishness. And we see this all over the world in every racial, subracial, tribal, clan, and class grouping.
    3. The answer is yes and it appears to be neoteny/pedomorphism, meaning the preservation of adolescent traits into adults.
    4. The answer is yes, and it appears that just like in other animals, the primary means of neoteny is reduction of the rate and depth of maturity.
    5. The answer is yes and it appears that the clannishness (Tolerance) of racial groups is measurable in the races by testosterone levels. (it also appears that most variation in homo-sapiens-sapiens is endocrine and therefore developmental. In this measurement east asians have the lowest testosterone, greatest neoteny, and as a consequence longest lives. Second to east asians are western europeans. Both of these groups could evolve without excessive competition from competing subracies and tribes. (Homogeneity is better in the long run in every sense.)
    6. Whites demonstrate the lowest clannishness (really). East asians and west asians (semites, and turkish) are the most clannish And everyone else is downhill from there. The difference is that east asians are not under threat from immigration and whites are.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-some-races-more-kind-gentle-submissive-beta-and-respectful-towards-their-elders-than-other-races

  • Are Some Races More Kind, Gentle, Submissive, Beta, And Respectful Towards Their Elders Than Other Races?

    Well, yes, but it’s terribly impolitic to say so and terribly impolitic to ask. But, my job is answering the ‘impolitic and hard’ questions

    The correct question is, “Do some subraces tribes or clans demonstrate lower clannishness and higher extension of kingroup trust to non-kin?”

    1. The answer is yes. (See research on infants in cribs, and research on babies and very young on those they don’t know).
    2. The answer is yes and appears to be like most things, dependent upon ancestral environments. Homogeneity breeds tolerance and heterogeneity breeds clannishness. And we see this all over the world in every racial, subracial, tribal, clan, and class grouping.
    3. The answer is yes and it appears to be neoteny/pedomorphism, meaning the preservation of adolescent traits into adults.
    4. The answer is yes, and it appears that just like in other animals, the primary means of neoteny is reduction of the rate and depth of maturity.
    5. The answer is yes and it appears that the clannishness (Tolerance) of racial groups is measurable in the races by testosterone levels. (it also appears that most variation in homo-sapiens-sapiens is endocrine and therefore developmental. In this measurement east asians have the lowest testosterone, greatest neoteny, and as a consequence longest lives. Second to east asians are western europeans. Both of these groups could evolve without excessive competition from competing subracies and tribes. (Homogeneity is better in the long run in every sense.)
    6. Whites demonstrate the lowest clannishness (really). East asians and west asians (semites, and turkish) are the most clannish And everyone else is downhill from there. The difference is that east asians are not under threat from immigration and whites are.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-some-races-more-kind-gentle-submissive-beta-and-respectful-towards-their-elders-than-other-races

  • Possibly, but …. there is pretty good research on the testosterone possibility

    Possibly, but …. there is pretty good research on the testosterone possibility, and as far as I know, sexuality has no significant nutritional composition.An viable hypothesis is that testosterone literally ‘damages’ the fetus, which explains why males take longer to mature.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 21:22:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945766754231431168

    Reply addressees: @Jeffrey_of_Troy @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945746377706913792

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jeffrey_of_Troy

    @curtdoolittle @SteveStuWill Or she used up all her nutrients on the first few kids, not enough left to fully supply growing baby.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945746377706913792

  • They are rejecting the state by doubling down on internal signals. Just as progr

    They are rejecting the state by doubling down on internal signals. Just as progressives double down on equality (false), double down on gender (false), double down on class(false), double down on norms (false). EVERYONE SIGNALS WITH LIES. That’s Religious Devotion: Lie-Signals

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 02:59:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945489266267783169

    Reply addressees: @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942637854710255621

    IN REPLY TO:

    @conradhackett

    34% of Americans reject evolution entirely, say humans existed in present form since beginning of time https://t.co/Hq1Fm2pJNz

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942637854710255621

  • Ricky, The counter is that high IQ people (high neoteny) can’t survive in those

    Ricky, The counter is that high IQ people (high neoteny) can’t survive in those climates. Rapid maturation (reverse neoteny) is the only local advantage. Africans have higher extroversion, lower neoteny. Which is what you’d expect in steep disease gradient. (See Huntington)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 01:24:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944740632601530368

    Reply addressees: @RickyVaughn_II @simongerman600 @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944681231634984960

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944681231634984960

  • KEY PHRASE: “Society Expects….” “Society Expects” is one of the feminine cogni

    KEY PHRASE: “Society Expects….”

    “Society Expects” is one of the feminine cognitive biases that the left took advantage of exploiting. Like NAXALT it’s a genetically consistent proclivity that the male brain is not subject to. The division of labor under low burdens (taxation) is the only means of providing a woman with family and consumption, and a man with family and consumption.

    Fertile women in the workplace is merely Veblen’s criticism put to exploitive means by the left (social democrats) as a means of overthrowing meritocracy (paternalism)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-16 09:29:00 UTC

  • KEY PHRASE: “Society Expects….” “Society Expects” is one of the feminine cogni

    KEY PHRASE: “Society Expects….” “Society Expects” is one of the feminine cognitive biases that the left took advantage of exploiting. Like NAXALT it’s a genetically consistent proclivity that the male brain is not subject to. The division of labor under low burdens (taxation) is the only means of providing a woman with family and consumption, and a man with family and consumption. Fertile women in the workplace is merely Veblen’s criticism put to exploitive means by the left (social democrats) as a means of overthrowing meritocracy (paternalism)

  • KEY PHRASE: “Society Expects….” “Society Expects” is one of the feminine cogni

    KEY PHRASE: “Society Expects….” “Society Expects” is one of the feminine cognitive biases that the left took advantage of exploiting. Like NAXALT it’s a genetically consistent proclivity that the male brain is not subject to. The division of labor under low burdens (taxation) is the only means of providing a woman with family and consumption, and a man with family and consumption. Fertile women in the workplace is merely Veblen’s criticism put to exploitive means by the left (social democrats) as a means of overthrowing meritocracy (paternalism)

  • The family is the result of a compromise in the market between male and female r

    The family is the result of a compromise in the market between male and female reproductive strategies, while prohibiting the export of the cost of one’s behavior and reproduction on the polity. If that compromise doesn’t exist, male interest is merely to return to rule. #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-12 16:22:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/940617965917130752

  • (from Quora) —“What are the most common lies women tell men?”— Women do not

    (from Quora)

    —“What are the most common lies women tell men?”—

    Women do not speak in truth or even grasp it’s value, for the simple reason that truth requires an intertemporal (long term) contract. Women instead, speak in conveniences, for the simple reason that they never hold to contracts, only conveniences. If you want to understand the difference between the ethics of the sexes, this is largely it: male long term loyalty and truth, female short term and consensus-preservation and convenience. Pack vs Community. Comfort with conflict vs terror at the possibility

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-08 14:31:00 UTC