The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence.
In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men.
Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio
The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence.
In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men.
Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:49:00 UTC
-
The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio
The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence. In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men. Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel. -
You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech. -
DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veVONaeTBVMYOU DO NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE WITH WOMEN. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT YOU CAN AND DENY THEM WHAT YOU MUST.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech.Updated Mar 16, 2018, 12:48 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:48:00 UTC
-
You Do Not Debate Or Argue With Women. You Give Them What You Can And Deny Them What You Must.
I have made this argument over and over again, my difference is that I do not believe the incentive exists for women to force the change unless we counter-react against crazy-women (which is a very large percentage of women) by threat of binding ALL women. Hence my emphasis on truthful reciprocal speech. -
he doesn’t ignore it. but then again, the data is the same on entry an exit so i
he doesn’t ignore it. but then again, the data is the same on entry an exit so it cant be bias that causes it. there would have to higher dropout rates for women rater than th other way around. coeducation is great for women but bad for men. wo competition men have no incentive.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 02:19:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974107902209294338
Reply addressees: @WebPaigee @leo_charlton
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974107018335223810
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974107018335223810
-
But that isnt what he says, right?Women self select for certain experiences as d
But that isnt what he says, right?Women self select for certain experiences as do men. they self select obvious interests.They do it for evolutionary reasons. You can try to expand female participation and we do. That hasnt changed the numbers. Its due to male departure (really)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 02:13:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974106249129332736
Reply addressees: @WebPaigee @leo_charlton
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974104778438529024
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974104778438529024
-
That is correct which is why we have +10,000 in maror studies, ignore self repor
That is correct which is why we have +10,000 in maror studies, ignore self reported studies, cross reference genetic, neurological, cognitive, developmental, long term, and twin studies that confirm the obvious: we are no different from other mammals except speech lets us lie.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 01:56:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974102127621693440
Reply addressees: @leo_charlton @WebPaigee
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974100890771689472
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974100890771689472
-
Actually the research results are overwhelming, which is why the nature-nurture
Actually the research results are overwhelming, which is why the nature-nurture debate is over, along with the blank slate being over. Much to the disappointment of mothers everywhere who chose to mate poorly. You can harm your child, but not improve him or her. The Die is cast.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 01:52:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974101079666446337
Reply addressees: @WebPaigee @leo_charlton
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974099226543230976
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974099226543230976