by Candice Mary
When foreigners kill men’s comrades and give them the option to surrender and become slaves, men attack.
Women ask instead “what language do we speak? What god do we worship?”
Women evolved to shape themselves to the men who capture them.
Now, just replace “Foreign men” with “Government” and there is the answer.
We can be mad about that or accept reality and manage it.
“Women seek and adapt to power.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-25 17:17:00 UTC
There are plenty of good women. They are just rarely on the market precisely because they are good women. There are plenty of good men. They are just rarely on the market precisely because they are good men. The problem with good men and good women is that relationships do fail today, and they don’t maintain their sexual market value. And if they did, it’s probably that their relationships wouldn’t have failed.
Maintain your sexual market value. It’s not complicated. Stop putting things in your mouth. Sleep. And get just a little exercise (walk a lot and fast).
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 19:46:00 UTC
Men have stalkers too. They just go away more easily.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 10:21:00 UTC
Disapproval, shaming, rallying, as a substitute for argument (conflation of good/bad with true/false ) is gender biased cognitive bias, just as is psychosis/solipsism vs psychopathy/autism. Either make the argument or at least be honest and say you can’t. But don’t waste my time.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 01:03:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/988584249736531973
Disapproval, shaming, rallying, as a substitute for argument (conflation of good/bad with true/false ) is gender biased cognitive bias, just as is psychosis/solipsism vs psychopathy/autism. Either make the argument or at least be honest and say you can’t. But don’t waste my time.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 21:03:00 UTC
Or you can simply look at it as (((they))) are all cognitively female, and that (((they))) are just the most evolved version of “Sh– Tester” (females), and we need to correct both problems.
Which is how I look at it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 15:43:00 UTC
—“If masculinity were truly toxic what does that say about the 53.2 million copies of “50 Shades of Grey” purchased by females?”—James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 18:42:00 UTC
I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism. The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning. There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.
I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism. The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning. There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31084197_10156304578912264_6632309423563866112_n_10156304578907264.jpg Now If I remember correctly this is from a relatively small sample size of largely white people. I might be wrong, but that’s what I recall. That said, it’s about what we’d expect.
REMEMBER: IQ = Potential, and personality traits can increase potential and decrease potential.Thorsten Stuart NorgateIt’s a very interesting list, and I’m probably smack in the middle being a law enforcement officer with a history degree. But I’ve met many people who have incredibly high IQs who can barely perform daily tasks, such as getting dressed in the right clothes, or not forgetting to shower – and I’m serious!Apr 22, 2018 10:12amTom WattI consider myself an underachiever. Maybe just autistic.
No patience for the sciences.
Law was a thought at one time…got woke.Apr 22, 2018 10:38amBrendan HegartyHow the Hell does one have sub 100 iq and become an EE? Rote learning of some solutions cook book?Apr 22, 2018 11:05amJay BryceAffirmative actionApr 22, 2018 11:11amBrendan HegartyYou still have to GET BY at the minimum.Apr 22, 2018 11:12amJay BryceI don’t think you necessarily do. Get pushed through in school and then get hired by a company who needs to meet diversity goals, put you in a back room counting something.Apr 22, 2018 11:14amJaimz BeelThorsten Stuart NorgateApr 22, 2018 11:28amBill JoslinYa those ranges are.quite broadApr 22, 2018 12:14pmMichael AndradeThe distribution for “social scientists” is… generous… at best. Most modern economists are little more than journalists who are very good at their job (producing lies). Sociologists, anthropologists, and Black/Gender/bullshit studies professors are much, much dumber and far, far more arrogant about how smart they’re told they are.
Source: 6 years in the most Leftist PhD Economics program in the country.Apr 22, 2018 12:22pmDaniel SeisDo you mean jewish males or how is that distributed over sex/race (your best guess)?Apr 22, 2018 11:02pmNow If I remember correctly this is from a relatively small sample size of largely white people. I might be wrong, but that’s what I recall. That said, it’s about what we’d expect.
REMEMBER: IQ = Potential, and personality traits can increase potential and decrease potential.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:43:00 UTC