Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Reason Magazine as The Immature Male

    Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests. 

    <--Female--------Ascendent Male-------Established Male-->
....Consumption...Production...........Preservation...
....Short Term....Medium Term..........Long Term.....
....Socialism.....Libertarian..........Aristocracy....
....Gossip........Exchange.............Force.........

    (a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending) (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish) (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical) (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian) (e) Where does each sit on this scale? Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left. In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.

  • Reason Magazine as The Immature Male

    Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests. 

    <--Female--------Ascendent Male-------Established Male-->
....Consumption...Production...........Preservation...
....Short Term....Medium Term..........Long Term.....
....Socialism.....Libertarian..........Aristocracy....
....Gossip........Exchange.............Force.........

    (a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending) (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish) (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical) (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian) (e) Where does each sit on this scale? Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left. In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE Reason M

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE

    Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests.

    <-Female———-Ascendent Male——-Established Male->
    ….Consumption………..Production………………Preservation…
    ….Short Term…………Medium Term……………..Long Term…..
    ….Socialism……………..Libertarian………………..Aristocracy….
    ….Gossip…………………..Exchange……………………Force………

    (a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending)

    (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish)

    (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical)

    (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian)

    (e) Where does each sit on this scale?

    Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left.

    In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 13:33:12 UTC

  • REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of

    REASON MAGAZINE AS THE IMMATURE MALE

    Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests.

    <-Female———-Ascendent Male——-Established Male->

    ….Consumption………..Production………………Preservation…

    ….Short Term…………Medium Term……………..Long Term…..

    ….Socialism……………..Libertarian………………..Aristocracy….

    ….Gossip…………………..Exchange……………………Force………

    (a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending)

    (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish)

    (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical)

    (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian)

    (e) Where does each sit on this scale?

    Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left.

    In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 09:33:00 UTC

  • Feels and reals. It’s pointless. Never argue with the mind of a woman regardless

    Feels and reals. It’s pointless. Never argue with the mind of a woman regardless of her gender.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 00:46:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012135214804602880

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Feels and reals. It’s pointless. Never argue

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Feels and reals. It’s pointless. Never argue with the mind of a woman regardless of her gender.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 00:46:42 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Ever since my discovery that “They” are all c

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Ever since my discovery that “They” are all cognitively female, I’ve had this idea for an experiment where we find gender-typical arguments (naxalt etc) and then put the text under photos of opposite gender but same age and race, and class.

    When I listen to “Them” I realize that they are making cognitively female arguments, but with greater agency.

    I mean, it’s pretty simple: reverse dimorphism

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 00:31:56 UTC

  • Single Mothers Data: I Try, but Sometimes I Don”t Succeed.

    —“Evidence seems to suggest that children with single mothers grow up to be a menace whereas children with single fathers grow up just fine.”—Alba Rising Um… that’s not the case. It’s that single mothers are at much higher risk of unstable environments and higher risk of insecure (guilty) mother’s psychology affecting children negatively than single fathers for the simple reason that single fathers are more likely to cohabitate and produce a healthier environment lacking guilt, instability, and insecurity. Or conversely, that single mothers try too hard to control and influence their children at the expense of fathers who are high maintenance but produce healthier children even by dedicating far less attention to them. The fact single mothers produce the majority of problem adults doesn’t equal that the majority of single mothers produce problem adults. In other words, TWO PARENTS ARE BETTER THAN ONE. I thought I got this across but apparently not…..

  • Single Mothers Data: I Try, but Sometimes I Don”t Succeed.

    —“Evidence seems to suggest that children with single mothers grow up to be a menace whereas children with single fathers grow up just fine.”—Alba Rising Um… that’s not the case. It’s that single mothers are at much higher risk of unstable environments and higher risk of insecure (guilty) mother’s psychology affecting children negatively than single fathers for the simple reason that single fathers are more likely to cohabitate and produce a healthier environment lacking guilt, instability, and insecurity. Or conversely, that single mothers try too hard to control and influence their children at the expense of fathers who are high maintenance but produce healthier children even by dedicating far less attention to them. The fact single mothers produce the majority of problem adults doesn’t equal that the majority of single mothers produce problem adults. In other words, TWO PARENTS ARE BETTER THAN ONE. I thought I got this across but apparently not…..

  • I’ll say it if you won’t. It’s because men won’t cross the line because of the t

    I’ll say it if you won’t. It’s because men won’t cross the line because of the threat of inter-male violence. Women cross the line all the time because they know we won’t engage in violence with them under all but extreme circumstances (restraining them).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 23:46:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012120063896444928

    Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011876726962577408

    IN REPLY TO:

    @jordanbpeterson

    I said nothing of the sort: “Peterson, a professor of psychology at U Toronto, has complained that men can’t “control crazy women” because men “have absolutely no respect” for someone they cannot physically fight.” https://t.co/TAtAqAvRzi

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011876726962577408