Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Women gossip to undermine alphas – and hen peck each other in corporations to th

    Women gossip to undermine alphas – and hen peck each other in corporations to the point where they are mutually self destructive. Do they conspire by intent, common interest, or genetic disposition?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 20:50:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975474446160023552

    Reply addressees: @hbdchick @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975474175367401473

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit This is a justification. All groups share developmental, demographic,and geographic advantages, institutionalize and exploit them. CONSPIRACY OF COMMON INTEREST != CONSPIRACY OF INTENT but the OUTCOME is the SAME.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975474175367401473

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit This is a justification. All groups share developmental, demographic,and geographic advantages, institutionalize and exploit them. CONSPIRACY OF COMMON INTEREST != CONSPIRACY OF INTENT but the OUTCOME is the SAME.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975474175367401473

  • As you’ve pointed out, the agrarian meat grinder on both extreme east and extrem

    As you’ve pointed out, the agrarian meat grinder on both extreme east and extreme west seems to have done its job in domesticating (cutting testosterone) while continental axis clans couldn’t isolate sufficiently. It’s also why all the ‘bad’ cyclically issued from steppe/desert.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 20:45:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975473286162284544

    Reply addressees: @hbdchick @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit (a) It’s actually High-Trust/Male/Agrarian vs Low-Trust/Female/Pastoral.
    (b) Not sure genetic vs cultural, but as you’ve advocated it appears much more genetic.
    (c) I’m pretty sure that major group differences are pedomorphism/neoteny + size of underclass + gender endocrine bias

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit (a) It’s actually High-Trust/Male/Agrarian vs Low-Trust/Female/Pastoral.
    (b) Not sure genetic vs cultural, but as you’ve advocated it appears much more genetic.
    (c) I’m pretty sure that major group differences are pedomorphism/neoteny + size of underclass + gender endocrine bias

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

  • If that’s right we should see dimorphic differences, brain structure differences

    If that’s right we should see dimorphic differences, brain structure differences, leading to verbal skill variation, moral intuition variation, greater gender variation, earlier or stronger asymmetric maturity,and differences in expression of aggression. And that is what we see.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 20:43:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975472740319875075

    Reply addressees: @hbdchick @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit (a) It’s actually High-Trust/Male/Agrarian vs Low-Trust/Female/Pastoral.
    (b) Not sure genetic vs cultural, but as you’ve advocated it appears much more genetic.
    (c) I’m pretty sure that major group differences are pedomorphism/neoteny + size of underclass + gender endocrine bias

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @hbdchick @TOOEdit (a) It’s actually High-Trust/Male/Agrarian vs Low-Trust/Female/Pastoral.
    (b) Not sure genetic vs cultural, but as you’ve advocated it appears much more genetic.
    (c) I’m pretty sure that major group differences are pedomorphism/neoteny + size of underclass + gender endocrine bias

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

  • (a) It’s actually High-Trust/Male/Agrarian vs Low-Trust/Female/Pastoral. (b) Not

    (a) It’s actually High-Trust/Male/Agrarian vs Low-Trust/Female/Pastoral.
    (b) Not sure genetic vs cultural, but as you’ve advocated it appears much more genetic.
    (c) I’m pretty sure that major group differences are pedomorphism/neoteny + size of underclass + gender endocrine bias

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 20:40:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975471931033047040

    Reply addressees: @hbdchick @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974642027349635072

    IN REPLY TO:

    @hbdchick

    my guess/prediction/bet: alt-right types who accept @TOOEdit’s theory about jews having a group evolutionary strategy tend to come from pops with particularistic (“clannish”) moral systems. #CognitiveBiases #EyeOfBeholder #HumanAllTooHuman

    (for god’s sake, don’t @ me!)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974642027349635072

  • The female brain, whether in male or female body, assumes an infinite value to c

    The female brain, whether in male or female body, assumes an infinite value to cooperation, and a great difficulty in separation. But that’s simply false. Cooperation is only valuable until it isn’t. Just as predation is only valuable to it isn’t. At present, cooperation isn’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 19:21:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975452248049373184

  • 1 – The difference between an Abrahamist > Marxist > Postmodernist > Feminist (t

    1 – The difference between an Abrahamist > Marxist > Postmodernist > Feminist (the female reproductive strategy) and a contractualist (the ascendent male reproductive strategy), and an authoritarian (established male strategy) is that …

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 14:26:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975377996919033856

  • (I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are o

    (I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are often happy to compete rather than conform. So as she describes herself as a bleeding heart liberal – in other words has the intuitions of a female – I ended up the opposite specializing in competition and natural law – with the intuitions of a male. As far as I know the autism spectrum increases the distance between our intuitions and our reason for what appear to be extremely trivial reasons in the early neural economy – but that has had zero impact on how we decide those questions that are solved only by intuition: by rather than reason. Women think like women do, and men think like men do, because our competing gender reproductive strategies evolved prior to our use of reason, and almost certainly before our development of consciousness. There is a difference between the male and female brain structure due to the development of that distance, but there is also a difference between the male and female structure due to endocrine influences. But we can still observe that we see both genders with both reproductive, social and cognitive biases each varying along the male and female axis of development.)

  • (I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are o

    (I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are often happy to compete rather than conform. So as she describes herself as a bleeding heart liberal – in other words has the intuitions of a female – I ended up the opposite specializing in competition and natural law – with the intuitions of a male. As far as I know the autism spectrum increases the distance between our intuitions and our reason for what appear to be extremely trivial reasons in the early neural economy – but that has had zero impact on how we decide those questions that are solved only by intuition: by rather than reason. Women think like women do, and men think like men do, because our competing gender reproductive strategies evolved prior to our use of reason, and almost certainly before our development of consciousness. There is a difference between the male and female brain structure due to the development of that distance, but there is also a difference between the male and female structure due to endocrine influences. But we can still observe that we see both genders with both reproductive, social and cognitive biases each varying along the male and female axis of development.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 14:18:00 UTC

  • (I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are o

    (I have had the same experience, but the difference is, that as a male, we are often happy to compete rather than conform. So as she describes herself as a bleeding heart liberal – in other words has the intuitions of a female – I ended up the opposite specializing in competition and natural law – with the intuitions of a male. As far as I know the autism spectrum increases the distance between our intuitions and our reason for what appear to be extremely trivial reasons in the early neural economy – but that has had zero impact on how we decide those questions that are solved only by intuition: by rather than reason. Women think like women do, and men think like men do, because our competing gender reproductive strategies evolved prior to our use of reason, and almost certainly before our development of consciousness. There is a difference between the male and female brain structure due to the development of that distance, but there is also a difference between the male and female structure due to endocrine influences. But we can still observe that we see both genders with both reproductive, social and cognitive biases each varying along the male and female axis of development.)

  • An Example Of Testimonial Prose

    –“the left and right both argue for inclusion but along different lines.”– A Friend Dysgenic expansion on the left (female), vs eugenic expansion on the right (male) Female and male strategies compete. Or perhaps ‘adapt’ is a better way of looking at it. So ‘along different lines’ obscure that those lines are not ‘relative’ but produce vastly different externalities. This is an example why I use operational langauge and full accounting – I don’t leave obscurant statements un accounted for. Testimonialism: 1 – Operational Language (Operations are measurements) 2 – Deflated vocabular tested by series. 3 – Complete Sentences describing complete transactions. 4 – Testing Rational Choice, and Reciprocity 5 – Accounting for the seen (internal) and unseen (external). By simple use of operational grammar (the rules I just stated) we test categorical, logical, empirical, existential, rational, reciprocal, fully accounted prose just a surely as we test any statement in other logics and mathematics. In other words, just as all other forms of calculation falsify but do not justify, operational grammar falsified but does not justify. The only difference is that operational grammar is complete in that it includes all actionable dimensions of reality, not some subset or general rule of reality. If one cannot make such a statement in operational language he knows not of what he speaks. He just uses convention and habit like any other storyteller.