(FB 1542980572 Timestamp) — “The primary tool of feminist communication: gossip, shaming, PC language, which has become the new religious orthodoxy and the new sins” — Dax Rayner (via Brandon Hayes)
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542928005 Timestamp) NAIL IN THE OBVIOUS COFFIN…. LATER MARRIAGE LEADING TO PAIRING OFF, AND INCREASING INCOME DIFFERENCES The best results on assortative mating and inequality I have seen by Tyler Cowen This paper studies the evolution of assortative mating in the permanent wage (the individual-specific component of wage) in the U.S., its role in the increase in family wage inequality, and the factors behind this evolution. I first document a substantial trend in assortative mating, as measured by the permanent wage correlation of couples, from 0.3 for families formed in the late 1960s to 0.52 for families formed in the late 1980s. I show that this trend accounts for more than one-third of the increase in family wage inequality across these cohorts of families. I then argue that the increase in marriage age across these cohorts contributed to the assortative mating and thus to the rising inequality. Individuals face a large degree of uncertainty about their permanent wages early in their careers. If they marry early, as most individuals in the late 1960s did, this uncertainty leads to weak marital sorting along permanent wage. But when marriage is delayed, as in the late 1980s, the sorting becomes stronger due to the quick resolution of this uncertainty with work experience. After providing reduced-form evidence on the impact of marriage age, I build and estimate a marriage model with wage uncertainty and show that the increase in marriage age can explain almost 80% of the increase in assortative mating. https://sites.google.com/site/alparslantuncay2018/research
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542993442 Timestamp) It is extremely clear that among the masculine and feminine biases – in particularly the need for community – favors the verbal, illusory, feminine, and conformist in some pools, and the actionable, existential masculine, and disruptive in others. Gender biases expressed at group levels at all scales. What is not clear is how absolutely rare the disruptive is – nor how – counter to intuitions – it’s the most important evolutionary trait for any civilization.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542980572 Timestamp) — “The primary tool of feminist communication: gossip, shaming, PC language, which has become the new religious orthodoxy and the new sins” — Dax Rayner (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542928005 Timestamp) NAIL IN THE OBVIOUS COFFIN…. LATER MARRIAGE LEADING TO PAIRING OFF, AND INCREASING INCOME DIFFERENCES The best results on assortative mating and inequality I have seen by Tyler Cowen This paper studies the evolution of assortative mating in the permanent wage (the individual-specific component of wage) in the U.S., its role in the increase in family wage inequality, and the factors behind this evolution. I first document a substantial trend in assortative mating, as measured by the permanent wage correlation of couples, from 0.3 for families formed in the late 1960s to 0.52 for families formed in the late 1980s. I show that this trend accounts for more than one-third of the increase in family wage inequality across these cohorts of families. I then argue that the increase in marriage age across these cohorts contributed to the assortative mating and thus to the rising inequality. Individuals face a large degree of uncertainty about their permanent wages early in their careers. If they marry early, as most individuals in the late 1960s did, this uncertainty leads to weak marital sorting along permanent wage. But when marriage is delayed, as in the late 1980s, the sorting becomes stronger due to the quick resolution of this uncertainty with work experience. After providing reduced-form evidence on the impact of marriage age, I build and estimate a marriage model with wage uncertainty and show that the increase in marriage age can explain almost 80% of the increase in assortative mating. https://sites.google.com/site/alparslantuncay2018/research
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542993442 Timestamp) It is extremely clear that among the masculine and feminine biases – in particularly the need for community – favors the verbal, illusory, feminine, and conformist in some pools, and the actionable, existential masculine, and disruptive in others. Gender biases expressed at group levels at all scales. What is not clear is how absolutely rare the disruptive is – nor how – counter to intuitions – it’s the most important evolutionary trait for any civilization.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543078130 Timestamp) The Church is Dying. It’s superstition promising life after death has been replaced by the promise of eliminating genetic differences in outcome under the pseudoscience marxism-postmodernism-feminism and a hatred of white man. What you don’t understand is that the religion was invented to conquer and defeat white man. It was imposed by violence just as was islam. With the same results. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were invented as hatreds of white man and his truth, reason, technology, markets, and aristocracy. They have always hated us. They have their reasons. We are evidence.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543078130 Timestamp) The Church is Dying. It’s superstition promising life after death has been replaced by the promise of eliminating genetic differences in outcome under the pseudoscience marxism-postmodernism-feminism and a hatred of white man. What you don’t understand is that the religion was invented to conquer and defeat white man. It was imposed by violence just as was islam. With the same results. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were invented as hatreds of white man and his truth, reason, technology, markets, and aristocracy. They have always hated us. They have their reasons. We are evidence.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
(FB 1543761156 Timestamp) THESE STRATEGIES MAP TO THE THREE ROLES 1 – Ascendant-Male (Libertarian Productive), 2 – In-Demand-Male (Conservative), and; 3 – Female-and-Female-Allied-Male (Consumptive). Physics and Economics in Everything.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543674852 Timestamp) WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES? (important explanations) —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Å tÄpán Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness. So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction. And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens. Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex. The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity. Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.) Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency). I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.