Science helps us in matters of mutual misunderstanding between men and women (Or the male brain and female brain): 1) There is a female, genetic, cognitive bias, toward Solipsism, or what women generally refer to as “personalizing” an argument; 2) Just as there is a related female, genetic, cognitive bias to argue the person rather than the argument; 3) just as there is a related female genetic, cognitive bias to NAXALT (“not all x are like that”) – which is the failure to intuit the difference between a distribution (curve) and equality (line); 4) Just as there is a related female genetic cognitive bias to conflate the desirable/undesirable, with the good/true. And… you are demonstrating all those female, genetic, cognitive biases that evolution gave you, so that you would protect your children from any form of outcasting (negative differentiation, boycott) that would limit their chances of prosperity – or even survival. I am not a woman, with solipsistic cognitive biases for the purpose of protecting my offspring, but a man, with analytic cognitive biases for the purpose of maintaining or increasing the competitive capacity of the tribe that consists of my brothers our mates, and offspring. As such while it is in your reproductive interest to be ‘confused’ to some degree, it is in my reproductive interests to not be. You cannot afford to fail to grasp the world of threats to your offspring as it is, just as I cannot afford to fail grasp the world of threats to my tribe as it is. Ergo, I don’t confuse the good/bad with the true/false, nor make the mistake of equality vs distribution, nor deny the overwhelming evidence of demonstrated human nature (prostitution vs war) throughout all of human and pre-human history. What I understand you to be saying is that you do not want the public to hold a low opinion of women like you because it would put you at an even greater status disadvantage than you had been in the past. And that I can understand. But conversely, I don’t make the mistake of saying that because males disproportionately commit violent crime, that there is any chance I will commit violent crime. Nor would I say it was bad or false to say that they do so. Truth is truth. Period. Apr 19, 2018 5:21am
Theme: Sex Differences
-
SMV
The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test (raise) their market value (SMV), and the endless supply of men’s attention that will never tire of ‘window shopping’ same sites (pages, streams, forums). The age of 23 is peak female SMV (market value), because it is peak fertility. However, long term SMV, differs greatly. In other words, it’s pretty hard to be 23 and not attractive. It’s pretty hard to be over 35 and be attractive. And only the best genes last beyond 45. Now men, we don’t peak until 34 or so, and our SMV only increases if we remain fit, sociable, and have assets. The difference between the genders is that we can choose to have high SMV – OR CHOOSE NOT TO.
-
SMV
The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test (raise) their market value (SMV), and the endless supply of men’s attention that will never tire of ‘window shopping’ same sites (pages, streams, forums). The age of 23 is peak female SMV (market value), because it is peak fertility. However, long term SMV, differs greatly. In other words, it’s pretty hard to be 23 and not attractive. It’s pretty hard to be over 35 and be attractive. And only the best genes last beyond 45. Now men, we don’t peak until 34 or so, and our SMV only increases if we remain fit, sociable, and have assets. The difference between the genders is that we can choose to have high SMV – OR CHOOSE NOT TO.
-
“If masculinity were truly toxic, then fatherlessness wouldn’t be correlated wit
—“If masculinity were truly toxic, then fatherlessness wouldn’t be correlated with literally every societal ill.”— Ana Stowe
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 18:01:00 UTC
-
The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test
The endless supply of 17-23 year old girls that send photos to web sites to test (raise) their market value (SMV), and the endless supply of men’s attention that will never tire of ‘window shopping’ same sites (pages, streams, forums). The age of 23 is peak female SMV (market value), because it is peak fertility. However, long term SMV, differs greatly. In other words, it’s pretty hard to be 23 and not attractive. It’s pretty hard to be over 35 and be attractive. And only the best genes last beyond 45. Now men, we don’t peak until 34 or so, and our SMV only increases if we remain fit, sociable, and have assets. The difference between the genders is that we can choose to have high SMV – OR CHOOSE NOT TO.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 10:01:00 UTC
-
Untitled
http://quillette.com/2018/04/12/training-masculinity-children/
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 08:22:00 UTC
-
What makes women equal to one another and in value to men, is childbearing
What makes women equal to one another and in value to men, is childbearing.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 07:59:00 UTC
-
MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE COGNITIVE BIASES Science helps us in matters of mut
MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE COGNITIVE BIASES
Science helps us in matters of mutual misunderstanding between men and women (Or the male brain and female brain):
1) There is a female, genetic, cognitive bias, toward Solipsism, or what women generally refer to as “personalizing” an argument;
2) Just as there is a related female, genetic, cognitive bias to argue the person rather than the argument;
3) just as there is a related female genetic, cognitive bias to NAXALT (“not all x are like that”) – which is the failure to intuit the difference between a distribution (curve) and equality (line);
4) Just as there is a related female genetic cognitive bias to conflate the desirable/undesirable, with the good/true.
And… you are demonstrating all those female, genetic, cognitive biases that evolution gave you, so that you would protect your children from any form of outcasting (negative differentiation, boycott) that would limit their chances of prosperity – or even survival.
I am not a woman, with solipsistic cognitive biases for the purpose of protecting my offspring, but a man, with analytic cognitive biases for the purpose of maintaining or increasing the competitive capacity of the tribe that consists of my brothers our mates, and offspring.
As such while it is in your reproductive interest to be ‘confused’ to some degree, it is in my reproductive interests to not be. You cannot afford to fail to grasp the world of threats to your offspring as it is, just as I cannot afford to fail grasp the world of threats to my tribe as it is.
Ergo, I don’t confuse the good/bad with the true/false, nor make the mistake of equality vs distribution, nor deny the overwhelming evidence of demonstrated human nature (prostitution vs war) throughout all of human and pre-human history.
What I understand you to be saying is that you do not want the public to hold a low opinion of women like you because it would put you at an even greater status disadvantage than you had been in the past. And that I can understand.
But conversely, I don’t make the mistake of saying that because males disproportionately commit violent crime, that there is any chance I will commit violent crime. Nor would I say it was bad or false to say that they do so. Truth is truth. Period.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 05:21:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30741116_10156294884077264_50772077
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30741116_10156294884077264_5077207752590229504_o_10156294884072264.jpg the only thing really interesting in this year’s survey:Stephen KlostermeierYou were named dropped in Andy Warski’s show tonight. Should see if you can get on to talk propertarianism.Apr 17, 2018 9:19pmAustyn Pemberwhen?Apr 17, 2018 9:24pmStephen KlostermeierIn the middle of the show. Someone donated and asked them about itApr 17, 2018 9:25pmCurt Doolittle(who is andy warki?)Apr 17, 2018 9:35pmAustyn Pembermost popular YT streamer right now (in the political sphere)Apr 17, 2018 9:37pmStephen KlostermeierAverages around 4k live viewers every showApr 17, 2018 9:37pmStephen KlostermeierHis co-host is also one of the leading scientists in the alt-right.Apr 17, 2018 9:42pmBen HartselleHe’s hosted guys like Jared Taylor, Mike Enoch and Ry DawsonApr 17, 2018 9:43pmJames CohenCurt, please talk to Sven and Enoch and see if they can get you in contact with Warski. Getting on Warski Live would do wonders for your outreach.Apr 17, 2018 9:43pmStephen KlostermeierI just dropped it in his chat. I am one of his mods. I can dm him on twitter if Curt is interestedApr 17, 2018 9:44pmBen HartselleI mean, I just Emailed him to get Ry Dawson on.Apr 17, 2018 9:45pmStephen KlostermeierBut I agree it would be great for him. He needs more exposure and Andy has a great platform.Apr 17, 2018 9:48pmDaniel Travis@[100000806477516:2048:Stephen Klostermeier] 100% agreeApr 17, 2018 9:55pmMegan K. UsuiAsk him to get Curt to debate Dyer LOLApr 17, 2018 9:55pmStephen Klostermeier@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] Are you interested?Apr 17, 2018 9:55pmMegan K. UsuiCurt – these are (the most popular) children IMO. Better let Eli talk to them.Apr 17, 2018 9:58pmMegan K. Usui@Stephen. Please promote Eli of the Propertarian Institute. I insist.Apr 17, 2018 10:02pmStephen KlostermeierChildren or not. The platform has a LOT of pull right now.Apr 17, 2018 10:02pmStephen KlostermeierCurt was the one name dropped. Jf said he is planning on reading up on Curt and his ideas.
It’s a really good opportunityApr 17, 2018 10:08pmAustyn PemberThey are looking for a lot of entertainment value, not in education.Apr 17, 2018 10:08pmStephen KlostermeierThey had Ryan Dawson on… That dude is not entertaining but VERY infightful.
It’s all good if he doesn’t want too. I can help him get on if he does tho.Apr 17, 2018 10:11pmMegan K. Usui@[100000806477516:2048:Stephen] – please send JF this link: https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/Apr 17, 2018 10:13pmStephen KlostermeierHe has it.Apr 17, 2018 10:14pmChris MoyerGood, now I can stop spam posting him on twitter about it 😂Apr 17, 2018 10:18pmMegan K. UsuiTell them Curt will do it if he can continue his debate with Dyer from two years ago when Dyer fled to the mattresses. That will be entertainment.Apr 17, 2018 10:19pmStephen KlostermeierIf Curt wants to do it. They can set that upApr 17, 2018 10:20pmStephen KlostermeierIn fact that is kinda their whole platform right now.Apr 17, 2018 10:23pmMegan K. Usui@[741197263:2048:Curt] they’re going to see if Dyer will accept. He’s gonna punk out. But if he accepts…..remember you promised me 😘Apr 17, 2018 10:33pmJesse RobersonHis name is Adam race WarskiApr 18, 2018 11:37amJesse Robersonhttps://youtu.be/1-ygbmjqE3oApr 18, 2018 11:38amStephen KlostermeierWelp……. Dyer is legitmately afraid to have another debate with Curt. lmaoApr 19, 2018 12:10amMegan K. UsuiMaybe we’ll have @[741197263:2048:Curt] record a “hey you munchkin” vid especially for Jay and JF can air that right before pitting ELI UP AGAINST BLONDE IN THE BELLY OF THE BEAST ON REPEALING THE 19TH.Apr 19, 2018 12:42amthe only thing really interesting in this year’s survey:
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 21:15:00 UTC
-
DEFINITION: “HAZARD” (…in progress) (A definition of hazard “baiting” – which
DEFINITION: “HAZARD”
(…in progress)
(A definition of hazard “baiting” – which is the (((female))) means of persuasion)
Truth, vs Honesty, Deceit, vs Fraud, vs Hazard
Creating a hazard:
Via Positiva:
1 – Creating the opportunity for a trap by asymmetric information.
2 – Laying a trap by physical, informational, or emotional means;
3 – Profiting from or benefitting from failure to disclose possibility of a trap (risk, failure, outcome).
and
Via Negativa:
3 – Failing to perform due diligence against a random harm from another.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 13:03:00 UTC