I do not consider the female brain stupid whatsoever, but specialized for high risk temporal decision making in the preservation of environments in which young can survive.
Just as male brains are specialized for high risk intertemporal decision making in the preservation of environments in which their COLLECTIVE genes can survive, via that pack consisting of themselves and male relatives, and their herd of women, and those women’s herd of offspring.
WE WORK BY DIVIDING THE INTERTEMPORAL LABOR
Consistent, temporal, small, local, vs Variable, intertemporal, scale, and regional.
Seems to be a common observation that men informationally limited and insensitive and women are informationally oversaturated and hypersensitive, while we both have about the same limits on calculating decidability.
You hear this a lot:
–“Men are stupid and women are crazy”–
But honestly it’s just cognitive structure. The drawers of the male mind and relative insensitivity, and the nets of the female mind and relative hypersensitivity.
Evolution must have had a lot of fun rolling up those characters sheets….
Seriously. I wonder how many times Zeus rolled the dice before he said “Wow, do ya’ know how much fun we’re gonna have watching THIS pairing of the sexes? We are gonna be entertained for the next million years!!!”
(humans are endlessly interesting)Matt EvansAlways relevant: http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp202-us13/files/2012/05/Sauer-1992-Forensic-Anthropology-Race-Concept-1.pdfJan 4, 2019, 2:13 PMJanderson RexWhat an interesting paper. I wonder if the author actually believes race doesn’t exist or was merely being PC.
He doth protest a bit muchJan 4, 2019, 2:25 PMMatt EvansJanderson Rex the paper’s conclusion is hilariousJan 4, 2019, 2:32 PMSean Emm>there is no such thing as race
>who cares what skin color someone has
>there is only one race; the human race
you wouldn’t be able to tell race, gender, age, quality of life, brain size etc simply from a skull if it was a construct and only skin deepJan 4, 2019, 2:32 PMSteve PenderI made this graphic 14 years agoJan 4, 2019, 2:40 PMLiupold EngelwulfCurt I wonder if our skulls look the sameJan 4, 2019, 2:42 PMFreyr BjörnssonQuite amazing doublethink going on in this paperJan 4, 2019, 2:51 PMThomas Alt BeesleyThat caucasoid skull does seem to have an abnormal forehead from other examples I’ve seen.
*EDITTED for auto correct error*Jan 4, 2019, 2:51 PMCurt Doolittlei dunno but the only way we can tell is MRI, Xray or if our enemies decide they want to use us them for decoration.Jan 4, 2019, 2:51 PMCurt DoolittleProfiles are easier to compare.Jan 4, 2019, 2:52 PMThomas Alt BeesleyI just realized that my phone autocorrected “abnormal” to “a normal”
But yes, I agree with your statement regardless.Jan 4, 2019, 2:53 PMCurt Doolittleyes that caucasian skull has a larger lower jaw, and more overbite than usual.Jan 4, 2019, 2:54 PMCurt Doolittlejust covering his assJan 4, 2019, 2:55 PMRichard AllenJan 4, 2019, 3:14 PMRichard HallRichard Allen Race is only skin deep. 🤥Jan 4, 2019, 3:18 PMLisa OuthwaiteWhat are your thoughts on the elongated skulls found in South America and across Europe?Jan 4, 2019, 3:25 PMIan MalmströmAnd we see more similarities between asian and european skulls than between these and the african.
The denisovan/neanderthal link is prominent both when it comes to skulls and gwnetic markers (it’s no coincidence that asians and europeans have better analytic skills, and that neanderthals also have unique genes linked with analytic intelligence)Jan 4, 2019, 3:35 PMLiupold EngelwulfI’m a race realist but I’m wondering how much skulls vary among europeans. Using 1 skull from each race isn’t really doing it for me.Jan 4, 2019, 4:06 PMKari Anne DorstadI’m guess I’m a negroid ? Based on the size of head ?Jan 4, 2019, 4:11 PMCurt DoolittleNeoteny shortens the ‘snout’.Jan 4, 2019, 4:12 PMClaire Rae RandallYeah, but we’re ‘All One’, right?Jan 4, 2019, 4:13 PMKari Anne DorstadLisa Outhwaite good question!!Jan 4, 2019, 4:16 PMScott RhodesWhen I went to University, those were the only 3 acknowledged races, with the possible addition of Australian Aborigine.Jan 4, 2019, 4:30 PMSean Emmhow is this hard for race deniers to understand? you can see the human that would be skinned over these skulls quite easilyJan 4, 2019, 4:31 PMSean EmmJan 4, 2019, 4:33 PMGöran DahlTechnically, your university is right. When you look at a PCA-plot, you only see three large macroclusters, namely Sub-Saharan African, East Eurasian and West Eurasian; and then there are outliers and mixed ethnicities in-between them.Jan 4, 2019, 4:33 PMScott RhodesGöran Dahl I was satisfied with the nomenclature then and still am today, as you have underscored. Today, laypeople and even many who should know better, label religious groups and the like as “races”.Jan 4, 2019, 4:48 PMThomas Alt BeesleyWell, that and the forehead is malformed. It’s domed in the middle. Typically it’s flatter.Jan 4, 2019, 5:13 PMThomas Alt BeesleyLike this.Jan 4, 2019, 5:13 PMRichard HallMatt Evans Yea part of the abstract hints at race being a social construct:
“It is maintained in this paper that the successful
assignment of race to a skeletal specimen is not a vindication of the race concept, but rather a prediction
that an individual, while alive was assigned to a particular socially constructed ‘racial’ category. A
specimen may display features that point to African ancestry. In this country that person is likely to have
been labeled Black regardless of whether or not such a race actually exists in nature.”
An odd and needless knot to the himself in to.Jan 4, 2019, 6:20 PMRichard HallLiupold Engelwulf I’m sure this has been done with skulls that represent statistical averages.Jan 4, 2019, 6:22 PMChristian GrønningJan 4, 2019, 6:52 PMGreg Hamiltonthe fact that unless people are mixed they can be 100% sorted visually of course means nothing…
The fact they can be sorted visually just by bones. Means nothing…
The fact they can be DNA sorted means nothing…
Somehow race doesn’t exist ..Jan 4, 2019, 8:55 PMDustin HutchinsonLook at the highly developed prefrontal cortex on that beautiful caucasoid skull…
I wonder if that has any special significance?Jan 4, 2019, 8:59 PMThomas Alt Beesleyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqqdkKwbyG4Jan 4, 2019, 9:07 PMShawn David GevedonAccording J Phillip Rushton the White average brain size is about 1347cc’s and the Black average brain size is 1267cc’s. In contrast, the largest brain size recorded for an individual ape is 700cc’s. Scientists for a long, long time have known blacks have smaller brain size on average. If you can find a 1959 enclyclopedia Britannica the section on races will mention Whites have a larger brain size on average. The juice and liberals have had this racial information scrubbed from most books published after 1959. These are African Amercan stats the Sub Saharan black brain even smaller and IQ around 75. Dumb people will say blacks can be doctors, lawyers etc. that just repetition, practice anyone can do that but creativity is where smartness counts. The African hasn’t created nothing, couldn’t even grab concept of the wheel, domesticate animals, written language and so on. It’s sad that we cant discuss the truth that word racist is so important. I judge anyone by character I growed up in the hood, went to majority black schools.Jan 4, 2019, 9:07 PMThomas Alt BeesleyLooks like McNabb’s head tbh.Jan 4, 2019, 9:08 PMShawn David GevedonFront of brain is where the creativity lies.Jan 4, 2019, 9:27 PMAndrea RoyallThomas- I don’t know how old the skull is in the first profile.. but you can get “doming” with cranial malformation/ attempted correction during infancy.Jan 4, 2019, 11:44 PMThomas Alt BeesleyIt’s definitely interesting. I wonder what caused it.Jan 4, 2019, 11:47 PMAndrea RoyallWhat I see in modern infants is… they’re either premie, or sick and they’ve laid too long on one side and it’s created angles in the skull. These children go to a cranio-plastics physician and are measured and fitted for helmets that place pressure on certain points on the skull to decrease the angles. That can create a slight “dome” in the forehead. The helmets have a much higher efficiency if the Fontanelle hasn’t closed.Jan 4, 2019, 11:51 PMAndrea RoyallThat’s why I’d be interested to know how old that skull is…Jan 4, 2019, 11:51 PMCody McDonaldAsians and Caucasians are human the rest are notJan 5, 2019, 12:26 AMOdin WachtendorfTo be fair though, all hominids are a human.
One might be able to argue that Euro’s and Asians are if the same Sub-Species, where as Africans are not.Jan 5, 2019, 1:26 AMCody McDonaldAfricans are workers created by the space Jews (annunahki) to farm goldJan 5, 2019, 1:30 AMGöran DahlIt was a religious practice. The opposite was found in Proto-Indo-Europeans, more specifically Bell Beakers, who practiced intense board-swaddling on their babies to flatten their occipital bones, making them hyperbrachycephalic; a phenomenon still seen in East Asia and Southern Siberia, the latter being the place of origin for the paternal line of PIE people.Jan 5, 2019, 5:35 AMLisa OuthwaiteGöran Dahl Some of them fall into that category but head-boarding doesn’t increase the cranial volume. Some were legitimately elongated and larger. It explains why some societies practice such a bizarre custom – in order to mimic a previous elite class.Jan 5, 2019, 6:07 AMSimon StrömIan Malmström get varg out of your head. Modern Eurasians are closely related in a global context on account of having separated from Africans before splitting up while colonizing the world. Minuscule Neanderthal/Denisovan admixture are artifacts of having displaced other hominids during said colonization.Jan 5, 2019, 6:24 AMMartin ŠtěpánSimon Ström Didn’t Asians and Indo-Europeans leave it separately, making both of our closest relatives Africans and the similarities between us a case of convergent evolution?Jan 5, 2019, 6:59 AMMartin ŠtěpánAustralian is often unmentioned because they’re ultimately insignificant, as are dravidians. I also used to believe in Amerindian bring a separate race, altough I’m not sure where I got it from.Jan 5, 2019, 7:01 AMMartin ŠtěpánAgain, isn’t the divergence of Asians from Africans a seperate event to the seperating of Indo-Europeans from Africans?Jan 5, 2019, 7:03 AMCody McDonaldPeople may have went to Central Asia first and branched from there , also Asians have some other homonid mixed in with them like Europeans n whites have neanderthal mixed inJan 5, 2019, 7:26 AMAbhimanyu KarnawatRetards everywhere,do you understand the ecological fallacy?Jan 5, 2019, 8:13 AMAbhimanyu KarnawatDo you understand the bell curve?Jan 5, 2019, 10:13 AMSimon StrömNo. West (Caucasoid) and East (Mongoloid) Eurasians are more similar to each other than to Africans in terms of raw quantitative genetics, meaning shared drift and common descent, and not just by phys anthro metrics which may or may not be a result of convergent evolution.
Indo-European is an ethnolinguistic term which should not be used as a synonym for West Eurasians.
It should be stated however that all West Eurasians have varying degrees of ancestry from the “basal eurasians” who separated from the main Eurasian branch of anatomically modern humans, before the latter split into what would constitute the bulk of ancestries of West and East Eurasians, respectively.Jan 5, 2019, 5:54 PMAaron MilewskiOne more for the pile. 👌Jan 5, 2019, 7:21 PMLee TuckerGöran Dahl I thought Malay rated a separate categoryJan 6, 2019, 12:08 AMGöran DahlVery odd thing to say when they look like your average run-of-the-mill Southeast Asians, like Thais and Vietnamese. Perhaps you meant Papua New Guineans or something.Jan 6, 2019, 3:39 AMChris Bakerhttps://theracecardproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Skeleton-B05.jpg
But but but! The NPC’S say we’re all the same on the inside!!!! 👀👀😂Jan 7, 2019, 6:33 PMFASCINATING MORPHOLOGY: SKULL DIFFERENCES
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
There are always suckers for the shortcuts of sophism, pseudoscience, and the occult-supernatural. Most of them are women if it is submission (harmony). The rest are unsuccessful men if class-rotation(dominance). And alway pseudo-intellectuals leading with pretense of knowledge.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
It isn’t as easily because of greater variation and division of labor among the male population. But the most basic load to which males are predisposed to carry should be the dominance hierarchy and male peer group.
It probably goes a lot deeper and varies with class and IQ, and I bet there are actually evolved, discrete, ‘archetypical male clusters’ beyond the random, gaussian normal distribution of psychometric traits traits, (and the male-female division common to all of the animal kingdom.)
Whereas the female cognitive load varies in sophistication along the class or IQ axis, I think the lifecycle of the reproductive bottleneck-sex limits the evolutionary plasticity of its physiological cognitive load.
Men are not only biologically expendable but also evolutionarily plastic and differentiated along multiple axes of skills and ‘loads’.
—“Women turn more conservative when they have children.”—Martin
Or put another way, women evolved to carry a cognitive load, and will generate demand for that cognitive load, and the signals to reinforce it, in one way or another until they possess it.
It makes evolutionary sense that women who don’t have children would express ‘care’ to all, then express it more exclusively to their children when they have that “inventory” to worry about (expend their caretaking energies).
So women evolved to carry the cognitive load of caring about proportionality and caretaking almost exclusively (the young short term) while men tend to are about the full spectrum of moral intuitions equally (the tribe long term).
Men demand a cognitive load, but it seems less open to substitution than women. Men, we always have the tribe to defend.
(From Twitter: putting an end to Nassim Taleb’s insight, edited a bit for clarity)
WARNING: this is part of an ongoing debate on twitter between Molyneux and Taleb on intelligence and it is a controversial topic for Facebook. Unfortunately, this is a debate that must occur because is of profound importance for humanity – our values are not always survivable. Hence I’m sharing only with ‘Friends’.
Nassim (all), IQ describes a curve. East and west are superior for having culled underclass reproduction, while center have failed to cull underclass reproduction.
So, to reverse your statement: “I can understand loving one’s people, and apologizing for one’s people, but denying the science is quite sinister.”
Other ‘peoples’ are ‘inferior’ (meaning poorer) socially, economically, politically, and militarily because of Pareto problem created by the size of their lower classes in relation to their upper classes. Hence continuous middle eastern failure under underclass religion and rule. Despite the wealth of possessing the optimum trade routes, the middle east was unable to fix this problem.
Stephan is Correct. IQ (meaning, the relative size of genetic classes as measured by rate of learning), is the MOST important factor in group wealth. PERIOD. This is because trust and trustworthiness increase in concert with cognitive ability.
Nassim: Your ‘admiration’ for a certain class of individuals is unscientific as well: they and their behavior are why no large corporations, and only smaller (inefficient) organizations. Our ‘clerical’ education and society, is why we HAVE large (efficient) corporations. In other words YOU ARE DESPERATELY WRONG. Relative wealth = demographics.
Nassim, so if you hadn’t taken up this particular issue it wouldn’t have made me pay attention to, and understood, the catastrophic error in your conflation of individual speculators and the political orders in which wealth potential of such people is possible. YOU ARE WRONG.
Nassim: The west, despite beginning with Aryanism (sovereignty and tort law), and Aristotelianism (empiricism), SURVIVED the first wave of Semiticism (Abrahamism) because of genetic reserves. Every other civilization that has tolerated Semiticism has been destroyed by the continuous expansion of the underclasses.We are in the process of not-surviving the second wave of Semiticism.
Nassim: So I just unfortunately realized that your FatTony et all, sensibility is just Semitic hatred of high trust peoples who produce their extraordinary wealth by the production of COMMONS. And this insight, if widely understood will destroy your reputation even further.
You think that our high-trust people, are ‘suckers’ when it is precisely that social order and those values that allow us to produce the commons that make high returns possible, while those historical peoples you (out of racial bias) favor, were NEVER ABLE TO, because of ‘petty profiting’ that you favor.
It’s interesting that he often cites ancient genetic causes for hierarchy as a defence against SJW complaints regarding patriarchy and capitalism.
He correctly identifies the depth of hierarchy and inequality in ancient biological programming that goes right back to our most remote ancestors.
E.g. Dominance hierarchies in lobsters.
What’s frustrating is he doesn’t apply the same analogy to Western Dominance.
He attributes the Christian ethic as the source of the classical liberal / enlightenment values that birthed individualism as the source of Western Success (although he doesn’t say ‘Western success’ explicitly.
It seems apparent in my readings about indo-Europeans that the West developed sovereignty mostly as a bi-product of distributive power which was an accident of geography – sufficient rivers, fertile land, hills, crags and natural barriers to break up the European landscape into defensible City states which led cultural development away from centralised monopoly governments that formed in the Middle East, Egypt etc.
I think Peterson flaw is he gives to much credit to Christianity in his arguments for promoting the sovereign individual and fails to see the ancient source code for this cultural feature.
In a sense he feels the words of Abrahamism gifted us new programming for regarding the individual as sacred when it seems we had in us from our martial ethic and domestication allowed the extension of sovereignty down the classes as we had more people capable of the agency to hold the idea.
Which is why Christian Africa doesn’t have individualism and market success – software can’t take root in hardware that can’t process it.
——-
If I was to use a loose metaphor I feel like Western Sovereignty is like a European plant species that was kept tame my the conditions in which it rooted.
But once conditions changed and it had its shot it just spread across the earth and dominated – but first it had to be hardened by time and circumstance.
Eg The plant species Lantana species is a potted flower in the UK.
Once it was exported to Australia it thrived in the sunlight and grew rampant, choking out competitors.
I see Western Sovereignty the same.
Shaped my marital conflict over distributive geography and then once the conditions changes it became hyper-fertile and encompassed the world.
Small Sample but reflects everything else I see: AGENCY
—“The nature and extent of group differences in pain tolerance according to age, sex and race were examined. The method of pain tolerance determination was mechanical pressure on the Achilles tendon, performed on 41, 119 subjects as part of the Kaiser-Permanente Automated Multiphasic Screening examination. The results showed that, on the average, a) pain tolerance decreases with age; b) men tolerate more pain than women; and c) Whites tolerate more pain than Orientals, while Blacks occupy an intermediate position. When the results of this study are compared with earlier work, it appears that, with increasing age, tolerance to cutaneous pain increases and tolerance to deep pain decreases.”—
