Theme: Sex Differences

  • RESTORING VIOLENCE TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS We removed violence from the discour

    RESTORING VIOLENCE TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS

    We removed violence from the discourse in order to accommodate women into the political system – despite the fact that the market for politics, like all other markets, is simply a proxy for violence. I set out to restore violence to libertarianism and it resulted in “Sovereigntarianism” (Propertarianism).

    Noah brings up the current context:

    –“Another big hurdle is adjusting mens relationship to violence. I have no problem with women saying “I disavow all violence” but I don’t want to hear men saying such weak things. We men need to embrace violence and the consequences of violence. The more comfortable we are with hard edged solutions the better. We don’ t seek them, but we don’t avoid what’s necessary. A failure to account for the power of violence has been a weakness of the right for too long.”—– Noah J Revoy

    You can’t peace your way into power unless you have power, and if you peace your way into power you will not retain it. Empires fall for this reason as much ore more so than any other. Pacifism is just rent seeking by avoidance of the cost of preservation of the natural order of reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 10:46:00 UTC

  • UM. THE GENDERS CANNOT TAKE EACH OTHER’S VENTING SERIOUSLY –“I can’t understand

    UM. THE GENDERS CANNOT TAKE EACH OTHER’S VENTING SERIOUSLY

    –“I can’t understand men who talk about … putting women back in the kitchen, out of the workforce, or referring to of r_pe during a war. …”— A Female Friend

    That’s because you aren’t a man. Just like I am not a woman and can’t imagine that they’re serious rather than hyperbolic (LARPing).

    I have overheard far too many conversations of women talking about their husbands as mere monetary and physical resources to be exploited, and the stupidity of men and how women would do such and such better, and how they need female ‘unity’. I am also aware that women are over-privileged compared to men in everything from moral intuitions, to daily life, to health care, to political processes. These things are simply empirical. But they do not change the opinions of women on their relative status.

    Naxalt(defense of child) is to some degree a defense against male hyperbole(defense of tribe).

    This is why it is so hard for males and females to communicate at any scale. This is why men and women cannot work in or debate politics together except under the most optimum of circumstances.

    Hyperbole (exaggeration) of offense, and NAXALT (exaggeration) of defense.

    Defending children vs Exciting men.

    These cognitive differences are real, universal, and inescapable.

    If men wanted to oppress women they would do so. They do not do so because those women are their wives, daughters, sisters and mothers.

    But if men agree to do something, there is nothing that can stop them. Because in the end, the use of violence determines all political conflict. And political competition is simply a means of circumventing political violence within the limits of provoking political violence.

    Western men treat their women better than all other people’s combined. And under majority democracy it has come at the cost of inequality of outcomes for those men. Hence why I recommend houses for the genders, if there is to be a democratic government of any kind: so that we limit each other.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 10:07:00 UTC

  • for me it’s to stop them as much as it is to help us. we don’t need much help ot

    for me it’s to stop them as much as it is to help us. we don’t need much help other than to stop the defecting of our women.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 11:46:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074269606750113792

    Reply addressees: @StirlingFinn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074259147648950273


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074259147648950273

  • ( Teaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all othe

    ( Teaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all other tactics combined. Why? Female/Beta Moral intuition cannot resist self defense. It’s so obvious that once you see it, you see it everywhere. It’s like NAXALT bait in a Pringles can. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 03:31:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074145024953208833

  • ( Teaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all othe

    ( Teaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all other tactics combined. Why? Female/Beta Moral intuition cannot resist self defense. It’s so obvious that once you see it, you see it everywhere. It’s like NAXALT bait in a Pringles can. )

    Ps: some females won’t fall for it – but few some betas won’t, but most will.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 22:31:00 UTC

  • King of The Hill Game Weeds out The Betas

    [T]eaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all other tactics combined.  Why? Female/Beta Moral intuition cannot resist self defense. It’s so obvious that once you see it, you see it everywhere. It’s like NAXALT bait in a Pringles can. Ps: some females won’t fall for it – but few some betas won’t, but most will.

  • King of The Hill Game Weeds out The Betas

    [T]eaching by the king of the hill game weeds out the betas faster than all other tactics combined.  Why? Female/Beta Moral intuition cannot resist self defense. It’s so obvious that once you see it, you see it everywhere. It’s like NAXALT bait in a Pringles can. Ps: some females won’t fall for it – but few some betas won’t, but most will.

  • JUST SHARED THIS WITH ME: (pls take credit whomever did so. i can’t find it) And

    https://thefederalist.com/2018/12/11/the-feminist-life-script-has-made-many-women-miserable-dont-let-it-sucker-you/SOMEONE JUST SHARED THIS WITH ME:

    (pls take credit whomever did so. i can’t find it)

    And it’s the net of it. But it’s not just that women are unhappy and live with it. it’s that white men are unhappy and committing suicide in droves because of it.

    So it’s not just women who suffer – as usual, its men who DIE.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 10:08:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617301757

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 04:19:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES —“Compared with Whites, Native Hawaiians had higher androstenedion

    DIFFERENCES

    —“Compared with Whites, Native Hawaiians had higher androstenedione (+22%, P = 0.017), total testosterone (+26%, P = 0.013), bioavailable testosterone (+33%, P = 0.002), E1 (≥21%; P = 0.009), total E2 (+26%, P = 0.001), bioavailable E2 (+31%, P < 0.001), and lower SHBG (−12% P = 0.07) levels. Compared with Whites, Japanese Americans had higher E2 (+15%, P = 0.036) and bioavailable E2 (+18%, P = 0.024) levels. African Americans also had higher E1 (+21%, P = 0.004), E2 (+20%, P = 0.007), and bioavailable E2 (+20%, P = 0.015) levels compared with Whites, whereas mean levels in Latinas were similar to those of Whites.”—-


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 16:07:00 UTC