Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Those with A History of Slavery and Peasantry Use Feminine Reasoning

    October 13th, 2018 4:24 AM THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING

    —“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov

    [B]ecause you’re confusing what people intend with what occurs. Instead it matters: 1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception) 2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises, 3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce, 4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics. IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia. 1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them. And; 2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants. And; 3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction). And; 4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia. 5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias. SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.

  • “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM”

    October 13th, 2018 5:40 PM “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM” LOLZ By Giego Caleiro

    I hereby coin the term: “Argument Ad Uterum” A classical form of fallacious argument in which a fertile female, often a bipolar girlfriend, a feminist, or a pawn of leftwing ideology (NPC) threatens self-removal from a group, discussion, or event, as a means to socially sanction or control that which she, or anyone in the discussion, cannot argue against by legitimate means.

  • “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM”

    October 13th, 2018 5:40 PM “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM” LOLZ By Giego Caleiro

    I hereby coin the term: “Argument Ad Uterum” A classical form of fallacious argument in which a fertile female, often a bipolar girlfriend, a feminist, or a pawn of leftwing ideology (NPC) threatens self-removal from a group, discussion, or event, as a means to socially sanction or control that which she, or anyone in the discussion, cannot argue against by legitimate means.

  • “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM” LOLZ By Giego Caleiro I hereby coin the term: “Argument Ad

    “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM” LOLZ

    By Giego Caleiro

    I hereby coin the term:

    “Argument Ad Uterum”

    A classical form of fallacious argument in which a fertile female, often a bipolar girlfriend, a feminist, or a pawn of leftwing ideology (NPC) threatens self-removal from a group, discussion, or event, as a means to socially sanction or control that which she, or anyone in the discussion, cannot argue against by legitimate means.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 17:40:00 UTC

  • THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING —“lots of

    THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING

    —“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov

    Because you’re confusing what people intend. Instead it matters:

    1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception)

    2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises,

    3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce,

    4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia.

    1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them.

    And;

    2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants.

    And;

    3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction).

    And;

    4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia.

    5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias.

    SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 04:24:00 UTC

  • EUROPEAN VS SEMITIC(MESOPOTAMIAN) WEAPONIZATION OF GENDER REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIE

    EUROPEAN VS SEMITIC(MESOPOTAMIAN) WEAPONIZATION OF GENDER REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES

    I would argue that just as IE weaponized the male reproductive and persuasive strategy (aristocracy, heroism, truth, duty, reciprocity, law of tort: the Trial of Achilles), the Semites weaponized the female reproductive and persuasive strategy and produced a counter-revolution (heroism of submission, suffering, fictionalism, proportionality, conformity: the trials of the jews, the trials of jesus). Iteratively producing an intellectual vanguard (rabbinical judaism), revolt (christianity), and conquest by raiding (islam) producing the Abrahamic Dark Ages.

    And that Rousseau-Kant-Hegel are a rationalist counter-revolution against the anglo empiricists, and that Marx-Boaz-Freud-Cantor-Adorno (pseudoscience) produce a parallel counter revolution against the Scientific and Industrial Revolution of Darwin-Maxwell-Menger-Spencer-Nietzsche, and French POMO/Derrida-to-Rorty a reformation of Marx/Boaz/Freud produce a sophistry of denialism. All of which science is overthrowing at present, but not as fast as immigrants are being pumped into the system as replacement populations. (This analyzes the method of argument – or ‘grammars of argument’ – used by each party, rather than their claimed intentions.)

    1) Existence/Realism-Idealism/supernaturalism/occultism,

    2) Reason/Rationalsm-Sophism/justificationism,

    3) Mathematics-Mathematical Sophism/Innumeracy

    4) Science-Magic/Pseudoscience,

    Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction).

    Male Conflict Strategy: Argument, Threat, Violence, Conspiracy, ending with sortition (knowing one’s place) (oddly, males are actually closer and more loyal after fighting if ending in submission not ‘beating’.)

    In general, females never stop. Males stop.

    Abrahamic religions, continental rationalism, marxism-freudianism-feminism, french-anglo postmodernism rely on Pilpul (justificationary sophism), Critique (female conflict strategy of straw manning etc), producing relations inconstant, inconsistent, and incoherent with reality, but sufficient for pre-cognitive resistance at the cost of agency.

    This is in competition with European literature, philosophy, history, economics, law, science, logic, and mathematics of relations correspondent consistent and coherent with reality, sufficient for the production agency, and as a consequence of continuous recursive innovation.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 17:36:00 UTC

  • (“All mammals die of accumulated cellular damage. Dominant males accumulate more

    (“All mammals die of accumulated cellular damage. Dominant males accumulate more cellular damage faster.”) https://twitter.com/PsychoSchmitt/status/1050528359971741696

  • RT @StefanMolyneux: Conservatives want to have families. Leftists just want to h

    RT @StefanMolyneux: Conservatives want to have families.

    Leftists just want to have sex.

    Explains a lot.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 01:44:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050562741876940800

  • Gender Differences in Educational Demand

    October 11th, 2018 7:15 AM GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EDUCATIONAL DEMAND [T]he evidence is that women in education are damaging to society because they come from the bottom of their graduating classes; they prolong infantilization in order to maintain control; and they seek to teach in order to create an environment under their control; because women measure interactions in terms of attention rather than agency. The only solution is the russian-finnish-jewish model of making teachers the most sought after profession, requiring substantial life experience; having teachers follow children throughout their development; and to ensure that boys are taught by men of achievement after the age of nine. Women are doing better in contemporary education for the simple reason that they are creating female oriented (conformity) rather than male oriented (competitive) learning environments. Boys are more expensive to educate than girls for the simple reason that they mature more slowly, require physical exercise constantly, and require competitive games in order to maintain the same interest that girls maintain by submission and conformity. But likewise boys are more costly than girls if their education fails them.

  • Gender Differences in Educational Demand

    October 11th, 2018 7:15 AM GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EDUCATIONAL DEMAND [T]he evidence is that women in education are damaging to society because they come from the bottom of their graduating classes; they prolong infantilization in order to maintain control; and they seek to teach in order to create an environment under their control; because women measure interactions in terms of attention rather than agency. The only solution is the russian-finnish-jewish model of making teachers the most sought after profession, requiring substantial life experience; having teachers follow children throughout their development; and to ensure that boys are taught by men of achievement after the age of nine. Women are doing better in contemporary education for the simple reason that they are creating female oriented (conformity) rather than male oriented (competitive) learning environments. Boys are more expensive to educate than girls for the simple reason that they mature more slowly, require physical exercise constantly, and require competitive games in order to maintain the same interest that girls maintain by submission and conformity. But likewise boys are more costly than girls if their education fails them.